Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FEMY vs SSKN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
FEMY vs SSKN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $13M | $7M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $31M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 62.0% | 57.8% |
| Operating Margin | -7.7% | -33.3% |
| Total Debt | $5M | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $7M |
FEMY vs SSKN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Femasys Inc. (FEMY) | 100 | 5.5 | -94.5% |
| STRATA Skin Science… (SSKN) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FEMY vs SSKN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FEMY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 40.8%, EPS growth 44.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.9%
- -96.3% 10Y total return vs SSKN's -99.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 80.0%, current ratio 4.53x
SSKN is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- -35.6% margin vs FEMY's -8.1%
- -35.9% ROA vs FEMY's -116.3%, ROIC -38.9% vs -347.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.8% revenue growth vs SSKN's 0.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -35.6% margin vs FEMY's -8.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (80.0% vs 330.6%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -60.6% vs SSKN's -93.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -35.9% ROA vs FEMY's -116.3%, ROIC -38.9% vs -347.4% |
FEMY vs SSKN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FEMY vs SSKN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FEMY and SSKN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SSKN is the larger business by revenue, generating $31M annually — 13.5x FEMY's $2M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -35.6% (SSKN) to -8.1% (FEMY). On growth, FEMY holds the edge at +39.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $31M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | -$5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.0% | +57.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.7% | -33.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | -35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | -11.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.9% | -21.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.9% | -5.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SSKN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $7M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $16M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.96x | -0.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.77x | 0.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.03x | 1.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SSKN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FEMY delivers a -5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SSKN. FEMY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.80x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SSKN's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SSKN scores 4/9 vs FEMY's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.3% | -8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -116.3% | -35.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.5% | -38.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -167.9% | -36.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 3.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.85x | -4.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FEMY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FEMY five years ago would be worth $374 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $109 for SSKN. Over the past 12 months, FEMY leads with a -60.6% total return vs SSKN's -93.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FEMY at -15.7% vs SSKN's -74.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.5% | -86.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -60.6% | -93.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.1% | -98.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | -98.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | -99.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.7% | -74.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FEMY and SSKN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SSKN is the less volatile stock with a -0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FEMY's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FEMY currently trades 38.7% from its 52-week high vs SSKN's 4.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | -0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.16 | $3.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.31 | $0.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.7% | +4.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 41.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 513K | 14K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SSKN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FEMY leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FEMY vs SSKN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FEMY or SSKN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Femasys Inc.
(FEMY) is the stronger pick with 40. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (SSKN). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FEMY or SSKN?
Over the past 5 years, Femasys Inc.
(FEMY) delivered a total return of -96. 3%, compared to -98. 9% for STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (SSKN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FEMY returned -96. 3% versus SSKN's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FEMY or SSKN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
(SSKN) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 24β versus Femasys Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning FEMY is approximately -553% more volatile than SSKN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Femasys Inc. (FEMY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 3% for STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FEMY or SSKN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Femasys Inc.
(FEMY) is pulling ahead at 40. 8% versus 0. 6% for STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (SSKN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Femasys Inc. grew EPS 44. 0% year-over-year, compared to 16. 1% for STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FEMY leads at 23. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FEMY or SSKN?
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
(SSKN) is the more profitable company, earning -30. 1% net margin versus -812. 3% for Femasys Inc. — meaning it keeps -30. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSKN leads at -27. 6% versus -767. 0% for FEMY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FEMY leads at 62. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FEMY or SSKN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FEMY or SSKN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
(SSKN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 24)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSKN: -99. 6%, FEMY: -96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FEMY and SSKN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FEMY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SSKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.