Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FDSB vs DCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FDSB vs DCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $84M | $1.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $730M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $111M |
| Gross Margin | 58.5% | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.4% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $371M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $2.35B |
FDSB vs DCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fifth District Savi… (FDSB) | 100 | 144.7 | +44.7% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 143.3 | +43.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDSB vs DCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDSB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.19
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.19, current ratio 0.10x
DCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- 68.6% 10Y total return vs FDSB's 48.4%
- NIM 2.7% vs FDSB's 1.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs FDSB's 10.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FDSB's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs DCOM's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.6% vs FDSB's +22.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FDSB's 0.7% |
FDSB vs DCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FDSB vs DCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $730M annually — 37.9x FDSB's $19M. DCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FDSB's -5.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $730M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $161M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $111M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $648,000 | $182M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.5% | +56.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | +25.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +144.5% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FDSB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $46M | -$341M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -72.43x | 15.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.47x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -2.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.36x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DCOM leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DCOM delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $3 for FDSB. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs FDSB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.8% | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | -$2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $371M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.40x | 0.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FDSB five years ago would be worth $14,839 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,266 for DCOM. Over the past 12 months, DCOM leads with a +46.6% total return vs FDSB's +22.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DCOM at 31.8% vs FDSB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.7% | +46.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +129.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +22.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +68.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.1% | +31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FDSB and DCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FDSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DCOM's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.64 | $37.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.70 | $24.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 271K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
DCOM is the only dividend payer here at 2.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FDSB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FDSB vs DCOM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDSB or DCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 9% for Fifth District Savings Bank (FDSB). Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FDSB or DCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Fifth District Savings Bank (FDSB) delivered a total return of +48.
4%, compared to +22. 7% for Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DCOM returned +68. 6% versus FDSB's +48. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FDSB or DCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fifth District Savings Bank (FDSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning DCOM is approximately 443% more volatile than FDSB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FDSB or DCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 10. 9% for Fifth District Savings Bank (FDSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to -250. 0% for Fifth District Savings Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FDSB or DCOM?
Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -5. 6% for Fifth District Savings Bank — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DCOM leads at 21. 5% versus -7. 4% for FDSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FDSB leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FDSB or DCOM?
In this comparison, DCOM (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. FDSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is FDSB or DCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fifth District Savings Bank (FDSB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FDSB: +48. 4%, DCOM: +68. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FDSB and DCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDSB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock. DCOM pays a dividend while FDSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.