Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ESCA logo
ESCA
MCRI logo
MCRI
DKNG logo
DKNG
SPWH logo
SPWH
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ESCA
Escalade, Incorporated

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$256M
5Y Perf.+33.5%
MCRI
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.31B
5Y Perf.+278.6%
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14.38B
5Y Perf.-12.8%
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$48M
5Y Perf.-91.4%

ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ESCA logoESCA
MCRI logoMCRI
DKNG logoDKNG
SPWH logoSPWH
IndustryLeisureGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & CasinosSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$256M$2.31B$14.38B$48M
Revenue (TTM)$240M$545M$6.29B$1.22B
Net Income (TTM)$15M$101M$59M$-51M
Gross Margin27.1%53.0%41.8%30.0%
Operating Margin8.7%23.4%0.6%-1.1%
Forward P/E17.3x19.5x122.9x
Total Debt$20M$26M$1.93B$427M
Cash & Equiv.$12M$96M$1.60B$2M

ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ESCA
MCRI
DKNG
SPWH
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Escalade, Incorpora… (ESCA)100133.5+33.5%
Monarch Casino & Re… (MCRI)100378.6+278.6%
DraftKings Inc. (DKNG)10087.2-12.8%
Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH)1008.6-91.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MCRI leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Escalade, Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. DKNG also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇MCRI emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ESCA
Escalade, Incorporated
The Income Pick

ESCA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 3.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 11.4%, current ratio 4.28x
  • Beta 0.87, yield 3.2%, current ratio 4.28x
  • Lower P/E (17.3x vs 122.9x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MCRI
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MCRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 5.2% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 195.9%
  • 18.6% margin vs SPWH's -4.2%
  • Beta 0.55 vs SPWH's 1.62, lower leverage
  • +53.9% vs SPWH's -70.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.
The Growth Play

DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
  • 27.0% revenue growth vs ESCA's -4.5%
Best for: growth exposure
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
The Secondary Option

SPWH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthDKNG logoDKNG27.0% revenue growth vs ESCA's -4.5%
ValueESCA logoESCALower P/E (17.3x vs 122.9x)
Quality / MarginsMCRI logoMCRI18.6% margin vs SPWH's -4.2%
Stability / SafetyMCRI logoMCRIBeta 0.55 vs SPWH's 1.62, lower leverage
DividendsESCA logoESCA3.2% yield, vs MCRI's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MCRI logoMCRI+53.9% vs SPWH's -70.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MCRI logoMCRI14.2% ROA vs SPWH's -5.9%, ROIC 21.8% vs -1.6%

ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ESCAEscalade, Incorporated
FY 2025
Sporting Goods
100.0%$240M
MCRIMonarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
FY 2025
Casino
57.6%$314M
Food and beverage
23.9%$130M
Hotel
14.0%$76M
Other
4.6%$25M
DKNGDraftKings Inc.
FY 2025
Product and Service, Other
100.0%$423M
SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMCRILAGGINGDKNG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MCRI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

DKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.3B annually — 26.2x ESCA's $240M. MCRI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPWH's -4.2%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +16.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricESCA logoESCAEscalade, Incorpo…MCRI logoMCRIMonarch Casino & …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.SPWH logoSPWHSportsman's Wareh…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$240M$545M$6.3B$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$25M$182M$313M$25M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$15M$101M$59M-$51M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$31M$128M$679M$13M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.1%+53.0%+41.8%+30.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.7%+23.4%+0.6%-1.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.4%+18.6%+0.9%-4.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.7%+23.6%+10.8%+1.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.6%+4.1%+16.8%+2.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+63.2%-8.1%+157.7%0.0%
MCRI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SPWH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.8x trailing earnings, ESCA trades at a 21% valuation discount to MCRI's 23.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ESCA's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 56.6x.

