Leisure
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ESCA vs MCRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
ESCA vs MCRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $256M | $2.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $240M | $545M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $101M |
| Gross Margin | 27.1% | 53.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $20M | $26M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $96M |
ESCA vs MCRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Escalade, Incorpora… (ESCA) | 100 | 133.5 | +33.5% |
| Monarch Casino & Re… (MCRI) | 100 | 378.6 | +278.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESCA vs MCRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ESCA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 3.2%
- Beta 0.87, yield 3.2%, current ratio 4.28x
- Lower P/E (17.3x vs 19.5x)
MCRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth 41.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs ESCA's 136.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 4.8%, current ratio 0.86x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.4% revenue growth vs ESCA's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.3x vs 19.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs ESCA's 6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs ESCA's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs MCRI's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.9% vs ESCA's +33.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.2% ROA vs ESCA's 6.9%, ROIC 21.8% vs 7.5% |
ESCA vs MCRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ESCA vs MCRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCRI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $545M annually — 2.3x ESCA's $240M. MCRI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ESCA's 6.4%. On growth, MCRI holds the edge at +4.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $240M | $545M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $182M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $101M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $31M | $128M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | +53.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +23.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.6% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.2% | -8.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ESCA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.8x trailing earnings, ESCA trades at a 21% valuation discount to MCRI's 23.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ESCA's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MCRI's 11.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $256M | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $264M | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.82x | 23.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.25x | 19.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.11x | 11.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.07x | 4.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 4.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.00x | 17.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCRI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCRI delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $9 for ESCA. MCRI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ESCA's 0.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESCA scores 8/9 vs MCRI's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.0% | +18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | +14.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +21.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +24.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | -$71M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $96M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $26M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 37.31x | 225.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCRI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCRI five years ago would be worth $19,808 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,137 for ESCA. Over the past 12 months, MCRI leads with a +53.9% total return vs ESCA's +33.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCRI at 24.2% vs ESCA's 14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.3% | +35.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.2% | +53.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.9% | +91.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.6% | +98.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.9% | +515.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.4% | +24.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MCRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ESCA's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCRI currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs ESCA's 87.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.32 | $130.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.41 | $82.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.4% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 74.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35K | 136K |
Analyst Outlook
ESCA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ESCA as "Buy" and MCRI as "Hold". For income investors, ESCA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs MCRI's 0.91%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $104.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $1.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +3.2% |
MCRI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ESCA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
ESCA vs MCRI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESCA or MCRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA). Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (17. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ESCA or MCRI?
On trailing P/E, Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) is the cheapest at 18.
8x versus Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. at 23. 8x. On forward P/E, Escalade, Incorporated is actually cheaper at 17. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ESCA or MCRI?
Over the past 5 years, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) delivered a total return of +98. 1%, compared to -8. 6% for Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCRI returned +515. 7% versus ESCA's +136. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ESCA or MCRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Escalade, Incorporated's 0. 87β — meaning ESCA is approximately 59% more volatile than MCRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (MCRI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 11% for Escalade, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ESCA or MCRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus -4. 5% for Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. grew EPS 41. 4% year-over-year, compared to 7. 6% for Escalade, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, MCRI leads at 4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ESCA or MCRI?
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus 5. 7% for Escalade, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCRI leads at 25. 1% versus 7. 8% for ESCA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCRI leads at 45. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ESCA or MCRI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) trades at 17.
3x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ESCA or MCRI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 0. 9% for Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (MCRI).
09Is ESCA or MCRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 0. 9% yield, +515. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCRI: +515. 7%, ESCA: +136. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ESCA and MCRI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ESCA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MCRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.