Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ESTA vs ATEC vs XTNT vs SYK vs ZBH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ESTA
Establishment Labs Holdings Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • CR
Market Cap$2.11B
5Y Perf.+264.7%
ATEC
Alphatec Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.+69.0%
XTNT
Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareAMEX • US
Market Cap$73M
5Y Perf.-57.7%
SYK
Stryker Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$109.33B
5Y Perf.+45.8%
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$16.12B
5Y Perf.-32.8%

ESTA vs ATEC vs XTNT vs SYK vs ZBH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ESTA logoESTA
ATEC logoATEC
XTNT logoXTNT
SYK logoSYK
ZBH logoZBH
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$2.11B$1.14B$73M$109.33B$16.12B
Revenue (TTM)$230M$595M$133M$25.12B$8.41B
Net Income (TTM)$-44M$-125M$2M$3.25B$761M
Gross Margin70.1%89.6%62.0%63.5%70.0%
Operating Margin-12.4%-9.6%4.8%22.4%15.6%
Forward P/E24.1x19.1x9.7x
Total Debt$264M$620M$35M$14.86B$7.52B
Cash & Equiv.$76M$161M$6M$4.01B$592M

ESTA vs ATEC vs XTNT vs SYK vs ZBHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ESTA
ATEC
XTNT
SYK
ZBH
StockMay 20May 26Return
Establishment Labs … (ESTA)100364.7+264.7%
Alphatec Holdings, … (ATEC)100169.0+69.0%
Xtant Medical Holdi… (XTNT)10042.3-57.7%
Stryker Corporation (SYK)100145.8+45.8%
Zimmer Biomet Holdi… (ZBH)10067.2-32.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ESTA vs ATEC vs XTNT vs SYK vs ZBH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SYK leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. XTNT and ZBH also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ESTA
Establishment Labs Holdings Inc.
The Momentum Pick

ESTA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +106.2% vs ATEC's -41.0%
Best for: momentum
ATEC
Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ATEC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 215.7% 10Y total return vs ESTA's 190.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
XTNT
Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

XTNT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth 107.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.5%
  • 28.4% revenue growth vs ZBH's 7.2%
Best for: growth exposure
SYK
Stryker Corporation
The Income Pick

SYK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 1.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 66.3%, current ratio 1.89x
  • Beta 0.52, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.89x
  • 12.9% margin vs ATEC's -21.1%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

ZBH is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (9.7x vs 19.1x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthXTNT logoXTNT28.4% revenue growth vs ZBH's 7.2%
ValueZBH logoZBHLower P/E (9.7x vs 19.1x)
Quality / MarginsSYK logoSYK12.9% margin vs ATEC's -21.1%
Stability / SafetySYK logoSYKBeta 0.52 vs ESTA's 1.27, lower leverage
DividendsSYK logoSYK1.2% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs ZBH's 1.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ESTA logoESTA+106.2% vs ATEC's -41.0%
Efficiency (ROA)SYK logoSYK6.9% ROA vs ATEC's -15.8%, ROIC 11.4% vs -12.6%

ESTA vs ATEC vs XTNT vs SYK vs ZBH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ESTAEstablishment Labs Holdings Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ATECAlphatec Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Products And Services
100.0%$764M
XTNTXtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Orthobiologics
56.6%$66M
Spinal Implant
42.1%$49M
License Revenue
1.3%$2M
SYKStryker Corporation
FY 2025
MedSurg
62.3%$15.6B
Orthopaedics
37.7%$9.5B
ZBHZimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Knees
43.9%$3.3B
S E T
28.4%$2.2B
Hips
27.7%$2.1B

ESTA vs ATEC vs XTNT vs SYK vs ZBH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSYKLAGGINGXTNT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SYK leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

SYK is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.1B annually — 188.7x XTNT's $133M. SYK is the more profitable business, keeping 12.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATEC's -21.1%. On growth, ESTA holds the edge at +44.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricESTA logoESTAEstablishment Lab…ATEC logoATECAlphatec Holdings…XTNT logoXTNTXtant Medical Hol…SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…ZBH logoZBHZimmer Biomet Hol…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$230M$595M$133M$25.1B$8.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$24M$4M$11M$6.3B$2.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$44M-$125M$2M$3.2B$761M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$42M$7M$5M$4.3B$1.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.1%+89.6%+62.0%+63.5%+70.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.4%-9.6%+4.8%+22.4%+15.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-19.1%-21.1%+1.3%+12.9%+9.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-18.3%+1.2%+3.9%+17.1%+21.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+44.7%-100.0%+19.0%+11.4%+9.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+35.7%+37.1%+123.7%+56.0%+34.1%
SYK leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ZBH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 23.2x trailing earnings, ZBH trades at a 32% valuation discount to SYK's 34.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ZBH's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATEC's 3672.1x.

