Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FBLG vs MESO vs NKTR vs MDXG vs RGEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
FBLG vs MESO vs NKTR vs MDXG vs RGEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $3M | $1.91B | $1.69B | $548M | $7.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $17M | $55M | $389M | $763M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-102M | $-164M | $31M | $51M |
| Gross Margin | — | -208.5% | 99.6% | 81.0% | 51.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -6.4% | -237.9% | 10.2% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 295.2x | 64.3x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $128M | $149M | $23M | $690M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $161M | $15M | $166M | $566M |
FBLG vs MESO vs NKTR vs MDXG vs RGEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FibroBiologics, Inc… (FBLG) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Mesoblast Limited (MESO) | 100 | 840.9 | +740.9% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 1025.5 | +925.5% |
| MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) | 100 | 47.7 | -52.3% |
| Repligen Corporation (RGEN) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBLG vs MESO vs NKTR vs MDXG vs RGEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBLG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- beta 0.71
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 3.61x
- Beta 0.71 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage
MESO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 191.4%, EPS growth 5.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.0%
- 191.4% revenue growth vs FBLG's -68.2%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs FBLG's -93.1%
MDXG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 4.32x
- 7.9% margin vs MESO's -5.9%
- 9.7% ROA vs FBLG's -170.7%, ROIC 42.3% vs -8.4%
RGEN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 369.1% 10Y total return vs MESO's -2.1%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 191.4% revenue growth vs FBLG's -68.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.9% margin vs MESO's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs FBLG's -93.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs FBLG's -170.7%, ROIC 42.3% vs -8.4% |
FBLG vs MESO vs NKTR vs MDXG vs RGEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FBLG vs MESO vs NKTR vs MDXG vs RGEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MDXG leads in 3 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • FBLG leads 0 • MESO leads 0 • RGEN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDXG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RGEN and FBLG operate at a comparable scale, with $763M and $0 in trailing revenue. MDXG is the more profitable business, keeping 7.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MESO's -5.9%. On growth, MESO holds the edge at +4.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $17M | $55M | $389M | $763M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | -$106M | -$130M | $53M | $155M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$102M | -$164M | $31M | $51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$49M | -$209M | $66M | $104M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -2.1% | +99.6% | +81.0% | +51.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -6.4% | -2.4% | +10.2% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -5.9% | -3.0% | +7.9% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.8% | -3.8% | +17.0% | +13.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.6% | -25.3% | -33.1% | +14.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.0% | +16.0% | -4.5% | -2.4% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MDXG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, MDXG trades at a 92% valuation discount to RGEN's 147.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MDXG's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RGEN's 52.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $1.9B | $1.7B | $548M | $7.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $115,005 | $1.9B | $1.8B | $405M | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.15x | -17.62x | -8.57x | 11.53x | 147.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 295.20x | 64.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 5.14x | 52.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 111.04x | 30.64x | 1.31x | 9.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 2.99x | 15.66x | 2.15x | 3.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 7.51x | 75.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MDXG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MDXG delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-8 for FBLG. MDXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RGEN scores 7/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.9% | -17.1% | -4.0% | +12.9% | +2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -170.7% | -13.0% | -62.8% | +9.7% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.4% | -8.5% | -57.2% | +42.3% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | -9.8% | -55.7% | +25.7% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 0.21x | 1.66x | 0.09x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$33M | $134M | -$144M | $124M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $161M | $15M | $166M | $566M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $128M | $149M | $23M | $690M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -90.40x | -5.84x | -4.74x | 25.32x | 2.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MESO five years ago would be worth $10,602 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21 for FBLG. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs FBLG's -93.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs FBLG's -87.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -74.2% | -18.5% | +92.0% | -43.1% | -23.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -93.1% | +33.9% | +818.2% | -47.1% | -0.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +117.0% | +621.8% | -36.6% | -19.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +6.0% | -72.3% | -62.9% | -32.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -2.1% | -59.1% | -48.5% | +369.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -87.1% | +29.5% | +93.3% | -14.1% | -6.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FBLG and NKTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FBLG is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NKTR currently trades 76.5% from its 52-week high vs FBLG's 5.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.70x | 1.85x | 1.22x | 1.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.60 | $21.50 | $109.00 | $7.99 | $175.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.35 | $9.88 | $7.99 | $3.02 | $109.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.5% | +68.8% | +76.5% | +46.2% | +71.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.1 | 53.7 | 53.4 | 49.3 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 960K | 256K | 991K | 1.4M | 905K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FBLG as "Buy", MESO as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", MDXG as "Buy", RGEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14416.1% upside for FBLG (target: $180) vs -22.3% for MESO (target: $12).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $180.00 | $11.50 | $132.83 | $10.00 | $168.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 11 | 33 | 15 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
MDXG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
FBLG vs MESO vs NKTR vs MDXG vs RGEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBLG or MESO or NKTR or MDXG or RGEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mesoblast Limited (MESO) is the stronger pick with 191.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (295. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FibroBiologics, Inc. Common Stock (FBLG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBLG or MESO or NKTR or MDXG or RGEN?
On trailing P/E, MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Repligen Corporation at 147. 0x. On forward P/E, Repligen Corporation is actually cheaper at 64. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBLG or MESO or NKTR or MDXG or RGEN?
Over the past 5 years, Mesoblast Limited (MESO) delivered a total return of +6.
0%, compared to -99. 8% for FibroBiologics, Inc. Common Stock (FBLG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RGEN returned +369. 1% versus FBLG's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBLG or MESO or NKTR or MDXG or RGEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FibroBiologics, Inc.
Common Stock (FBLG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 160% more volatile than FBLG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBLG or MESO or NKTR or MDXG or RGEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mesoblast Limited (MESO) is pulling ahead at 191.
4% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Repligen Corporation grew EPS 287. 0% year-over-year, compared to -23. 5% for FibroBiologics, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, MESO leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBLG or MESO or NKTR or MDXG or RGEN?
MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 6% net margin versus -593. 9% for Mesoblast Limited — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDXG leads at 15. 3% versus -363. 1% for MESO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBLG or MESO or NKTR or MDXG or RGEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Repligen Corporation (RGEN) trades at 64.
3x forward P/E versus 295. 2x for MiMedx Group, Inc. — 230. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBLG: 14416. 1% to $180. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBLG or MESO or NKTR or MDXG or RGEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FBLG or MESO or NKTR or MDXG or RGEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FibroBiologics, Inc.
Common Stock (FBLG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71)). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBLG: -99. 8%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBLG and MESO and NKTR and MDXG and RGEN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MESO is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; RGEN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.