FE
FirstEnergy Corp.
Regulated Electric
Market Cap$26.33B
5Y Perf.+7.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FE vs EIX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
EIX
Edison International
Regulated Electric
Market Cap$26.47B
5Y Perf.+18.4%
FE vs EIX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FE | EIX |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $26.33B | $26.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.53B | $19.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.06B | $3.70B |
| Gross Margin | 53.8% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | 21.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.7x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $27.07B | $42.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $99M | $158M |
FE vs EIX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FE
EIX
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FirstEnergy Corp. (FE) | 100 | 107.7 | +7.7% |
| Edison International (EIX) | 100 | 118.4 | +18.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FE vs EIX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EIX leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. FirstEnergy Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FE
FirstEnergy Corp.
The Growth Play
FE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 3.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.6%
- 83.7% 10Y total return vs EIX's 33.3%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.02, current ratio 0.57x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
EIX
Edison International
The Income Pick
EIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 4.8%
- Beta 0.42, yield 4.8%, current ratio 0.73x
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 16.7x)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FE | 12.0% revenue growth vs EIX's 9.8% |
| Value | EIX | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 16.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | EIX | 18.9% margin vs FE's 6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | FE | Lower D/E ratio (194.4% vs 221.1%) |
| Dividends | EIX | 4.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FE's 3.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | EIX | +31.7% vs FE's +9.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EIX | 4.0% ROA vs FE's 1.9%, ROIC 9.1% vs 5.4% |
FE vs EIX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2011
FE vs EIX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEIXLAGGINGFE
FEFirstEnergy Corp.
2leads
EIXEdison International
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FE4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
EIX5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EIX6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FE4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
EIX2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EIX and FE operate at a comparable scale, with $19.6B and $15.5B in trailing revenue. EIX is the more profitable business, keeping 18.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FE's 6.9%. On growth, FE holds the edge at +11.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FEFirstEnergy Corp. | EIXEdison Internatio… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.5B | $19.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.5B | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $3.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | -$643M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.8% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +21.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | -3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.6% | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.9% | -63.2% |
FE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
EIX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, EIX trades at a 77% valuation discount to FE's 25.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EIX's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FE's 12.1x.
| Metric | FEFirstEnergy Corp. | EIXEdison Internatio… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26.3B | $26.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $53.3B | $68.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.87x | 5.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.67x | 11.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.15x | 6.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.75x | 1.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.89x | 1.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
EIX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EIX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EIX delivers a 19.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $8 for FE. FE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.94x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EIX's 2.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EIX scores 6/9 vs FE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FEFirstEnergy Corp. | EIXEdison Internatio… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.6% | +19.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.94x | 2.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27.0B | $42.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $99M | $158M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27.1B | $42.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.49x | 3.56x |
EIX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FE five years ago would be worth $14,358 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,269 for EIX. Over the past 12 months, EIX leads with a +31.7% total return vs FE's +9.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FE at 8.7% vs EIX's 2.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FEFirstEnergy Corp. | EIXEdison Internatio… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.6% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.6% | +31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.5% | +6.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.6% | +42.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.7% | +33.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | +2.3% |
FE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FE and EIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FE is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EIX's 0.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EIX currently trades 90.3% from its 52-week high vs FE's 87.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FEFirstEnergy Corp. | EIXEdison Internatio… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.34 | $76.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.28 | $47.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.0% | +90.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.6 | 42.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 2.9M |
Evenly matched — FE and EIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
EIX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FE as "Hold" and EIX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.0% upside for FE (target: $51) vs 8.5% for EIX (target: $75). For income investors, EIX offers the higher dividend yield at 4.81% vs FE's 3.86%.
| Metric | FEFirstEnergy Corp. | EIXEdison Internatio… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.43 | $74.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +4.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.76 | $3.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.4% |
EIX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
EIX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallEdison International (EIX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FE vs EIX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FE or EIX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FirstEnergy Corp.
(FE) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 8% for Edison International (EIX). Edison International (EIX) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Edison International (EIX) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FE or EIX?
On trailing P/E, Edison International (EIX) is the cheapest at 6.
0x versus FirstEnergy Corp. at 25. 9x. On forward P/E, Edison International is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FE or EIX?
Over the past 5 years, FirstEnergy Corp.
(FE) delivered a total return of +43. 6%, compared to +42. 7% for Edison International (EIX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FE returned +83. 7% versus EIX's +33. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FE or EIX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FirstEnergy Corp.
(FE) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus Edison International's 0. 42β — meaning EIX is approximately -2575% more volatile than FE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FirstEnergy Corp. (FE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 194% versus 2% for Edison International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FE or EIX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FirstEnergy Corp.
(FE) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus 9. 8% for Edison International (EIX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Edison International grew EPS 248. 9% year-over-year, compared to 3. 5% for FirstEnergy Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FE leads at 6. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FE or EIX?
Edison International (EIX) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
6% net margin versus 6. 8% for FirstEnergy Corp. — meaning it keeps 23. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EIX leads at 36. 7% versus 18. 8% for FE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EIX leads at 57. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FE or EIX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Edison International (EIX) trades at 11.
2x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for FirstEnergy Corp. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FE: 13. 0% to $51. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — FE or EIX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Edison International (EIX) offers the highest yield at 4. 8%, versus 3. 9% for FirstEnergy Corp. (FE).
09Is FE or EIX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FirstEnergy Corp.
(FE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02), 3. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FE: +83. 7%, EIX: +33. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FE and EIX?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EIX is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FE: 11.6% · EIX: 7.7%)Net Margin>
%
(FE: 6.9% · EIX: 18.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(FE: 25.9x · EIX: 6.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.