Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FCCO vs BFST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FCCO vs BFST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $247M | $956M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $111M | $512M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $88M |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | 22.7% | 22.2% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 9.8x |
| Total Debt | $125M | $551M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $411M |
FCCO vs BFST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Community Cor… (FCCO) | 100 | 212.7 | +112.7% |
| Business First Banc… (BFST) | 100 | 190.5 | +90.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCCO vs BFST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCCO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth 36.5%
- 171.1% 10Y total return vs BFST's 31.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 74.3%, current ratio 0.28x
BFST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 1.9%
- NIM 3.3% vs FCCO's 3.0%
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 11.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.7% NII/revenue growth vs BFST's 11.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 11.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FCCO's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs BFST's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs FCCO's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.5% vs BFST's +23.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FCCO's 0.5% |
FCCO vs BFST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCCO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BFST is the larger business by revenue, generating $512M annually — 4.6x FCCO's $111M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.3% (FCCO) to 17.2% (BFST).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $111M | $512M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $119M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.1% | +60.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +22.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +17.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +17.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.7% | +39.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BFST leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, BFST trades at a 19% valuation discount to FCCO's 13.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BFST offers better value at 0.94x vs FCCO's 1.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $247M | $956M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $348M | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.04x | 10.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.99x | 9.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.02x | 0.94x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.25x | 9.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.22x | 1.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.04x | 10.38x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCCO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FCCO delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $10 for BFST. BFST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FCCO's 0.74x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +10.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $101M | $140M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $411M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $125M | $551M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | 0.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FCCO and BFST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FCCO five years ago would be worth $17,725 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,865 for BFST. Over the past 12 months, FCCO leads with a +41.5% total return vs BFST's +23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFST at 25.4% vs FCCO's 23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.3% | +14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.5% | +23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.9% | +97.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.2% | +38.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.1% | +31.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.2% | +25.4% |
Risk & Volatility
FCCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFST's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.45 | $30.32 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.80 | $22.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 87K | 175K |
Analyst Outlook
BFST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FCCO as "Buy" and BFST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.6% upside for BFST (target: $32) vs -6.9% for FCCO (target: $30). For income investors, BFST offers the higher dividend yield at 1.94% vs FCCO's 1.89%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $32.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $0.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
FCCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BFST leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FCCO vs BFST: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCCO or BFST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Community Corporation (FCCO) is the stronger pick with 12.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 8% for Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST). Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Community Corporation (FCCO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FCCO or BFST?
On trailing P/E, Business First Bancshares, Inc.
(BFST) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus First Community Corporation at 13. 0x. On forward P/E, Business First Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Community Corporation wins at 0. 86x versus Business First Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FCCO or BFST?
Over the past 5 years, First Community Corporation (FCCO) delivered a total return of +77.
2%, compared to +38. 7% for Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCCO returned +171. 1% versus BFST's +31. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FCCO or BFST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Community Corporation (FCCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
61β versus Business First Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 79β — meaning BFST is approximately 30% more volatile than FCCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 74% for First Community Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FCCO or BFST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Community Corporation (FCCO) is pulling ahead at 12.
7% versus 11. 8% for Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Community Corporation grew EPS 36. 5% year-over-year, compared to 23. 0% for Business First Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FCCO or BFST?
First Community Corporation (FCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
3% net margin versus 17. 2% for Business First Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCCO leads at 22. 7% versus 22. 2% for BFST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCCO leads at 68. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FCCO or BFST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Community Corporation (FCCO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 86x versus Business First Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 0x for First Community Corporation — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BFST: 10. 6% to $32. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — FCCO or BFST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 1. 9% for First Community Corporation (FCCO).
09Is FCCO or BFST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Community Corporation (FCCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
61), 1. 9% yield, +171. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCCO: +171. 1%, BFST: +31. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FCCO and BFST?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.