FEAM
5E Advanced Materials Inc.
Construction Materials
Market Cap$39M
5Y Perf.-99.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FEAM vs LAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$1.37B
5Y Perf.-76.2%
FEAM vs LAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FEAM | LAC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $39M | $1.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $-241M |
| Gross Margin | -40.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.8% | — |
| Total Debt | $215K | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $594M |
FEAM vs LAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FEAM
LAC
| Stock | Mar 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5E Advanced Materia… (FEAM) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Lithium Americas Co… (LAC) | 100 | 23.8 | -76.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FEAM vs LAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LAC leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. 5E Advanced Materials Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FEAM
5E Advanced Materials Inc.
The Growth Play
FEAM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth -234.7%
- 90.5% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
Best for: growth exposure
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
The Income Pick
LAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.42
- 234.9% 10Y total return vs FEAM's -99.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 10.33x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FEAM | 90.5% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0% |
| Quality / Margins | LAC | 1.4% margin vs FEAM's -365.0% |
| Stability / Safety | LAC | Beta 1.42 vs FEAM's 1.45 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LAC | +84.4% vs FEAM's -67.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LAC | -16.6% ROA vs FEAM's -44.4%, ROIC -7.1% vs -50.2% |
FEAM vs LAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLACLAGGINGFEAM
FEAM5E Advanced Materials…
1leads
LACLithium Americas Corp.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FEAMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FEAM1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LAC5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LAC6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
LAC2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FEAM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FEAM and LAC operate at a comparable scale, with $7M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | LACLithium Americas … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | -$241M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | -$648M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.9% | -21.4% |
FEAM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FEAM and LAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | LACLithium Americas … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $39M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35M | $801M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.42x | -26.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.21x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — FEAM and LAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAC leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAC delivers a -26.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-27 in annual profit, vs $-50 for FEAM. FEAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAC's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FEAM scores 5/9 vs LAC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | LACLithium Americas … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.4% | -26.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.4% | -16.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.2% | -7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.7% | -3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$571M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $594M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $215,000 | $23M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.75x | — |
LAC leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LAC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LAC five years ago would be worth $6,869 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22 for FEAM. Over the past 12 months, LAC leads with a +84.4% total return vs FEAM's -67.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LAC at -23.7% vs FEAM's -75.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | LACLithium Americas … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.9% | +18.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.4% | +84.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -55.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -31.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +234.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.1% | -23.7% |
LAC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LAC is the less volatile stock with a 1.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FEAM's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LAC currently trades 53.8% from its 52-week high vs FEAM's 22.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | LACLithium Americas … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.50 | $10.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.18 | $2.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.0% | +53.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 233K | 9.0M |
LAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | LACLithium Americas … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
LAC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FEAM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
Best OverallLithium Americas Corp. (LAC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FEAM vs LAC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FEAM or LAC a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Lithium Americas Corp.
(LAC) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FEAM or LAC?
Over the past 5 years, Lithium Americas Corp.
(LAC) delivered a total return of -31. 3%, compared to -99. 8% for 5E Advanced Materials Inc. (FEAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LAC returned +234. 9% versus FEAM's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FEAM or LAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lithium Americas Corp.
(LAC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 42β versus 5E Advanced Materials Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning FEAM is approximately 2% more volatile than LAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, 5E Advanced Materials Inc. (FEAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Lithium Americas Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FEAM or LAC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 5E Advanced Materials Inc.
grew EPS -234. 7% year-over-year, compared to -757. 1% for Lithium Americas Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FEAM or LAC?
Lithium Americas Corp.
(LAC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -365. 0% for 5E Advanced Materials Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAC leads at 0. 0% versus -581. 1% for FEAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAC leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FEAM or LAC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FEAM or LAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lithium Americas Corp.
(LAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+234. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LAC: +234. 9%, FEAM: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FEAM and LAC?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.