Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FENC vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO vs SUPN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
FENC vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO vs SUPN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $194M | $1690.08T | $5.83B | $1.62B | $2.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $4.18B | $777M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-168M | $153M | $-1.82B | $-29M |
| Gross Margin | 93.1% | — | 65.4% | 34.2% | 89.4% |
| Operating Margin | -12.0% | — | 12.3% | -4.1% | -5.5% |
| Forward P/E | 54.3x | — | 24.5x | 5.5x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $22M | $70M | $3.97B | $41M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $194M | $1.12B | $532M | $128M |
FENC vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO vs SUPN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fennec Pharmaceutic… (FENC) | 100 | 93.6 | -6.4% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 213.9 | +113.9% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 213.6 | +113.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FENC vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO vs SUPN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FENC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 123.7%, EPS growth 97.3%
- 123.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.5% vs PRGO's -52.0%
ALKS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.00, current ratio 3.55x
- 9.8% margin vs PRGO's -43.5%
- 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 9.8%
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 20.8x)
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
SUPN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 223.7% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -12.0%
- Beta 0.80 vs FENC's 1.78
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 123.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs FENC's 1.78 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.5% vs PRGO's -52.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
FENC vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO vs SUPN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FENC vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO vs SUPN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 2 • SUPN leads 1 • FENC leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, FENC holds the edge at +78.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39M | $0 | $1.6B | $4.2B | $777M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$112M | $212M | $58M | $29M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$168M | $153M | -$1.8B | -$29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$151M | $392M | $108M | $82M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.1% | — | +65.4% | +34.2% | +89.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | — | +12.3% | -4.1% | -5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.9% | — | +9.8% | -43.5% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.6% | — | +25.1% | +2.6% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.7% | — | +28.2% | -7.2% | +38.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.1% | +91.5% | -4.1% | -56.4% | +81.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FENC's 55.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $194M | $1690.08T | $5.8B | $1.6B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $187M | $1690.08T | $4.8B | $5.1B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -433.13x | -0.75x | 24.47x | -1.14x | -75.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 54.27x | — | — | 5.53x | 20.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 55.57x | — | 17.01x | 7.43x | 52.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.09x | — | 3.95x | 0.38x | 4.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.65x | 3.25x | 0.55x | 2.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.21x | — | 12.14x | 11.17x | 64.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs SUPN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -130.2% | +8.8% | -50.7% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.0% | -89.0% | +5.4% | -19.8% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | +18.9% | +3.7% | -2.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | -145.7% | +14.2% | +4.3% | -3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x | 0.04x | 1.35x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$172M | -$1.0B | $3.4B | -$87M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $194M | $1.1B | $532M | $128M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $22M | $70M | $4.0B | $41M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.57x | -189.82x | 32.30x | -7.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SUPN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUPN five years ago would be worth $17,557 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,172 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +100.5% total return vs PRGO's -52.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SUPN at 11.9% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.8% | +3.6% | +23.8% | -13.6% | +4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.6% | +100.5% | +15.2% | -52.0% | +63.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.8% | +18.1% | +13.2% | -58.1% | +40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.9% | -68.3% | +61.7% | -60.3% | +75.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.3% | -87.1% | -12.0% | -77.7% | +223.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.5% | +5.7% | +4.2% | -25.2% | +11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKS and SUPN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SUPN is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FENC's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 1.26x | 1.00x | 1.21x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.92 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $28.44 | $59.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.65 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $9.23 | $30.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +75.3% | +95.6% | +41.2% | +86.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 47.4 | 60.5 | 53.1 | 61.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 177K | 252K | 2.2M | 3.3M | 594K |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FENC as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", SUPN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 209.1% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 16.4% for SUPN (target: $60). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $46.33 | $46.00 | $36.20 | $60.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 15 | 28 | 36 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 10 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FENC vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO vs SUPN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FENC or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO or SUPN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(FENC) is the stronger pick with 123. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. (FENC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FENC or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO or SUPN?
On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FENC or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO or SUPN?
Over the past 5 years, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) delivered a total return of +75. 6%, compared to -68. 3% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUPN returned +223. 7% versus DBVT's -87. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FENC or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO or SUPN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. 's 1. 78β — meaning FENC is approximately 122% more volatile than SUPN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FENC or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO or SUPN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(FENC) is pulling ahead at 123. 7% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 97. 3% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKS leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FENC or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO or SUPN?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -5. 1% for SUPN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FENC leads at 93. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FENC or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO or SUPN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
5x forward P/E versus 54. 3x for Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 48. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 209. 1% to $36. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — FENC or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO or SUPN?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FENC, DBVT, ALKS, SUPN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FENC or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO or SUPN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80), +223. 7% 10Y return). Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. (FENC) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUPN: +223. 7%, FENC: -42. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FENC and DBVT and ALKS and PRGO and SUPN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FENC is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO pays a dividend while FENC, DBVT, ALKS, SUPN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.