Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FCCO vs CHMG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FCCO vs CHMG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $247M | $349M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $111M | $140M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 64.2% |
| Operating Margin | 22.7% | 14.2% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $125M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $23M |
FCCO vs CHMG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Community Cor… (FCCO) | 100 | 212.7 | +112.7% |
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 265.6 | +165.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCCO vs CHMG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth 36.5%
- Beta 0.61, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.28x
CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 175.6% 10Y total return vs FCCO's 171.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 0.13x
- NIM 3.2% vs FCCO's 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.7% NII/revenue growth vs CHMG's -6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 11.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs FCCO's 0.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CHMG's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.6% vs FCCO's +41.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CHMG's 0.5% |
FCCO vs CHMG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FCCO vs CHMG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCCO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHMG and FCCO operate at a comparable scale, with $140M and $111M in trailing revenue. FCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $111M | $140M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.1% | +64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +14.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +31.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.7% | +29.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FCCO and CHMG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, FCCO trades at a 44% valuation discount to CHMG's 23.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FCCO's 13.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHMG's 14.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $247M | $349M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $348M | $331M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.04x | 23.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.99x | 10.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.02x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.25x | 14.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.22x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 1.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.04x | 7.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FCCO delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $6 for CHMG. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FCCO's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCCO scores 7/9 vs CHMG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $101M | -$18M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $125M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | 0.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHMG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHMG five years ago would be worth $18,650 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,725 for FCCO. Over the past 12 months, CHMG leads with a +52.6% total return vs FCCO's +41.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHMG at 24.6% vs FCCO's 23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.3% | +33.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.5% | +52.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.9% | +93.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.2% | +86.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.1% | +175.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.2% | +24.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FCCO and CHMG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHMG is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FCCO's 0.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.45 | $73.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.80 | $43.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 68.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 87K | 32K |
Analyst Outlook
FCCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FCCO as "Buy" and CHMG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -6.9% upside for FCCO (target: $30) vs -31.0% for CHMG (target: $50). For income investors, FCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.89% vs CHMG's 1.81%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $50.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $1.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
FCCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CHMG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FCCO vs CHMG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCCO or CHMG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Community Corporation (FCCO) is the stronger pick with 12.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). First Community Corporation (FCCO) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Community Corporation (FCCO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FCCO or CHMG?
On trailing P/E, First Community Corporation (FCCO) is the cheapest at 13.
0x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 23. 2x. On forward P/E, Chemung Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FCCO or CHMG?
Over the past 5 years, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) delivered a total return of +86.
5%, compared to +77. 2% for First Community Corporation (FCCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMG returned +175. 6% versus FCCO's +171. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FCCO or CHMG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus First Community Corporation's 0. 61β — meaning FCCO is approximately 10% more volatile than CHMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 74% for First Community Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FCCO or CHMG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Community Corporation (FCCO) is pulling ahead at 12.
7% versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Community Corporation grew EPS 36. 5% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FCCO or CHMG?
First Community Corporation (FCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
3% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCCO leads at 22. 7% versus 14. 2% for CHMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCCO leads at 68. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FCCO or CHMG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) trades at 10.
1x forward P/E versus 11. 0x for First Community Corporation — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCCO: -6. 9% to $30. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FCCO or CHMG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Community Corporation (FCCO) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 1. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG).
09Is FCCO or CHMG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 1. 8% yield, +175. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHMG: +175. 6%, FCCO: +171. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FCCO and CHMG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FCCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.