Leisure
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ESCA vs SPWH vs CLAR vs MCRI vs PLBY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Leisure
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Leisure
ESCA vs SPWH vs CLAR vs MCRI vs PLBY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Specialty Retail | Leisure | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $256M | $48M | $119M | $2.31B | $134M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $240M | $1.22B | $252M | $545M | $122M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $-51M | $-45M | $101M | $-8M |
| Gross Margin | 27.1% | 30.0% | 32.6% | 53.0% | 70.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | -1.1% | -10.6% | 23.4% | -2.5% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | — | — | 19.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $20M | $427M | $12M | $26M | $196M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $2M | $37M | $96M | $38M |
ESCA vs SPWH vs CLAR vs MCRI vs PLBY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Escalade, Incorpora… (ESCA) | 100 | 102.8 | +2.8% |
| Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH) | 100 | 7.8 | -92.2% |
| Clarus Corporation (CLAR) | 100 | 24.6 | -75.4% |
| Monarch Casino & Re… (MCRI) | 100 | 280.4 | +180.4% |
| Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) | 100 | 14.6 | -85.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESCA vs SPWH vs CLAR vs MCRI vs PLBY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ESCA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 11.4%, current ratio 4.28x
- Beta 0.87, yield 3.2%, current ratio 4.28x
- Better valuation composite
SPWH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CLAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 3.2% yield, vs ESCA's 3.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
MCRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth 41.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs ESCA's 136.9%
- 4.4% revenue growth vs CLAR's -5.2%
- 18.6% margin vs CLAR's -17.7%
Among these 5 stocks, PLBY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.4% revenue growth vs CLAR's -5.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs CLAR's -17.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs PLBY's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs ESCA's 3.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.9% vs SPWH's -70.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.2% ROA vs CLAR's -16.8%, ROIC 21.8% vs -10.7% |
ESCA vs SPWH vs CLAR vs MCRI vs PLBY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ESCA vs SPWH vs CLAR vs MCRI vs PLBY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MCRI leads in 3 of 6 categories
SPWH leads 1 • CLAR leads 1 • ESCA leads 0 • PLBY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MCRI and PLBY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPWH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 9.9x PLBY's $122M. MCRI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLAR's -17.7%. On growth, PLBY holds the edge at +4.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $240M | $1.2B | $252M | $545M | $122M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $25M | -$18M | $182M | $5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | -$51M | -$45M | $101M | -$8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $31M | $13M | -$12M | $128M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | +30.0% | +32.6% | +53.0% | +70.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | -1.1% | -10.6% | +23.4% | -2.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | -4.2% | -17.7% | +18.6% | -6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +1.1% | -4.9% | +23.6% | -1.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.6% | +2.8% | +2.5% | +4.1% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.2% | 0.0% | +35.7% | -8.1% | +69.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SPWH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.8x trailing earnings, ESCA trades at a 21% valuation discount to MCRI's 23.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ESCA's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLBY's 121.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $256M | $48M | $119M | $2.3B | $134M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $264M | $473M | $95M | $2.2B | $293M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.82x | -0.95x | -2.56x | 23.76x | -11.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.25x | — | — | 19.52x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.70x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.11x | 18.80x | — | 11.70x | 121.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.07x | 0.04x | 0.48x | 4.23x | 1.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 0.25x | 0.61x | 4.50x | 7.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.00x | 5.40x | — | 17.97x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCRI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCRI delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-80 for PLBY. MCRI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLBY's 10.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESCA scores 8/9 vs CLAR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.0% | -26.2% | -21.2% | +18.7% | -79.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | -5.9% | -16.8% | +14.2% | -2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | -1.6% | -10.7% | +21.8% | -2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | -2.6% | -11.5% | +24.7% | -2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 2.26x | 0.06x | 0.05x | 10.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $425M | -$24M | -$71M | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $2M | $37M | $96M | $38M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $427M | $12M | $26M | $196M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 37.31x | -2.69x | — | 225.55x | -0.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCRI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCRI five years ago would be worth $19,808 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $366 for PLBY. Over the past 12 months, MCRI leads with a +53.9% total return vs SPWH's -70.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCRI at 24.2% vs SPWH's -37.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.3% | -15.8% | -6.3% | +35.0% | -21.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.2% | -70.1% | -10.6% | +53.9% | -4.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.9% | -74.9% | -59.3% | +91.6% | -17.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.6% | -93.1% | -85.5% | +98.1% | -96.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.9% | -84.7% | -9.4% | +515.7% | -85.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.4% | -37.0% | -25.9% | +24.2% | -6.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MCRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLBY's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCRI currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs SPWH's 28.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.62x | 1.37x | 0.55x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.32 | $4.33 | $4.03 | $130.85 | $2.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.41 | $1.08 | $2.52 | $82.18 | $1.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.4% | +28.4% | +76.9% | +98.6% | +52.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 43.0 | 57.6 | 74.5 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35K | 796K | 202K | 136K | 885K |
Analyst Outlook
CLAR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ESCA as "Buy", CLAR as "Hold", MCRI as "Hold", PLBY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 777.1% upside for PLBY (target: $13) vs -19.0% for MCRI (target: $105). For income investors, CLAR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.23% vs MCRI's 0.91%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $3.95 | $104.50 | $12.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | — | 11 | 9 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | — | +3.2% | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | — | $0.10 | $1.17 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +0.4% | +0.0% | +3.2% | 0.0% |
MCRI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SPWH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ESCA vs SPWH vs CLAR vs MCRI vs PLBY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESCA or SPWH or CLAR or MCRI or PLBY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Clarus Corporation (CLAR). Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (17. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ESCA or SPWH or CLAR or MCRI or PLBY?
On trailing P/E, Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) is the cheapest at 18.
8x versus Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. at 23. 8x. On forward P/E, Escalade, Incorporated is actually cheaper at 17. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ESCA or SPWH or CLAR or MCRI or PLBY?
Over the past 5 years, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) delivered a total return of +98. 1%, compared to -96. 3% for Playboy, Inc. (PLBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCRI returned +515. 7% versus PLBY's -85. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ESCA or SPWH or CLAR or MCRI or PLBY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Playboy, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning PLBY is approximately 202% more volatile than MCRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (MCRI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 11% for Playboy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ESCA or SPWH or CLAR or MCRI or PLBY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus -5. 2% for Clarus Corporation (CLAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Playboy, Inc. grew EPS 87. 5% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MCRI leads at 4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ESCA or SPWH or CLAR or MCRI or PLBY?
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus -18. 6% for Clarus Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCRI leads at 25. 1% versus -10. 7% for CLAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBY leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ESCA or SPWH or CLAR or MCRI or PLBY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) trades at 17.
3x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBY: 777. 1% to $12. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — ESCA or SPWH or CLAR or MCRI or PLBY?
In this comparison, CLAR (3.
2% yield), ESCA (3. 2% yield), MCRI (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SPWH, PLBY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ESCA or SPWH or CLAR or MCRI or PLBY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 0. 9% yield, +515. 7% 10Y return). Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCRI: +515. 7%, PLBY: -85. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ESCA and SPWH and CLAR and MCRI and PLBY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ESCA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLAR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MCRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ESCA, CLAR, MCRI pay a dividend while SPWH, PLBY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.