Construction Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EXP vs AWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
EXP vs AWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Construction |
| Market Cap | $6.75B | $7.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.30B | $1.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $447M | $306M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 40.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.4% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 16.2x | 19.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.28B | $532M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $113M |
EXP vs AWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) | 100 | 314.2 | +214.2% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 218.0 | +118.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EXP vs AWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EXP is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (16.2x vs 19.8x)
- 19.4% margin vs AWI's 18.6%
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 308.0% 10Y total return vs EXP's 193.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% revenue growth vs EXP's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 19.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs AWI's 18.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs EXP's 1.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs EXP's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.4% vs EXP's -10.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs EXP's 13.1%, ROIC 24.9% vs 17.6% |
EXP vs AWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EXP vs AWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXP and AWI operate at a comparable scale, with $2.3B and $1.6B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.4% (EXP) to 18.6% (AWI). On growth, AWI holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $748M | $603M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $447M | $306M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $244M | $247M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +40.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | -1.9% |
Valuation Metrics
EXP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, EXP trades at a 34% valuation discount to AWI's 23.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EXP's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AWI's 17.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.8B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.0B | $7.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.23x | 23.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.24x | 19.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.29x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.57x | 17.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.99x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.84x | 7.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.12x | 28.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $29 for EXP. AWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXP's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs EXP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.1% | +34.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.1% | +16.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.6% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.9% | +26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $113M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $532M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.77x | 13.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AWI five years ago would be worth $16,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,903 for EXP. Over the past 12 months, AWI leads with a +10.4% total return vs EXP's -10.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 35.5% vs EXP's 9.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.7% | -16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.3% | +10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.9% | +148.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.0% | +62.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.9% | +308.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.9% | +35.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EXP and AWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXP's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXP currently trades 86.1% from its 52-week high vs AWI's 79.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $243.64 | $206.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $171.99 | $148.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.1% | +79.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 36.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 410K | 534K |
Analyst Outlook
AWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EXP as "Buy" and AWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.1% upside for AWI (target: $198) vs 6.9% for EXP (target: $224). For income investors, AWI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs EXP's 0.48%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $224.17 | $197.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.5% | +1.8% |
AWI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EXP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
EXP vs AWI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EXP or AWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EXP or AWI?
On trailing P/E, Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) is the cheapest at 15. 2x versus Armstrong World Industries, Inc. at 23. 2x. On forward P/E, Eagle Materials Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EXP or AWI?
Over the past 5 years, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) delivered a total return of +62. 5%, compared to +49. 0% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AWI returned +308. 0% versus EXP's +193. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EXP or AWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Eagle Materials Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning EXP is approximately 57% more volatile than AWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 88% for Eagle Materials Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EXP or AWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus 0. 1% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 2% for Eagle Materials Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWI leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EXP or AWI?
Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 19. 0% for Armstrong World Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus 26. 5% for EXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWI leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EXP or AWI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 19. 8x for Armstrong World Industries, Inc. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AWI: 20. 1% to $197. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — EXP or AWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) offers the highest yield at 0. 8%, versus 0. 5% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP).
09Is EXP or AWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 8% yield, +308. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +308. 0%, EXP: +193. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EXP and AWI?
These companies operate in different sectors (EXP (Basic Materials) and AWI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EXP is a small-cap deep-value stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AWI pays a dividend while EXP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.