Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EVC vs IHRT vs CMLS vs FOX vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Broadcasting
Broadcasting
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
EVC vs IHRT vs CMLS vs FOX vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Broadcasting | Broadcasting | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $639M | $880M | $87K | $13.28B | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $553M | $3.86B | $772M | $16.58B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $-473M | $-297M | $1.89B | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 78.5% | 62.7% | 33.1% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -0.5% | -31.3% | 19.0% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 12.2x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $214M | $5.79B | $795M | $7.46B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $59M | $271K | $64M | $5.35B | $30.71B |
EVC vs IHRT vs CMLS vs FOX vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entravision Communi… (EVC) | 100 | 463.0 | +363.0% |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| Fox Corporation (FOX) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EVC vs IHRT vs CMLS vs FOX vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EVC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.6%, EPS growth 48.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 22.6% revenue growth vs CMLS's -2.1%
- 2.9% yield, vs FOX's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
IHRT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +415.5% vs CMLS's -96.2%
Among these 5 stocks, CMLS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FOX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 60.4%, current ratio 2.91x
- PEG 0.49 vs GOOGL's 0.99
- Beta 0.51, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.91x
GOOGL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs FOX's 104.9%
- 37.9% margin vs CMLS's -38.4%
- 27.4% ROA vs CMLS's -27.1%, ROIC 25.1% vs -20.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.6% revenue growth vs CMLS's -2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.2x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.49 vs 0.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs CMLS's -38.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs CMLS's 1.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, vs FOX's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +415.5% vs CMLS's -96.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs CMLS's -27.1%, ROIC 25.1% vs -20.5% |
EVC vs IHRT vs CMLS vs FOX vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EVC vs IHRT vs CMLS vs FOX vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories
FOX leads 1 • EVC leads 0 • IHRT leads 0 • CMLS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 764.5x EVC's $553M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMLS's -38.4%. On growth, EVC holds the edge at +114.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $553M | $3.9B | $772M | $16.6B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $339M | -$185M | $3.5B | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | -$473M | -$297M | $1.9B | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $11M | -$10M | $2.5B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +78.5% | +62.7% | +33.1% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -0.5% | -31.3% | +19.0% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | -12.2% | -38.4% | +11.4% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +0.3% | -1.3% | +15.3% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.4% | +0.8% | -11.5% | +2.0% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +124.5% | -20.8% | -91.8% | -35.8% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FOX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, FOX trades at a 69% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FOX offers better value at 0.46x vs GOOGL's 1.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $639M | $880M | $87,200 | $13.3B | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $793M | $6.7B | $731M | $15.4B | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.08x | -1.86x | -0.00x | 11.51x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 12.20x | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.46x | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 61.58x | 19.65x | — | 4.26x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 0.23x | 0.00x | 0.81x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.42x | — | 0.01x | 2.11x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 181.90x | 80.64x | — | 4.44x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-193 for CMLS. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMLS's 114.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOX scores 8/9 vs CMLS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.1% | — | -193.0% | +17.0% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.4% | -12.0% | -27.1% | +8.8% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | -0.4% | -20.5% | +16.5% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.2% | -0.5% | -21.0% | +16.4% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.85x | — | 114.33x | 0.60x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $154M | $5.8B | $731M | $2.1B | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $59M | $270,900 | $64M | $5.4B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $214M | $5.8B | $795M | $7.5B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.47x | -0.17x | -0.03x | 8.91x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for CMLS. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +415.5% total return vs CMLS's -96.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs CMLS's -87.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +133.2% | +36.6% | -93.2% | -13.9% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +272.1% | +415.5% | -96.2% | +20.6% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.8% | +85.9% | -99.8% | +96.6% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.3% | -75.0% | -100.0% | +59.0% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.0% | -68.5% | -100.0% | +104.9% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.2% | +23.0% | -87.6% | +25.3% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FOX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOX is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMLS's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs CMLS's 2.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.82x | 1.87x | 0.51x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.35 | $6.56 | $0.20 | $68.17 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.81 | $1.08 | $0.00 | $46.26 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.2% | +86.4% | +2.5% | +82.9% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 95.7 | 68.6 | 25.5 | 51.1 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 986K | 1.4M | 1.4M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EVC and FOX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EVC as "Hold", IHRT as "Buy", FOX as "Hold", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.8% upside for FOX (target: $79) vs -38.3% for IHRT (target: $4). For income investors, EVC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.88% vs IHRT's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 | — | $79.00 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 10 | — | 42 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +0.2% | — | +1.1% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $0.01 | — | $0.60 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +100.0% | +7.5% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
EVC vs IHRT vs CMLS vs FOX vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EVC or IHRT or CMLS or FOX or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Entravision Communications Corporation (EVC) is the stronger pick with 22.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 1% for Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS). Fox Corporation (FOX) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (12. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EVC or IHRT or CMLS or FOX or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the cheapest at 11.
5x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Fox Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fox Corporation wins at 0. 49x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EVC or IHRT or CMLS or FOX or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus CMLS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EVC or IHRT or CMLS or FOX or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fox Corporation (FOX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Cumulus Media Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning CMLS is approximately 263% more volatile than FOX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 114% for Cumulus Media Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EVC or IHRT or CMLS or FOX or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Entravision Communications Corporation (EVC) is pulling ahead at 22.
6% versus -2. 1% for Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fox Corporation grew EPS 56. 9% year-over-year, compared to -145. 8% for Cumulus Media Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOGL leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EVC or IHRT or CMLS or FOX or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -34. 2% for Cumulus Media Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -29. 0% for CMLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IHRT leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EVC or IHRT or CMLS or FOX or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fox Corporation (FOX) trades at 12. 2x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Alphabet Inc. — 17. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOX: 39. 8% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EVC or IHRT or CMLS or FOX or GOOGL?
In this comparison, EVC (2.
9% yield), FOX (1. 1% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield), IHRT (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CMLS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EVC or IHRT or CMLS or FOX or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 1. 1% yield, +104. 9% 10Y return). Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOX: +104. 9%, CMLS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EVC and IHRT and CMLS and FOX and GOOGL?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EVC is a small-cap high-growth stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. EVC, FOX pay a dividend while IHRT, CMLS, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 57%
- Gross Margin > 18%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.