EVO vs LSCC

For growth investors, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) is the stronger pick with 2.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Evotec SE (EVO). Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) offers the better valuation at 5377. 6x trailing P/E (114. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Evotec SE (EVO) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) delivered a total return of +137.

2%, compared to -85. 0% for Evotec SE (EVO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LSCC returned +22. 1% versus EVO's +132. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Evotec SE (EVO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

08β versus Lattice Semiconductor Corporation's 2. 48β — meaning LSCC is approximately 129% more volatile than EVO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 55% for Evotec SE — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) is pulling ahead at 2.

7% versus -5. 0% for Evotec SE (EVO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Evotec SE grew EPS 50. 0% year-over-year, compared to -94. 9% for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVO leads at 0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) is the more profitable company, earning 0.

6% net margin versus -13. 1% for Evotec SE — meaning it keeps 0. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LSCC leads at 2. 9% versus -17. 9% for EVO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LSCC leads at 68. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVO: 129.

5% to $7. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Evotec SE (EVO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

08), +132. 9% 10Y return). Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVO: +132. 9%, LSCC: +22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (EVO (Healthcare) and LSCC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.