FEAM
5E Advanced Materials Inc.
Construction Materials
Market Cap$39M
5Y Perf.-99.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FEAM vs SLI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SLI
Standard Lithium Ltd.
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$932M
5Y Perf.-55.6%
FEAM vs SLI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FEAM | SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $39M | $932M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $166M |
| Gross Margin | -40.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.8% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $215K | $989K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $39M |
FEAM vs SLI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FEAM
SLI
| Stock | Mar 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5E Advanced Materia… (FEAM) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Standard Lithium Lt… (SLI) | 100 | 44.4 | -55.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FEAM vs SLI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SLI leads in 3 of 5 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. 5E Advanced Materials Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FEAM
5E Advanced Materials Inc.
The Income Pick
FEAM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.45
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 0.72x
- Beta 1.45, current ratio 0.72x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
SLI
Standard Lithium Ltd.
The Growth Play
SLI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 428.0%
- 220.5% 10Y total return vs FEAM's -99.8%
- 401.6% revenue growth vs FEAM's 90.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SLI | 401.6% revenue growth vs FEAM's 90.5% |
| Stability / Safety | FEAM | Beta 1.45 vs SLI's 1.55 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SLI | +175.4% vs FEAM's -67.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SLI | 60.4% ROA vs FEAM's -44.4%, ROIC -16.9% vs -50.2% |
FEAM vs SLI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2015
FEAM vs SLI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFEAMLAGGINGSLI
SLIStandard Lithium Ltd.
2leads
FEAM5E Advanced Materials…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SLIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FEAM1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FEAM2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SLI7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SLI6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FEAM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FEAM and SLI operate at a comparable scale, with $7M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | SLIStandard Lithium … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | $166M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | -$23M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.9% | -103.3% |
FEAM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
FEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | SLIStandard Lithium … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $39M | $932M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35M | $904M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.42x | 6.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.21x | 2.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
FEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLI delivers a 68.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $68 in annual profit, vs $-50 for FEAM. SLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FEAM's 0.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FEAM scores 5/9 vs SLI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | SLIStandard Lithium … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.4% | +68.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.4% | +60.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.2% | -16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.7% | -21.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$52M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $215,000 | $989,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.75x | 2702.72x |
SLI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SLI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLI five years ago would be worth $11,672 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22 for FEAM. Over the past 12 months, SLI leads with a +175.4% total return vs FEAM's -67.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLI at 5.4% vs FEAM's -75.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | SLIStandard Lithium … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.9% | -18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.4% | +175.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +17.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +16.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +220.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.1% | +5.4% |
SLI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FEAM and SLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FEAM is the less volatile stock with a 1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLI's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLI currently trades 61.1% from its 52-week high vs FEAM's 22.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | SLIStandard Lithium … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.50 | $6.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.18 | $1.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.0% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 233K | 1.8M |
Evenly matched — FEAM and SLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FEAM5E Advanced Mater… | SLIStandard Lithium … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FEAM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SLI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best Overall5E Advanced Materials Inc. (FEAM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FEAM vs SLI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FEAM or SLI a better buy right now?
Standard Lithium Ltd.
(SLI) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Standard Lithium Ltd. (SLI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FEAM or SLI?
Over the past 5 years, Standard Lithium Ltd.
(SLI) delivered a total return of +16. 7%, compared to -99. 8% for 5E Advanced Materials Inc. (FEAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLI returned +220. 5% versus FEAM's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FEAM or SLI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 5E Advanced Materials Inc.
(FEAM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 45β versus Standard Lithium Ltd. 's 1. 55β — meaning SLI is approximately 7% more volatile than FEAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Standard Lithium Ltd. (SLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 0% for 5E Advanced Materials Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FEAM or SLI?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Standard Lithium Ltd.
grew EPS 428. 0% year-over-year, compared to -234. 7% for 5E Advanced Materials Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FEAM or SLI?
Standard Lithium Ltd.
(SLI) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -365. 0% for 5E Advanced Materials Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLI leads at 0. 0% versus -581. 1% for FEAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLI leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FEAM or SLI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FEAM or SLI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Standard Lithium Ltd.
(SLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+220. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLI: +220. 5%, FEAM: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FEAM and SLI?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FEAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.