Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ESCA logo
ESCA
MCRI logo
MCRI
JPM logo
JPM
DKNG logo
DKNG
BAC logo
BAC
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ESCA vs MCRI vs JPM vs DKNG vs BAC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ESCA
Escalade, Incorporated

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$256M
5Y Perf.+33.5%
MCRI
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.31B
5Y Perf.+278.6%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14.38B
5Y Perf.-12.8%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$422.78B
5Y Perf.+135.9%

ESCA vs MCRI vs JPM vs DKNG vs BAC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ESCA logoESCA
MCRI logoMCRI
JPM logoJPM
DKNG logoDKNG
BAC logoBAC
IndustryLeisureGambling, Resorts & CasinosBanks - DiversifiedGambling, Resorts & CasinosBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$256M$2.31B$896.00B$14.38B$422.78B
Revenue (TTM)$240M$545M$280.33B$6.29B$191.57B
Net Income (TTM)$15M$101M$57.05B$59M$30.51B
Gross Margin27.1%53.0%60.0%41.8%56.1%
Operating Margin8.7%23.4%25.9%0.6%19.7%
Forward P/E17.3x19.5x14.4x122.9x12.6x
Total Debt$20M$26M$942.38B$1.93B$365.90B
Cash & Equiv.$12M$96M$343.34B$1.60B$231.84B

ESCA vs MCRI vs JPM vs DKNG vs BACLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ESCA
MCRI
JPM
DKNG
BAC
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Escalade, Incorpora… (ESCA)100133.5+33.5%
Monarch Casino & Re… (MCRI)100378.6+278.6%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
DraftKings Inc. (DKNG)10087.2-12.8%
Bank of America Cor… (BAC)100235.9+135.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ESCA vs MCRI vs JPM vs DKNG vs BAC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MCRI leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. Escalade, Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. JPM, DKNG, and BAC also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇MCRI emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ESCA
Escalade, Incorporated
The Defensive Pick

ESCA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 0.87, yield 3.2%, current ratio 4.28x
  • 3.2% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: defensive
MCRI
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MCRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 5.2% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 4.8%, current ratio 0.86x
  • PEG 0.57 vs BAC's 0.82
  • Beta 0.55 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.

  • NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
  • 20.4% margin vs DKNG's 0.9%
Best for: bank quality
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.
The Growth Play

DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
  • 27.0% revenue growth vs ESCA's -4.5%
Best for: growth exposure
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
The Banking Pick

BAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 2.3%
  • Lower P/E (12.6x vs 122.9x)
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthDKNG logoDKNG27.0% revenue growth vs ESCA's -4.5%
ValueBAC logoBACLower P/E (12.6x vs 122.9x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs DKNG's 0.9%
Stability / SafetyMCRI logoMCRIBeta 0.55 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsESCA logoESCA3.2% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MCRI logoMCRI+53.9% vs DKNG's -23.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MCRI logoMCRI14.2% ROA vs BAC's 0.9%, ROIC 21.8% vs 3.5%

ESCA vs MCRI vs JPM vs DKNG vs BAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ESCAEscalade, Incorporated
FY 2025
Sporting Goods
100.0%$240M
MCRIMonarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
FY 2025
Casino
57.6%$314M
Food and beverage
23.9%$130M
Hotel
14.0%$76M
Other
4.6%$25M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
DKNGDraftKings Inc.
FY 2025
Product and Service, Other
100.0%$423M
BACBank of America Corporation
FY 2024
Loans and Leases
32.2%$62.0B
other interest income
14.7%$28.3B
Debt securities
13.5%$26.0B
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
10.3%$19.9B
Investment And Brokerage Services
9.2%$17.8B
Market making and similar activities
6.7%$13.0B
Trading account assets
5.4%$10.4B
Other (4)
7.8%$15.1B

ESCA vs MCRI vs JPM vs DKNG vs BAC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMCRILAGGINGBAC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1165.8x ESCA's $240M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DKNG's 0.9%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +16.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricESCA logoESCAEscalade, Incorpo…MCRI logoMCRIMonarch Casino & …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.BAC logoBACBank of America C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$240M$545M$280.3B$6.3B$191.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$25M$182M$81.4B$313M$40.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$15M$101M$57.0B$59M$30.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$31M$128M$100.9B$679M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.1%+53.0%+60.0%+41.8%+56.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.7%+23.4%+25.9%+0.6%+19.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.4%+18.6%+20.4%+0.9%+15.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.7%+23.6%+36.0%+10.8%+6.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.6%+4.1%+16.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+63.2%-8.1%+16.0%+157.7%+18.3%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ESCA and BAC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 38% valuation discount to MCRI's 23.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MCRI offers better value at 0.70x vs BAC's 0.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricESCA logoESCAEscalade, Incorpo…MCRI logoMCRIMonarch Casino & …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.BAC logoBACBank of America C…
Market CapShares × price$256M$2.3B$896.0B$14.4B$422.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$264M$2.2B$1.50T$14.7B$556.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.82x23.76x16.00x-3580.25x14.66x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.25x19.52x14.40x122.88x12.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.70x0.90x0.95x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.11x11.70x18.36x56.63x13.92x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.07x4.23x3.20x2.37x2.21x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.49x4.50x2.47x22.77x1.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.00x17.97x8.88x22.20x33.52x
Evenly matched — ESCA and BAC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MCRI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

