Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FATN logo
FATN
DDOG logo
DDOG
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FATN vs DDOG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FATN
FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$85M
5Y Perf.
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$82.47B
5Y Perf.+133.5%

FATN vs DDOG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FATN logoFATN
DDOG logoDDOG
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Application
Market Cap$85M$82.47B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$3.67B
Net Income (TTM)$5M$136M
Gross Margin87.2%79.9%
Operating Margin18.7%-0.7%
Forward P/E20.8x95.6x
Total Debt$6M$1.54B
Cash & Equiv.$5M$401M

FATN vs DDOGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FATN
DDOG
StockMar 25Jun 26Return
FatPipe, Inc. Commo… (FATN)100Infinity+Infinity%
Datadog, Inc. (DDOG)100233.5+133.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FATN vs DDOG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FATN and DDOG are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Datadog, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FATN
FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock
The Defensive Pick

FATN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.17, Low D/E 22.6%, current ratio 3.85x
  • Lower P/E (20.8x vs 95.6x)
  • 25.9% margin vs DDOG's 3.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.
The Income Pick

DDOG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 1.32
  • Rev growth 27.7%, EPS growth -41.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
  • Beta 1.32, current ratio 3.38x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthDDOG logoDDOG27.7% revenue growth vs FATN's 17.9%
ValueFATN logoFATNLower P/E (20.8x vs 95.6x)
Quality / MarginsFATN logoFATN25.9% margin vs DDOG's 3.7%
Stability / SafetyDDOG logoDDOGBeta 1.32 vs FATN's 2.17
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DDOG logoDDOG+91.2% vs FATN's -24.3%
Efficiency (ROA)FATN logoFATN15.2% ROA vs DDOG's 2.1%, ROIC 11.9% vs -0.8%

FATN vs DDOG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Cloud Software Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Cloud Software Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FATNFatPipe, Inc. Common Stock
FY 2025
Product
67.9%$13M
Service
19.6%$4M
Consulting
12.5%$2M
DDOGDatadog, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FATN vs DDOG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFATNLAGGINGDDOG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FATN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

DDOG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 191.2x FATN's $19M. FATN is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DDOG's 3.7%. On growth, FATN holds the edge at +129.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$3.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M$73M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$136M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$788,908$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.2%+79.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.7%-0.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.9%+3.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.1%+29.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+129.5%+32.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+120.9%
FATN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FATN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 17.4x trailing earnings, FATN trades at a 98% valuation discount to DDOG's 772.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FATN's 21.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DDOG's 1069.7x.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$85M$82.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$86M$83.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.40x772.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.76x95.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.70x1069.69x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.45x24.06x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.38x22.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF82.42x
FATN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FATN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FATN delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $4 for DDOG. FATN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DDOG's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DDOG scores 6/9 vs FATN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+22.7%+3.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.2%+2.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.9%-0.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.8%-1.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.23x0.41x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$493,351$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$401M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$1.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.75x4.46x
FATN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — FATN and DDOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Over the past 12 months, DDOG leads with a +91.2% total return vs FATN's -24.3%.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+183.3%+73.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-24.3%+91.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+141.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+150.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+517.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+34.1%
Evenly matched — FATN and DDOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

DDOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

DDOG is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATN's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DDOG currently trades 83.1% from its 52-week high vs FATN's 55.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.17x1.32x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.90$278.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.31$98.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.9%+83.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.461.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M5.8M
DDOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates FATN as "Buy" and DDOG as "Buy".

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$209.58
# AnalystsCovering analysts147
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

FATN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DDOG leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallFatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FATN vs DDOG: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FATN or DDOG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Datadog, Inc.

(DDOG) is the stronger pick with 27. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 9% for FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) offers the better valuation at 17. 4x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FATN or DDOG?

On trailing P/E, FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is the cheapest at 17. 4x versus Datadog, Inc. at 772. 3x. On forward P/E, FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock is actually cheaper at 20. 8x.

03

Which is safer — FATN or DDOG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Datadog, Inc.

(DDOG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 17β — meaning FATN is approximately 65% more volatile than DDOG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 41% for Datadog, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — FATN or DDOG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Datadog, Inc.

(DDOG) is pulling ahead at 27. 7% versus 17. 9% for FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 133. 3% year-over-year, compared to -41. 2% for Datadog, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DDOG leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FATN or DDOG?

FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 9% net margin versus 3. 1% for Datadog, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FATN leads at 18. 7% versus -1. 3% for DDOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DDOG leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is FATN or DDOG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) trades at 20. 8x forward P/E versus 95. 6x for Datadog, Inc. — 74. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FATN or DDOG?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is FATN or DDOG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Datadog, Inc.

(DDOG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+517. 0% 10Y return). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FATN and DDOG?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.