FEAM
5E Advanced Materials Inc.
Construction Materials
Market Cap$39M
5Y Perf.-99.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FEAM vs ALB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$23.37B
5Y Perf.-10.3%
FEAM vs ALB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FEAM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $39M | $23.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $5.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $-233M |
| Gross Margin | -40.2% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | -5.8% | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.4x |
| Total Debt | $215K | $3.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $1.62B |
FEAM vs ALB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FEAM
ALB
| Stock | Mar 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5E Advanced Materia… (FEAM) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Albemarle Corporati… (ALB) | 100 | 89.7 | -10.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FEAM vs ALB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ALB leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. 5E Advanced Materials Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FEAM
5E Advanced Materials Inc.
The Income Pick
FEAM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.45
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 0.72x
- Beta 1.45, current ratio 0.72x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
The Growth Play
ALB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -4.4%, EPS growth 48.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- 217.0% 10Y total return vs FEAM's -99.8%
- -4.2% margin vs FEAM's -365.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FEAM | 90.5% revenue growth vs ALB's -4.4% |
| Quality / Margins | ALB | -4.2% margin vs FEAM's -365.0% |
| Stability / Safety | FEAM | Beta 1.45 vs ALB's 1.60, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ALB | 0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ALB | +256.7% vs FEAM's -67.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ALB | -1.4% ROA vs FEAM's -44.4%, ROIC 0.6% vs -50.2% |
FEAM vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FEAM vs ALB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLALBLAGGINGFEAM
FEAM5E Advanced Materials…
0leads
ALBAlbemarle Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FEAMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ALB4/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ALB6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ALB6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALB leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALB is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 770.8x FEAM's $7M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -4.2% (ALB) to -3.7% (FEAM).
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | ALBAlbemarle Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | $802M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | -$233M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | $577M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +32.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.9% | — |
ALB leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FEAM and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | ALBAlbemarle Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $39M | $23.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35M | $25.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.42x | -34.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 33.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.21x | 2.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 33.76x |
Evenly matched — FEAM and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALB delivers a -2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-50 for FEAM. FEAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALB's 0.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALB scores 6/9 vs FEAM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | ALBAlbemarle Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.4% | -2.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.4% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.2% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.7% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $215,000 | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.75x | 1.59x |
ALB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALB five years ago would be worth $12,680 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22 for FEAM. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +256.7% total return vs FEAM's -67.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALB at 3.0% vs FEAM's -75.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | ALBAlbemarle Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.9% | +38.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.4% | +256.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +9.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +26.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +217.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.1% | +3.0% |
ALB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FEAM and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FEAM is the less volatile stock with a 1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALB's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALB currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs FEAM's 22.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | ALBAlbemarle Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.50 | $221.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.18 | $53.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.0% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 53.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 233K | 2.0M |
Evenly matched — FEAM and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
ALB is the only dividend payer here at 0.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | ALBAlbemarle Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $190.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ALB leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallAlbemarle Corporation (ALB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FEAM vs ALB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FEAM or ALB a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Albemarle Corporation (ALB) a "Hold" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FEAM or ALB?
Over the past 5 years, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) delivered a total return of +26.
8%, compared to -99. 8% for 5E Advanced Materials Inc. (FEAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALB returned +217. 0% versus FEAM's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FEAM or ALB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 5E Advanced Materials Inc.
(FEAM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 45β versus Albemarle Corporation's 1. 60β — meaning ALB is approximately 10% more volatile than FEAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, 5E Advanced Materials Inc. (FEAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 34% for Albemarle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FEAM or ALB?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Albemarle Corporation grew EPS 48.
7% year-over-year, compared to -234. 7% for 5E Advanced Materials Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FEAM or ALB?
Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the more profitable company, earning -9.
9% net margin versus -365. 0% for 5E Advanced Materials Inc. — meaning it keeps -9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALB leads at 1. 8% versus -581. 1% for FEAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALB leads at 13. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FEAM or ALB?
In this comparison, ALB (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FEAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is FEAM or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
8% yield, +217. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALB: +217. 0%, FEAM: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FEAM and ALB?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ALB pays a dividend while FEAM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.