MetricESTA logoESTAEstablishment Lab…ATEC logoATECAlphatec Holdings…XTNT logoXTNTXtant Medical Hol…SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…ZBH logoZBHZimmer Biomet Hol…
Market CapShares × price$2.1B$1.1B$73M$109.3B$16.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.3B$1.6B$102M$120.2B$23.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-41.73x-7.83x-4.33x33.98x23.19x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.13x19.06x9.71x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.29x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3672.06x19.76x9.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.99x1.49x0.62x4.35x1.96x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share90.29x31.32x1.62x4.87x1.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF410.02x25.53x10.95x
ZBH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SYK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SYK delivers a 15.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ATEC. ZBH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATEC's 17.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATEC scores 6/9 vs XTNT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricESTA logoESTAEstablishment Lab…ATEC logoATECAlphatec Holdings…XTNT logoXTNTXtant Medical Hol…SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…ZBH logoZBHZimmer Biomet Hol…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.3%-4.4%+3.8%+15.0%+5.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-12.7%-15.8%+1.8%+6.9%+3.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-14.6%-12.6%-12.8%+11.4%+5.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-14.1%-13.7%-17.9%+13.0%+6.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946265
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage11.23x17.21x0.82x0.66x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$189M$459M$29M$10.8B$6.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$76M$161M$6M$4.0B$592M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$264M$620M$35M$14.9B$7.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.96x-3.29x1.55x6.72x4.08x
SYK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ESTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SYK five years ago would be worth $11,752 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,114 for XTNT. Over the past 12 months, ESTA leads with a +106.2% total return vs ATEC's -41.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ESTA at 2.0% vs ATEC's -20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricESTA logoESTAEstablishment Lab…ATEC logoATECAlphatec Holdings…XTNT logoXTNTXtant Medical Hol…SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…ZBH logoZBHZimmer Biomet Hol…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.3%-63.8%-30.7%-17.8%-8.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+106.2%-41.0%-3.2%-24.5%-12.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+6.0%-49.4%-20.0%+2.4%-38.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+5.2%-46.4%-68.9%+17.5%-47.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+190.0%+215.7%-98.0%+179.2%-18.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+2.0%-20.3%-7.2%+0.8%-14.7%
ESTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ESTA and SYK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SYK is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ESTA's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ESTA currently trades 86.1% from its 52-week high vs ATEC's 32.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricESTA logoESTAEstablishment Lab…ATEC logoATECAlphatec Holdings…XTNT logoXTNTXtant Medical Hol…SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…ZBH logoZBHZimmer Biomet Hol…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.27x0.74x0.67x0.52x0.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$83.31$23.29$0.95$404.87$108.29
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$33.30$6.85$0.44$284.97$79.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+86.1%+32.3%+54.7%+70.5%+76.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.433.458.626.636.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded452K3.1M147K2.1M2.2M
Evenly matched — ESTA and SYK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SYK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ESTA as "Buy", ATEC as "Buy", SYK as "Buy", ZBH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 162.1% upside for ATEC (target: $20) vs 17.0% for ZBH (target: $96). For income investors, SYK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.18% vs ZBH's 1.16%.

MetricESTA logoESTAEstablishment Lab…ATEC logoATECAlphatec Holdings…XTNT logoXTNTXtant Medical Hol…SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…ZBH logoZBHZimmer Biomet Hol…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$85.00$19.71$389.62$96.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts14185042
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises340
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.36$0.96
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.0%
SYK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SYK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZBH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallStryker Corporation (SYK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ESTA vs ATEC vs XTNT vs SYK vs ZBH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ESTA or ATEC or XTNT or SYK or ZBH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.

(XTNT) is the stronger pick with 28. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. (ESTA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ESTA or ATEC or XTNT or SYK or ZBH?

On trailing P/E, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.

(ZBH) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus Stryker Corporation at 34. 0x. On forward P/E, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ESTA or ATEC or XTNT or SYK or ZBH?

Over the past 5 years, Stryker Corporation (SYK) delivered a total return of +17.

5%, compared to -68. 9% for Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc. (XTNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATEC returned +215. 7% versus XTNT's -98. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ESTA or ATEC or XTNT or SYK or ZBH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

52β versus Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning ESTA is approximately 143% more volatile than SYK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 17% for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ESTA or ATEC or XTNT or SYK or ZBH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.

(XTNT) is pulling ahead at 28. 4% versus 7. 2% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. grew EPS 42. 7% year-over-year, compared to -19. 9% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATEC leads at 29. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ESTA or ATEC or XTNT or SYK or ZBH?

Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more profitable company, earning 12.

9% net margin versus -24. 2% for Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYK leads at 19. 5% versus -18. 5% for ESTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATEC leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ESTA or ATEC or XTNT or SYK or ZBH more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.

(ZBH) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 1x for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATEC: 162. 1% to $19. 71.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ESTA or ATEC or XTNT or SYK or ZBH?

In this comparison, SYK (1.

2% yield), ZBH (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ESTA, ATEC, XTNT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ESTA or ATEC or XTNT or SYK or ZBH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

52), 1. 2% yield, +179. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +179. 2%, ESTA: +190. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ESTA and ATEC and XTNT and SYK and ZBH?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ESTA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATEC is a small-cap high-growth stock; XTNT is a small-cap high-growth stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ZBH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYK, ZBH pay a dividend while ESTA, ATEC, XTNT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ESTA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 22%
  • Gross Margin > 42%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATEC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 53%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XTNT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SYK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ZBH

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ESTA and ATEC and XTNT and SYK and ZBH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ESTA: 44.7% · ATEC: -100.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.