MetricESCA logoESCAEscalade, Incorpo…MCRI logoMCRIMonarch Casino & …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.SPWH logoSPWHSportsman's Wareh…
Market CapShares × price$256M$2.3B$14.4B$48M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$264M$2.2B$14.7B$473M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.82x23.76x-3580.25x-0.95x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.25x19.52x122.88x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.70x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.11x11.70x56.63x18.80x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.07x4.23x2.37x0.04x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.49x4.50x22.77x0.25x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.00x17.97x22.20x5.40x
SPWH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MCRI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

MCRI delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-26 for SPWH. MCRI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESCA scores 8/9 vs SPWH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricESCA logoESCAEscalade, Incorpo…MCRI logoMCRIMonarch Casino & …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.SPWH logoSPWHSportsman's Wareh…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.0%+18.7%+7.9%-26.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.9%+14.2%+1.3%-5.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.5%+21.8%-0.9%-1.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.8%+24.7%-0.6%-2.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98774
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.05x3.06x2.26x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8M-$71M$330M$425M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$12M$96M$1.6B$2M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$20M$26M$1.9B$427M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense37.31x225.55x4.48x-2.69x
MCRI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MCRI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MCRI five years ago would be worth $19,808 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $688 for SPWH. Over the past 12 months, MCRI leads with a +53.9% total return vs SPWH's -70.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCRI at 24.2% vs SPWH's -37.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricESCA logoESCAEscalade, Incorpo…MCRI logoMCRIMonarch Casino & …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.SPWH logoSPWHSportsman's Wareh…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+38.3%+35.0%-18.7%-15.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+33.2%+53.9%-23.6%-70.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.9%+91.6%+13.9%-74.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-8.6%+98.1%-42.7%-93.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+136.9%+515.7%+195.9%-84.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.4%+24.2%+4.4%-37.0%
MCRI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MCRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MCRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWH's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCRI currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs SPWH's 28.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricESCA logoESCAEscalade, Incorpo…MCRI logoMCRIMonarch Casino & …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.SPWH logoSPWHSportsman's Wareh…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x0.55x0.87x1.62x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.32$130.85$48.78$4.33
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.41$82.18$20.46$1.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.4%+98.6%+59.5%+28.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.574.572.143.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded35K136K12.1M796K
MCRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ESCA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ESCA as "Buy", MCRI as "Hold", DKNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.3% upside for DKNG (target: $36) vs -19.0% for MCRI (target: $105). For income investors, ESCA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs MCRI's 0.91%.

MetricESCA logoESCAEscalade, Incorpo…MCRI logoMCRIMonarch Casino & …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.SPWH logoSPWHSportsman's Wareh…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$104.50$35.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts5948
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60$1.17
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.2%+3.2%+5.8%+0.4%
ESCA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MCRI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPWH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallMonarch Casino & Resort, In… (MCRI)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.

(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA). Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (17. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH?

On trailing P/E, Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) is the cheapest at 18.

8x versus Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. at 23. 8x. On forward P/E, Escalade, Incorporated is actually cheaper at 17. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH?

Over the past 5 years, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.

(MCRI) delivered a total return of +98. 1%, compared to -93. 1% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCRI returned +515. 7% versus SPWH's -84. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.

(MCRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 62β — meaning SPWH is approximately 197% more volatile than MCRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (MCRI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.

(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus -4. 5% for Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH?

Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.

(MCRI) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus -4. 1% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCRI leads at 25. 1% versus -1. 2% for SPWH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCRI leads at 45. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) trades at 17.

3x forward P/E versus 122. 9x for DraftKings Inc. — 105. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKNG: 23. 3% to $35. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH?

In this comparison, ESCA (3.

2% yield), MCRI (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DKNG, SPWH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.

(MCRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 0. 9% yield, +515. 7% 10Y return). Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCRI: +515. 7%, SPWH: -84. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ESCA and MCRI and DKNG and SPWH?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ESCA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MCRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ESCA, MCRI pay a dividend while DKNG, SPWH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.