Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ETON vs AVDL vs JPM vs PRAX vs SUPN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Banks - Diversified
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
ETON vs AVDL vs JPM vs PRAX vs SUPN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Banks - Diversified | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $890M | $2.10B | $908.57B | $8.15B | $2.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $87M | $249M | $280.33B | $0.00 | $777M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-278K | $57.05B | $-327M | $-29M |
| Gross Margin | 54.8% | 94.5% | 60.0% | — | 89.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | 1.8% | 25.9% | — | -5.5% |
| Forward P/E | 40.5x | 28.3x | 14.6x | — | 17.8x |
| Total Debt | $31M | $2M | $942.38B | $110K | $41M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $51M | $343.34B | $357M | $128M |
ETON vs AVDL vs JPM vs PRAX vs SUPN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eton Pharmaceutical… (ETON) | 100 | 445.5 | +345.5% |
| Avadel Pharmaceutic… (AVDL) | 100 | 427.6 | +327.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 331.7 | +231.7% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 53.8 | -46.2% |
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 241.7 | +141.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ETON vs AVDL vs JPM vs PRAX vs SUPN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ETON is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 419.7% 10Y total return vs JPM's 481.2%
AVDL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 74.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 2.3%, current ratio 2.75x
- Beta 0.15, current ratio 2.75x
- 5.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.8%
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 17.8x)
- 20.4% margin vs SUPN's -3.7%
- 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +5.6% vs JPM's +20.9%
Among these 5 stocks, SUPN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 17.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs SUPN's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs PRAX's 1.49 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.6% vs JPM's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs -65.0% |
ETON vs AVDL vs JPM vs PRAX vs SUPN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ETON vs AVDL vs JPM vs PRAX vs SUPN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • ETON leads 0 • AVDL leads 0 • SUPN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUPN's -3.7%. On growth, AVDL holds the edge at +54.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $87M | $249M | $280.3B | $0 | $777M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $8M | $81.4B | -$357M | $29M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$278,000 | $57.0B | -$327M | -$29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15M | $35M | $100.9B | -$283M | $82M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.8% | +94.5% | +60.0% | — | +89.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +1.8% | +25.9% | — | -5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | -0.1% | +20.4% | — | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +14.2% | +36.0% | — | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.4% | +54.9% | — | — | +38.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +185.5% | +100.7% | +16.0% | +2.7% | +81.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ETON's 217.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $890M | $2.1B | $908.6B | $8.2B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $895M | $2.1B | $1.51T | $7.8B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -191.06x | -42.43x | 16.22x | -20.94x | -65.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.46x | 28.28x | 14.60x | — | 17.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.92x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 217.39x | — | 18.52x | — | 45.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.13x | 12.44x | 3.25x | — | 3.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 33.42x | 27.88x | 2.51x | 7.24x | 2.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 87.30x | — | 9.01x | — | 55.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ETON scores 5/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.7% | -0.3% | +15.9% | -43.0% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.5% | -0.2% | +1.3% | -40.2% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | -76.3% | +4.5% | -65.0% | -2.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.1% | -34.9% | +8.9% | -49.3% | -3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.19x | 0.02x | 2.60x | 0.00x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | -$50M | $599.0B | -$357M | -$87M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $51M | $343.3B | $357M | $128M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $31M | $2M | $942.4B | $110,000 | $41M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.96x | 0.66x | 0.74x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ETON five years ago would be worth $54,314 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,746 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +557.0% total return vs JPM's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 157.7% vs SUPN's 9.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +99.8% | +0.6% | +0.8% | -1.4% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.1% | +132.2% | +20.9% | +557.0% | +34.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +720.2% | +49.4% | +138.8% | +1611.0% | +32.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +443.1% | +175.7% | +135.5% | -12.5% | +38.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +419.7% | +127.8% | +481.2% | -32.3% | +142.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +101.7% | +14.3% | +33.7% | +157.7% | +9.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVDL and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVDL is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs SUPN's 74.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.15x | 0.87x | 1.49x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.58 | $23.57 | $338.09 | $366.52 | $59.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.09 | $8.52 | $269.72 | $37.19 | $30.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +91.8% | +96.2% | +77.0% | +74.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 61.8 | 72.1 | 42.5 | 34.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 364K | 0 | 7.4M | 407K | 598K |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ETON as "Buy", AVDL as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", SUPN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 106.9% upside for PRAX (target: $584) vs -1.0% for AVDL (target: $21). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $21.43 | $339.75 | $584.00 | $60.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 14 | 61 | 16 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 15 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ETON vs AVDL vs JPM vs PRAX vs SUPN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ETON or AVDL or JPM or PRAX or SUPN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is the stronger pick with 504.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ETON) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ETON or AVDL or JPM or PRAX or SUPN?
On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
is actually cheaper at 14. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ETON or AVDL or JPM or PRAX or SUPN?
Over the past 5 years, Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ETON) delivered a total return of +443. 1%, compared to -12. 5% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus PRAX's -32. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ETON or AVDL or JPM or PRAX or SUPN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
15β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 49β — meaning PRAX is approximately 881% more volatile than AVDL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ETON or AVDL or JPM or PRAX or SUPN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is pulling ahead at 504.
8% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc grew EPS 74. 5% year-over-year, compared to -151. 5% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ETON leads at 55. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ETON or AVDL or JPM or PRAX or SUPN?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -28. 9% for Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -25. 1% for AVDL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVDL leads at 91. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ETON or AVDL or JPM or PRAX or SUPN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 40. 5x for Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 25. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 106. 9% to $584. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ETON or AVDL or JPM or PRAX or SUPN?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ETON, AVDL, PRAX, SUPN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ETON or AVDL or JPM or PRAX or SUPN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, PRAX: -32. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ETON and AVDL and JPM and PRAX and SUPN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ETON (Healthcare) and AVDL (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and PRAX (Healthcare) and SUPN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ETON is a small-cap high-growth stock; AVDL is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while ETON, AVDL, PRAX, SUPN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.