MCRI delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $8 for DKNG. MCRI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESCA scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricESCA logoESCAEscalade, Incorpo…MCRI logoMCRIMonarch Casino & …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.BAC logoBACBank of America C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.0%+18.7%+15.9%+7.9%+10.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.9%+14.2%+1.3%+1.3%+0.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.5%+21.8%+4.5%-0.9%+3.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.8%+24.7%+8.9%-0.6%+4.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987577
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.05x2.60x3.06x1.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8M-$71M$599.0B$330M$134.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$12M$96M$343.3B$1.6B$231.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$20M$26M$942.4B$1.9B$365.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense37.31x225.55x0.74x4.48x0.48x
MCRI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,729 for DKNG. Over the past 12 months, MCRI leads with a +53.9% total return vs DKNG's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs DKNG's 4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricESCA logoESCAEscalade, Incorpo…MCRI logoMCRIMonarch Casino & …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.BAC logoBACBank of America C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+38.3%+35.0%-0.5%-18.7%+1.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+33.2%+53.9%+21.8%-23.6%+28.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.9%+91.6%+138.2%+13.9%+103.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-8.6%+98.1%+118.2%-42.7%+47.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+136.9%+515.7%+465.8%+195.9%+368.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.4%+24.2%+33.6%+4.4%+26.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MCRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MCRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCRI currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs DKNG's 59.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricESCA logoESCAEscalade, Incorpo…MCRI logoMCRIMonarch Casino & …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.BAC logoBACBank of America C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x0.55x0.94x0.87x0.86x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.32$130.85$337.25$48.78$57.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.41$82.18$262.71$20.46$43.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.4%+98.6%+95.1%+59.5%+97.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.574.559.172.168.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded35K136K7.0M12.1M31.7M
MCRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ESCA and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ESCA as "Buy", MCRI as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", BAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.3% upside for DKNG (target: $36) vs -19.0% for MCRI (target: $105). For income investors, ESCA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs MCRI's 0.91%.

MetricESCA logoESCAEscalade, Incorpo…MCRI logoMCRIMonarch Casino & …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.BAC logoBACBank of America C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$104.50$339.75$35.75$61.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts59614854
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%+0.9%+1.9%+2.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises001512
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60$1.17$5.95$1.27
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.2%+3.2%+3.9%+5.8%+5.1%
Evenly matched — ESCA and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MCRI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallMonarch Casino & Resort, In… (MCRI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ESCA vs MCRI vs JPM vs DKNG vs BAC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ESCA or MCRI or JPM or DKNG or BAC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.

(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ESCA or MCRI or JPM or DKNG or BAC?

On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.

7x versus Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. at 23. 8x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. wins at 0. 57x versus Bank of America Corporation's 0. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ESCA or MCRI or JPM or DKNG or BAC?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -42. 7% for DraftKings Inc. (DKNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCRI returned +515. 7% versus ESCA's +136. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ESCA or MCRI or JPM or DKNG or BAC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.

(MCRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 72% more volatile than MCRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (MCRI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ESCA or MCRI or JPM or DKNG or BAC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.

(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus -4. 5% for Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ESCA or MCRI or JPM or DKNG or BAC?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 0. 1% for DraftKings Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ESCA or MCRI or JPM or DKNG or BAC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (MCRI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 57x versus Bank of America Corporation's 0. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 122. 9x for DraftKings Inc. — 110. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKNG: 23. 3% to $35. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ESCA or MCRI or JPM or DKNG or BAC?

In this comparison, ESCA (3.

2% yield), BAC (2. 3% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), MCRI (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DKNG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ESCA or MCRI or JPM or DKNG or BAC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.

(MCRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 0. 9% yield, +515. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCRI: +515. 7%, DKNG: +195. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ESCA and MCRI and JPM and DKNG and BAC?

These companies operate in different sectors (ESCA (Consumer Cyclical) and MCRI (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and BAC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ESCA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MCRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock. ESCA, MCRI, JPM, BAC pay a dividend while DKNG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.