EVI vs DXPE

For growth investors, DXP Enterprises, Inc.

(DXPE) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 3% for EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI). DXP Enterprises, Inc. (DXPE) offers the better valuation at 28. 0x trailing P/E (24. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, DXP Enterprises, Inc.

(DXPE) is the cheapest at 28. 0x versus EVI Industries, Inc. at 41. 0x. On forward P/E, DXP Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 5x.

Over the past 5 years, DXP Enterprises, Inc.

(DXPE) delivered a total return of +364. 9%, compared to -21. 2% for EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DXPE returned +699. 3% versus EVI's +455. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EVI Industries, Inc.

(EVI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 50β versus DXP Enterprises, Inc. 's 1. 62β — meaning DXPE is approximately 8% more volatile than EVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 197% for DXP Enterprises, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), DXP Enterprises, Inc.

(DXPE) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus 10. 3% for EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: EVI Industries, Inc. grew EPS 32. 4% year-over-year, compared to 27. 0% for DXP Enterprises, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVI leads at 13. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

DXP Enterprises, Inc.

(DXPE) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 4% net margin versus 1. 9% for EVI Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DXPE leads at 8. 8% versus 3. 5% for EVI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DXPE leads at 31. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, DXP Enterprises, Inc.

(DXPE) trades at 24. 5x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for EVI Industries, Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVI: 64. 2% to $33. 00.

In this comparison, EVI (1.

7% yield) pays a dividend. DXPE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, EVI Industries, Inc.

(EVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 7% yield, +455. 1% 10Y return). DXP Enterprises, Inc. (DXPE) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVI: +455. 1%, DXPE: +699. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

EVI pays a dividend while DXPE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.