Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EVI vs MIDD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
EVI vs MIDD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $259M | $7.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $427M | $3.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-278M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | -2.5% |
| Forward P/E | 31.4x | 17.0x |
| Total Debt | $65M | $2.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $222M |
EVI vs MIDD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI) | 100 | 102.2 | +2.2% |
| The Middleby Corpor… (MIDD) | 100 | 232.3 | +132.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EVI vs MIDD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.50, yield 1.7%
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 32.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.4%
- 455.1% 10Y total return vs MIDD's 46.1%
MIDD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 78.3%, current ratio 2.57x
- Beta 1.22, current ratio 2.57x
- Lower P/E (17.0x vs 31.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.3% revenue growth vs MIDD's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.0x vs 31.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.7% margin vs MIDD's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs EVI's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.1% vs MIDD's +20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs MIDD's -4.1%, ROIC 5.8% vs 8.7% |
EVI vs MIDD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EVI vs MIDD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EVI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MIDD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 8.7x EVI's $427M. EVI is the more profitable business, keeping 1.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MIDD's -7.4%. On growth, EVI holds the edge at +24.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $427M | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $26M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$278M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $559M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | -2.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | -7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.4% | -14.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +131.3% | -64.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MIDD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MIDD's 13.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EVI's 15.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $259M | $7.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $314M | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.02x | -29.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.41x | 17.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.78x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.37x | 13.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 2.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.84x | 2.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.76x | 13.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EVI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EVI delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-9 for MIDD. EVI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MIDD's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVI scores 6/9 vs MIDD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | -8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.8% | -4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $56M | $2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $222M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65M | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.96x | -1.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MIDD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MIDD five years ago would be worth $8,654 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,879 for EVI. Over the past 12 months, EVI leads with a +24.1% total return vs MIDD's +20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MIDD at 2.8% vs EVI's 1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.5% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.1% | +20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.3% | +8.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.2% | -13.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +455.1% | +46.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.4% | +2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MIDD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MIDD is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EVI's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MIDD currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs EVI's 57.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.82 | $169.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.59 | $110.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.7% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 52.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 30K | 571K |
Analyst Outlook
EVI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EVI as "Buy" and MIDD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.2% upside for EVI (target: $33) vs 11.7% for MIDD (target: $177). EVI is the only dividend payer here at 1.74% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.00 | $176.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +9.8% |
EVI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MIDD leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
EVI vs MIDD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EVI or MIDD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EVI Industries, Inc.
(EVI) is the stronger pick with 10. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI) offers the better valuation at 41. 0x trailing P/E (31. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EVI or MIDD?
On forward P/E, The Middleby Corporation is actually cheaper at 17.
0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EVI or MIDD?
Over the past 5 years, The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) delivered a total return of -13.
5%, compared to -21. 2% for EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVI returned +455. 1% versus MIDD's +46. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EVI or MIDD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
22β versus EVI Industries, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning EVI is approximately 24% more volatile than MIDD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 78% for The Middleby Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EVI or MIDD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVI Industries, Inc.
(EVI) is pulling ahead at 10. 3% versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: EVI Industries, Inc. grew EPS 32. 4% year-over-year, compared to -168. 1% for The Middleby Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVI leads at 13. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EVI or MIDD?
EVI Industries, Inc.
(EVI) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 9% net margin versus -8. 7% for The Middleby Corporation — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MIDD leads at 18. 4% versus 3. 5% for EVI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MIDD leads at 39. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EVI or MIDD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) trades at 17.
0x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for EVI Industries, Inc. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVI: 64. 2% to $33. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EVI or MIDD?
In this comparison, EVI (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MIDD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EVI or MIDD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EVI Industries, Inc.
(EVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 7% yield, +455. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVI: +455. 1%, MIDD: +46. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EVI and MIDD?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
EVI pays a dividend while MIDD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.