ES
Eversource Energy
Regulated Electric
Market Cap$25.75B
5Y Perf.-18.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ES vs ED
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
Regulated Electric
Market Cap$25.17B
5Y Perf.+42.4%
ES vs ED — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ES | ED |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $25.75B | $25.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.55B | $16.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.69B | $2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 47.8% | 64.4% |
| Operating Margin | 22.1% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.5x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $30.28B | $315M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $135M | $1M |
ES vs ED — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ES
ED
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eversource Energy (ES) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
| Consolidated Edison… (ED) | 100 | 142.4 | +42.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ES vs ED
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ES leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Consolidated Edison, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ES
Eversource Energy
The Income Pick
ES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 4.3%
- Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth 100.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, current ratio 0.65x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
ED is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 85.6% 10Y total return vs ES's 61.8%
- PEG 1.53 vs ES's 2.93
- Lower D/E ratio (1.3% vs 185.2%)
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ES | 13.8% revenue growth vs ED's 10.9% |
| Value | ES | Lower P/E (14.5x vs 17.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | ES | 12.5% margin vs ED's 12.3% |
| Stability / Safety | ED | Lower D/E ratio (1.3% vs 185.2%) |
| Dividends | ES | 4.3% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs ED's 3.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ES | +20.9% vs ED's -0.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ED | 2.8% ROA vs ES's 2.7%, ROIC 6.0% vs 4.9% |
ES vs ED — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
ES vs ED — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEDLAGGINGES
ESEversource Energy
2leads
EDConsolidated Edison, …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ESMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ES4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ED7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ED5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ED2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
ES2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ED and ES operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $13.5B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.5% (ES) to 12.3% (ED).
| Metric | ESEversource Energy | EDConsolidated Edis… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.5B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.4B | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$45M | $3.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.8% | +64.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +20.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.4% | +10.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | +12.4% |
ES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ES and ED each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, ES trades at a 21% valuation discount to ED's 18.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ED offers better value at 1.65x vs ES's 2.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ESEversource Energy | EDConsolidated Edis… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25.8B | $25.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $55.9B | $25.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.03x | 18.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.54x | 17.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.93x | 1.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.36x | 4.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.90x | 1.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.56x | 1.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.56x |
Evenly matched — ES and ED each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ED leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ES delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $8 for ED. ED carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ES's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ED scores 7/9 vs ES's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ESEversource Energy | EDConsolidated Edis… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.6% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.85x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30.1B | $314M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $135M | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30.3B | $315M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.40x | 0.77x |
ED leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ED leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ED five years ago would be worth $15,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,752 for ES. Over the past 12 months, ES leads with a +20.9% total return vs ED's -0.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ED at 5.7% vs ES's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ESEversource Energy | EDConsolidated Edis… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.8% | +7.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.9% | -0.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.6% | +18.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.5% | +58.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.8% | +85.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.2% | +5.7% |
ED leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ED leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ED is the less volatile stock with a -0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ES's 0.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ESEversource Energy | EDConsolidated Edis… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | -0.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.41 | $116.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.92 | $94.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.7% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 44.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 1.8M |
ED leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
ES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ES as "Hold" and ED as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for ES (target: $74) vs 1.8% for ED (target: $109). For income investors, ES offers the higher dividend yield at 4.30% vs ED's 2.96%.
| Metric | ESEversource Energy | EDConsolidated Edis… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $74.00 | $108.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 24 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.94 | $3.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ED leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ES leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallConsolidated Edison, Inc. (ED)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ES vs ED: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ES or ED a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eversource Energy (ES) is the stronger pick with 13.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 9% for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED). Eversource Energy (ES) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (14. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eversource Energy (ES) a "Hold" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ES or ED?
On trailing P/E, Eversource Energy (ES) is the cheapest at 15.
0x versus Consolidated Edison, Inc. at 18. 9x. On forward P/E, Eversource Energy is actually cheaper at 14. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ES or ED?
Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Edison, Inc.
(ED) delivered a total return of +58. 2%, compared to -2. 5% for Eversource Energy (ES). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ED returned +85. 6% versus ES's +61. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ES or ED?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Consolidated Edison, Inc.
(ED) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 41β versus Eversource Energy's 0. 27β — meaning ES is approximately -164% more volatile than ED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 185% for Eversource Energy — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ES or ED?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eversource Energy (ES) is pulling ahead at 13.
8% versus 10. 9% for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eversource Energy grew EPS 100. 9% year-over-year, compared to 7. 6% for Consolidated Edison, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ES leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ES or ED?
Eversource Energy (ES) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
5% net margin versus 12. 0% for Consolidated Edison, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ES leads at 22. 1% versus 17. 3% for ED. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ED leads at 81. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ES or ED more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Eversource Energy (ES) trades at 14.
5x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Consolidated Edison, Inc. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ES: 8. 0% to $74. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ES or ED?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Eversource Energy (ES) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 3. 0% for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED).
09Is ES or ED better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Consolidated Edison, Inc.
(ED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 41), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ED: +85. 6%, ES: +61. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ES and ED?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ES is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ED is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ES: 13.4% · ED: 10.7%)Net Margin>
%
(ES: 12.5% · ED: 12.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ES: 15.0x · ED: 18.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.