Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EVTL vs WKHS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
EVTL vs WKHS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $274M | $32M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $11M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-245M | $-64M |
| Gross Margin | — | -236.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -5.6% |
| Total Debt | $191M | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $4M |
EVTL vs WKHS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vertical Aerospace … (EVTL) | 100 | 2.8 | -97.2% |
| Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EVTL vs WKHS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EVTL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 98.5%
- -97.2% 10Y total return vs WKHS's -99.8%
- 92.7% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5%
WKHS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.46
- Lower volatility, beta 1.46, Low D/E 36.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 1.46, current ratio 1.18x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 92.7% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs WKHS's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.46 vs EVTL's 3.45 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +236.1% vs EVTL's -35.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -60.6% ROA vs EVTL's -229.7% |
EVTL vs WKHS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EVTL vs WKHS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WKHS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WKHS and EVTL operate at a comparable scale, with $11M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $11M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$146M | -$52M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$245M | -$64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$97M | -$33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -2.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -106.9% | +95.9% |
Valuation Metrics
EVTL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $274M | $32M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $439M | $44M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.52x | -0.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WKHS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -198.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -60.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -77.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -107.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $121M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $191M | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -42.65x | -3.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EVTL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EVTL five years ago would be worth $273 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15 for WKHS. Over the past 12 months, WKHS leads with a +236.1% total return vs EVTL's -35.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EVTL at -46.0% vs WKHS's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.0% | -34.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.0% | +236.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | -98.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -99.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | -99.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.0% | -75.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EVTL and WKHS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WKHS is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EVTL's 3.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EVTL currently trades 35.3% from its 52-week high vs WKHS's 30.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.45x | 1.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.60 | $11.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.90 | $0.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.3% | +30.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.9 | 72.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 167K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% |
WKHS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EVTL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
EVTL vs WKHS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EVTL or WKHS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Vertical Aerospace Ltd.
(EVTL) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EVTL or WKHS?
Over the past 5 years, Vertical Aerospace Ltd.
(EVTL) delivered a total return of -97. 3%, compared to -99. 8% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTL returned -97. 2% versus WKHS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EVTL or WKHS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Workhorse Group Inc.
(WKHS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 46β versus Vertical Aerospace Ltd. 's 3. 45β — meaning EVTL is approximately 136% more volatile than WKHS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — EVTL or WKHS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertical Aerospace Ltd.
grew EPS 98. 5% year-over-year, compared to 65. 4% for Workhorse Group Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EVTL or WKHS?
Vertical Aerospace Ltd.
(EVTL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1538. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTL leads at 0. 0% versus -1116. 7% for WKHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EVTL leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — EVTL or WKHS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is EVTL or WKHS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Workhorse Group Inc.
(WKHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Vertical Aerospace Ltd. (EVTL) carries a higher beta of 3. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WKHS: -99. 8%, EVTL: -97. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between EVTL and WKHS?
These companies operate in different sectors (EVTL (Industrials) and WKHS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare EVTL vs JOBY
JOBY is one of the most direct listed alternatives to EVTL.
Compare WKHS vs RIVN
RIVN overlaps with WKHS in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With JOBY + ACHR
JOBY and ACHR are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.