Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EQX vs LIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
EQX vs LIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $11.33B | $232.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.85B | $34.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $225M | $7.13B |
| Gross Margin | 25.0% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.8% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 28.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.55B | $26.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $407M | $5.06B |
EQX vs LIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX) | 100 | 155.9 | +55.9% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 248.0 | +148.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EQX vs LIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EQX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -47.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 26.8%, current ratio 1.56x
- 22.1% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
- 376.9% 10Y total return vs EQX's 236.5%
- PEG 1.11 vs EQX's 1.37
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 28.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs EQX's 12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs EQX's 0.72 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +108.5% vs LIN's +13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs EQX's 2.4%, ROIC 11.3% vs 5.7% |
EQX vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EQX vs LIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 18.7x EQX's $1.8B. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EQX's 12.2%. On growth, LIN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $34.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $966M | $12.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $225M | $7.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $5.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -76.2% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
EQX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.4x trailing earnings, LIN trades at a 14% valuation discount to EQX's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LIN offers better value at 1.36x vs EQX's 1.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.3B | $232.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.5B | $254.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.92x | 34.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.39x | 28.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.37x | 1.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.91x | 20.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.13x | 6.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.57x | 5.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 45.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $5 for EQX. EQX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIN's 0.68x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.5% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $21.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $407M | $5.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.73x | 34.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — EQX and LIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,813 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,983 for EQX. Over the past 12 months, EQX leads with a +108.5% total return vs LIN's +13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQX at 36.0% vs LIN's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.0% | +17.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +108.5% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.5% | +41.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.8% | +78.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +236.5% | +376.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.0% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EQX's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIN currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs EQX's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.96 | $521.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.61 | $387.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.8% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.8M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EQX as "Buy" and LIN as "Buy". LIN is the only dividend payer here at 1.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $539.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% |
LIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EQX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
EQX vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EQX or LIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Equinox Gold Corp.
(EQX) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 34. 4x trailing P/E (28. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EQX or LIN?
On trailing P/E, Linde plc (LIN) is the cheapest at 34.
4x versus Equinox Gold Corp. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Equinox Gold Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EQX or LIN?
Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +78.
1%, compared to +69. 8% for Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +376. 9% versus EQX's +236. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EQX or LIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus Equinox Gold Corp. 's 0. 72β — meaning EQX is approximately 199% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 68% for Linde plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EQX or LIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Equinox Gold Corp.
(EQX) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Linde plc grew EPS 7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 1% for Equinox Gold Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EQX leads at 24. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EQX or LIN?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus 12. 2% for Equinox Gold Corp. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus 23. 8% for EQX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EQX or LIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Equinox Gold Corp.
(EQX) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 28. 1x for Linde plc — 17. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — EQX or LIN?
In this comparison, LIN (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. EQX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EQX or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +376. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +376. 9%, EQX: +236. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EQX and LIN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EQX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. LIN pays a dividend while EQX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.