Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FCPT vs PINE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FCPT
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.79B
5Y Perf.+17.5%
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$279M
5Y Perf.+57.5%

FCPT vs PINE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FCPT logoFCPT
PINE logoPINE
IndustryREIT - RetailREIT - Retail
Market Cap$2.79B$279M
Revenue (TTM)$301M$65M
Net Income (TTM)$117M$-415K
Gross Margin98.0%-4.1%
Operating Margin56.0%28.0%
Forward P/E21.8x58.8x
Total Debt$1.21B$394M
Cash & Equiv.$12M$5M

FCPT vs PINELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FCPT
PINE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Four Corners Proper… (FCPT)100117.5+17.5%
Alpine Income Prope… (PINE)100157.5+57.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FCPT vs PINE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FCPT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FCPT
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

FCPT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.5%
  • 98.9% 10Y total return vs PINE's 37.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 74.2%, current ratio 0.30x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

PINE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth -257.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.2%
  • 15.9% FFO/revenue growth vs FCPT's 9.7%
  • +35.5% vs FCPT's -3.7%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPINE logoPINE15.9% FFO/revenue growth vs FCPT's 9.7%
ValueFCPT logoFCPTLower P/E (21.8x vs 58.8x)
Quality / MarginsFCPT logoFCPT38.7% margin vs PINE's -0.6%
Stability / SafetyFCPT logoFCPTBeta 0.14 vs PINE's 0.33, lower leverage
DividendsFCPT logoFCPT5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs PINE's 0.2%
Momentum (1Y)PINE logoPINE+35.5% vs FCPT's -3.7%
Efficiency (ROA)FCPT logoFCPT4.1% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 4.5% vs 2.2%

FCPT vs PINE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FCPTFour Corners Property Trust, Inc.
FY 2025
Real Estate Operations
89.2%$262M
Restaurant Operations
10.7%$31M
Other
0.1%$400,000
PINEAlpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
FY 2025
Income Properties
100.0%$49M

FCPT vs PINE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFCPTLAGGINGPINE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FCPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FCPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $301M annually — 4.6x PINE's $65M. FCPT is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -0.6%. On growth, PINE holds the edge at +29.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFCPT logoFCPTFour Corners Prop…PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$301M$65M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$231M$45M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$117M-$415,000
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$188M-$46M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+98.0%-4.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+56.0%+28.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+38.7%-0.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+62.5%-71.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.4%+29.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.7%+185.7%
FCPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PINE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, PINE's 14.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FCPT's 17.8x.

MetricFCPT logoFCPTFour Corners Prop…PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…
Market CapShares × price$2.8B$279M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.0B$669M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS23.31x-88.55x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.21.76x58.83x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate117.93x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.78x14.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.48x4.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.60x1.01x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.50x
PINE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FCPT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

FCPT delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-0 for PINE. FCPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.74x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PINE's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCPT scores 7/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFCPT logoFCPTFour Corners Prop…PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%-0.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.1%-0.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.5%+2.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.0%+2.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–972
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.74x1.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.2B$390M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$12M$5M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.2B$394M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.17x0.82x
FCPT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PINE five years ago would be worth $14,113 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,624 for FCPT. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +35.5% total return vs FCPT's -3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINE at 13.3% vs FCPT's 4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFCPT logoFCPTFour Corners Prop…PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.9%+17.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-3.7%+35.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+13.8%+45.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+16.2%+41.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+98.9%+37.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+4.4%+13.3%
PINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FCPT and PINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FCPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PINE's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PINE currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs FCPT's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFCPT logoFCPTFour Corners Prop…PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.14x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$28.14$20.80
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$22.78$13.10
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.3%+93.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.453.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded666K175K
Evenly matched — FCPT and PINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FCPT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates FCPT as "Hold" and PINE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for PINE (target: $21) vs 6.3% for FCPT (target: $27). For income investors, FCPT offers the higher dividend yield at 5.50% vs PINE's 0.18%.

MetricFCPT logoFCPTFour Corners Prop…PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.00$20.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts1512
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.5%+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises80
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.40$0.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.2%
FCPT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FCPT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PINE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallFour Corners Property Trust… (FCPT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FCPT vs PINE: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FCPT or PINE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.

(PINE) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) offers the better valuation at 23. 3x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FCPT or PINE?

On forward P/E, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 21. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FCPT or PINE?

Over the past 5 years, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.

(PINE) delivered a total return of +41. 1%, compared to +16. 2% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCPT returned +98. 9% versus PINE's +37. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FCPT or PINE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.

(FCPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning PINE is approximately 134% more volatile than FCPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 74% versus 131% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FCPT or PINE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.

(PINE) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 9. 7% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. grew EPS 1. 9% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PINE leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FCPT or PINE?

Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.

(FCPT) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 2% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCPT leads at 55. 7% versus 30. 5% for PINE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCPT leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FCPT or PINE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.

(FCPT) trades at 21. 8x forward P/E versus 58. 8x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 37. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PINE: 6. 5% to $20. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FCPT or PINE?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 0. 2% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).

09

Is FCPT or PINE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.

(FCPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 5. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCPT: +98. 9%, PINE: +37. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FCPT and PINE?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock. FCPT pays a dividend while PINE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FCPT

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PINE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FCPT and PINE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FCPT: 9.4% · PINE: 29.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.