EXK vs AG

For growth investors, First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is the stronger pick with 128. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) offers the better valuation at 60. 5x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Endeavour Silver Corp.

is actually cheaper at 13. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Endeavour Silver Corp.

(EXK) delivered a total return of +48. 5%, compared to +33. 6% for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXK returned +138. 7% versus AG's +105. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 56β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 71β — meaning EXK is approximately 10% more volatile than AG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is pulling ahead at 128. 2% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Majestic Silver Corp. grew EPS 202. 9% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AG leads at 26. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AG leads at 27. 8% versus 3. 8% for EXK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AG leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Endeavour Silver Corp.

(EXK) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for First Majestic Silver Corp. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXK: 36. 9% to $12. 75.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+105. 5% 10Y return). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AG: +105. 5%, EXK: +138. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.