Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EVH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PINC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
EVH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PINC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $488M | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $2.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.89B | $0.00 | $1.56B | $1.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-497M | $-168M | $153M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 14.0% | — | 65.4% | 72.6% |
| Operating Margin | -27.4% | — | 12.3% | -0.0% |
| Forward P/E | 31.2x | — | 24.8x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $990M | $22M | $70M | $282M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $152M | $194M | $1.12B | $84M |
EVH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PINC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 216.4 | +116.4% |
| Premier, Inc. (PINC) | 100 | 80.8 | -19.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EVH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PINC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EVH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +110.4% vs EVH's -59.0%
ALKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -5.2%, EPS growth -34.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- -5.2% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- 9.8% margin vs EVH's -26.3%
PINC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 3.0%
- -4.6% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -11.0%
- Beta 0.07, yield 3.0%, current ratio 0.64x
- Lower P/E (20.8x vs 24.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.2% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.8x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs EVH's -26.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs DBVT's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EVH's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs EVH's -59.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
EVH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PINC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EVH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PINC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories
PINC leads 2 • EVH leads 1 • DBVT leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EVH and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EVH's -26.3%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $0 | $1.6B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$403M | -$112M | $212M | $118M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$497M | -$168M | $153M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | -$151M | $392M | $265M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | — | +65.4% | +72.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.4% | — | +12.3% | -0.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.3% | — | +9.8% | -2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | — | +25.1% | +26.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | — | +28.2% | -3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.9% | +91.5% | -4.1% | -70.0% |
Valuation Metrics
EVH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.8x trailing earnings, ALKS trades at a 81% valuation discount to PINC's 128.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EVH's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PINC's 21.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $488M | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.84x | -0.76x | 24.76x | 128.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.17x | — | — | 20.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.90x | — | 17.25x | 21.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | — | 4.00x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 0.66x | 3.28x | 1.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 102.63x | — | 12.28x | 7.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EVH's 2.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs PINC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -77.9% | -130.2% | +8.8% | -1.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.8% | -89.0% | +5.4% | -0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | — | +18.9% | +0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | -145.7% | +14.2% | +0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.38x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $838M | -$172M | -$1.0B | $198M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $152M | $194M | $1.1B | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $990M | $22M | $70M | $282M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.04x | -189.82x | 32.30x | 1.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,156 for EVH. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs EVH's -59.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs EVH's -50.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.0% | +4.9% | +25.3% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.0% | +110.4% | +16.5% | +24.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | +19.7% | +14.5% | +14.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.4% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -9.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.6% | -87.0% | -11.0% | -4.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.2% | +6.2% | +4.6% | +4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
PINC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PINC is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PINC currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs EVH's 35.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.07 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $28.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $20.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.5% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 65.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 252K | 2.3M | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
PINC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EVH as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", PINC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs -0.0% for PINC (target: $28). For income investors, PINC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.98% vs EVH's 2.28%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.38 | $46.33 | $44.00 | $28.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 15 | 28 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | — | — | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | — | — | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.2% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +17.1% |
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PINC leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
EVH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PINC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EVH or DBVT or ALKS or PINC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the stronger pick with -5.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 6% for Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EVH or DBVT or ALKS or PINC?
On trailing P/E, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the cheapest at 24.
8x versus Premier, Inc. at 128. 5x. On forward P/E, Premier, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EVH or DBVT or ALKS or PINC?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -78. 4% for Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PINC returned -4. 6% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EVH or DBVT or ALKS or PINC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Premier, Inc.
(PINC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 1671% more volatile than PINC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for Evolent Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EVH or DBVT or ALKS or PINC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkermes plc (ALKS) is pulling ahead at -5.
2% versus -26. 6% for Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alkermes plc grew EPS -34. 1% year-over-year, compared to -525. 9% for Evolent Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVH leads at 11. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EVH or DBVT or ALKS or PINC?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -28. 5% for Evolent Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -0. 2% for EVH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EVH or DBVT or ALKS or PINC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Premier, Inc.
(PINC) trades at 20. 8x forward P/E versus 31. 2x for Evolent Health, Inc. — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — EVH or DBVT or ALKS or PINC?
In this comparison, PINC (3.
0% yield), EVH (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. DBVT, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EVH or DBVT or ALKS or PINC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Premier, Inc.
(PINC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PINC: -4. 6%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EVH and DBVT and ALKS and PINC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
EVH, PINC pay a dividend while DBVT, ALKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.