Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ERIC vs HPE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ERIC
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • SE
Market Cap$36.64B
5Y Perf.+30.5%
HPE
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$39.92B
5Y Perf.+209.4%

ERIC vs HPE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ERIC logoERIC
HPE logoHPE
IndustryCommunication EquipmentCommunication Equipment
Market Cap$36.64B$39.92B
Revenue (TTM)$229.96B$35.79B
Net Income (TTM)$27.75B$-156M
Gross Margin48.1%30.7%
Operating Margin13.8%5.8%
Forward P/E2.0x12.5x
Total Debt$46.04B$22.36B
Cash & Equiv.$43.93B$5.77B

ERIC vs HPELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ERIC
HPE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Telefonaktiebolaget… (ERIC)100130.5+30.5%
Hewlett Packard Ent… (HPE)100309.4+209.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ERIC vs HPE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ERIC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ERIC
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
The Income Pick

ERIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 2.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 41.8%, current ratio 1.29x
  • Beta 0.61, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.29x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
HPE
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
The Growth Play

HPE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth -102.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
  • 276.0% 10Y total return vs ERIC's 78.8%
  • 14.1% revenue growth vs ERIC's -14.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHPE logoHPE14.1% revenue growth vs ERIC's -14.2%
ValueERIC logoERICLower P/E (2.0x vs 12.5x)
Quality / MarginsERIC logoERIC12.1% margin vs HPE's -0.4%
Stability / SafetyERIC logoERICBeta 0.61 vs HPE's 1.62, lower leverage
DividendsERIC logoERIC2.4% yield, vs HPE's 2.0%
Momentum (1Y)HPE logoHPE+83.5% vs ERIC's +48.5%
Efficiency (ROA)ERIC logoERIC10.0% ROA vs HPE's -0.2%, ROIC 22.3% vs 3.5%

ERIC vs HPE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ERICTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
FY 2025
Services
39.3%$92.9B
Hardware
37.4%$88.6B
Software
23.3%$55.1B
HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Company
FY 2025
Server Segment
51.4%$17.6B
Networking
19.9%$6.8B
Hybrid Cloud
16.2%$5.5B
Financial Services
10.2%$3.5B
Corporate Investments
2.2%$769M

ERIC vs HPE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLERICLAGGINGHPE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ERIC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

ERIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $230.0B annually — 6.4x HPE's $35.8B. ERIC is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HPE's -0.4%. On growth, HPE holds the edge at +19.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricERIC logoERICTelefonaktiebolag…HPE logoHPEHewlett Packard E…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$230.0B$35.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$39.1B$4.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$27.7B-$156M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$29.1B$4.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.1%+30.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.8%+5.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.1%-0.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.6%+12.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-9.2%+19.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+70.7%-26.2%
ERIC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ERIC and HPE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ERIC's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HPE's 12.9x.

MetricERIC logoERICTelefonaktiebolag…HPE logoHPEHewlett Packard E…
Market CapShares × price$36.6B$39.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$36.9B$56.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.87x-673.54x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.03x12.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.09x12.90x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.53x1.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.36x1.61x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.96x63.67x
Evenly matched — ERIC and HPE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ERIC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

ERIC delivers a 29.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-1 for HPE. ERIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HPE's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ERIC scores 6/9 vs HPE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricERIC logoERICTelefonaktiebolag…HPE logoHPEHewlett Packard E…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+29.0%-0.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+10.0%-0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+22.3%+3.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+18.4%+3.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.42x0.90x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.1B$16.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$43.9B$5.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$46.0B$22.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense13.62x-11.81x
ERIC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — ERIC and HPE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HPE five years ago would be worth $20,404 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,686 for ERIC. Over the past 12 months, HPE leads with a +83.5% total return vs ERIC's +48.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ERIC at 33.1% vs HPE's 30.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricERIC logoERICTelefonaktiebolag…HPE logoHPEHewlett Packard E…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+27.3%+24.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+48.5%+83.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+135.6%+124.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.1%+104.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+78.8%+276.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+33.1%+30.8%
Evenly matched — ERIC and HPE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ERIC and HPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ERIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HPE's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricERIC logoERICTelefonaktiebolag…HPE logoHPEHewlett Packard E…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.61x1.62x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.19$30.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.16$16.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.9%+99.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.867.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9.9M15.1M
Evenly matched — ERIC and HPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ERIC and HPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates ERIC as "Hold" and HPE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -4.4% upside for HPE (target: $29) vs -41.8% for ERIC (target: $7). For income investors, ERIC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.42% vs HPE's 2.00%.

MetricERIC logoERICTelefonaktiebolag…HPE logoHPEHewlett Packard E…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.94$28.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts4037
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.4%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.68$0.60
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.5%
Evenly matched — ERIC and HPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ERIC leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.

Best OverallTelefonaktiebolaget LM Eric… (ERIC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ERIC vs HPE: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ERIC or HPE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) is the stronger pick with 14.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 2% for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC). Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (2. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) a "Hold" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ERIC or HPE?

On forward P/E, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) is actually cheaper at 2.

0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ERIC or HPE?

Over the past 5 years, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) delivered a total return of +104.

0%, compared to -3. 1% for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HPE returned +276. 0% versus ERIC's +78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ERIC or HPE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

61β versus Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's 1. 62β — meaning HPE is approximately 163% more volatile than ERIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 90% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ERIC or HPE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) is pulling ahead at 14.

1% versus -14. 2% for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC). Over a 3-year CAGR, HPE leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ERIC or HPE?

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) is the more profitable company, earning 12.

0% net margin versus 0. 2% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ERIC leads at 13. 8% versus 4. 8% for HPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ERIC leads at 48. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ERIC or HPE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) trades at 2.

0x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HPE: -4. 4% to $28. 71.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ERIC or HPE?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 2. 0% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE).

09

Is ERIC or HPE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

61), 2. 4% yield). Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ERIC: +78. 8%, HPE: +276. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ERIC and HPE?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ERIC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ERIC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HPE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ERIC and HPE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ERIC: -9.2% · HPE: 19.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.