Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FENG vs MOMO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FENG
Phoenix New Media Limited

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • CN
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-77.4%
MOMO
Hello Group Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$2.16B
5Y Perf.-67.9%

FENG vs MOMO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FENG logoFENG
MOMO logoMOMO
IndustryInternet Content & InformationInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$21M$2.16B
Revenue (TTM)$761M$10.29B
Net Income (TTM)$-49M$800M
Gross Margin45.6%37.7%
Operating Margin-6.9%12.7%
Forward P/E0.2x1.1x
Total Debt$57M$129M
Cash & Equiv.$608M$5.44B

FENG vs MOMOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FENG
MOMO
StockMay 20May 26Return
Phoenix New Media L… (FENG)10022.6-77.4%
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)10032.1-67.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FENG vs MOMO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MOMO leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Phoenix New Media Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FENG
Phoenix New Media Limited
The Income Pick

FENG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.61
  • Rev growth 1.7%, EPS growth 48.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 5.1%, current ratio 2.74x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MOMO
Hello Group Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MOMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • -9.4% 10Y total return vs FENG's -79.6%
  • 7.8% margin vs FENG's -6.4%
  • 4.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFENG logoFENG1.7% revenue growth vs MOMO's -5.9%
ValueFENG logoFENGLower P/E (0.2x vs 1.1x)
Quality / MarginsMOMO logoMOMO7.8% margin vs FENG's -6.4%
Stability / SafetyFENG logoFENGBeta 0.61 vs MOMO's 0.78
DividendsMOMO logoMOMO4.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MOMO logoMOMO+16.2% vs FENG's -18.2%
Efficiency (ROA)MOMO logoMOMO5.3% ROA vs FENG's -3.0%, ROIC 10.9% vs -7.7%

FENG vs MOMO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FENGPhoenix New Media Limited
FY 2024
Paid Services Revenues From Paid Contents
63.7%$47M
Paid Services Revenues From E Commerce And Others
36.3%$27M
MOMOHello Group Inc.
FY 2024
Live Video Service
49.5%$4.8B
Value-added Services
49.4%$4.8B
Mobile Marketing
1.1%$105M
Other Services
0.0%$3M
Mobile Games
0.0%$432,000

FENG vs MOMO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMOMOLAGGINGFENG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MOMO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MOMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.3B annually — 13.5x FENG's $761M. MOMO is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FENG's -6.4%. On growth, FENG holds the edge at +22.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFENG logoFENGPhoenix New Media…MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$761M$10.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$43M$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$49M$800M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$685M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.6%+37.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.9%+12.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.4%+7.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.0%+6.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.3%-5.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.8%+32.1%
MOMO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FENG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricFENG logoFENGPhoenix New Media…MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.
Market CapShares × price$21M$2.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$60M$1.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.63x9.34x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.23x1.06x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.20x1.46x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.13x0.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.90x
FENG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MOMO leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

MOMO delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FENG. MOMO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FENG's 0.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOMO scores 7/9 vs FENG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFENG logoFENGPhoenix New Media…MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.5%+7.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.0%+5.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-7.7%+10.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-5.4%+10.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$551M-$5.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$608M$5.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$57M$129M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense18.04x
MOMO leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MOMO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth $6,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,776 for FENG. Over the past 12 months, MOMO leads with a +16.2% total return vs FENG's -18.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOMO at -1.9% vs FENG's -10.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFENG logoFENGPhoenix New Media…MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.0%+1.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-18.2%+16.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.4%-5.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.2%-36.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.6%-9.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.5%-1.9%
MOMO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FENG and MOMO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FENG is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOMO's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOMO currently trades 68.8% from its 52-week high vs FENG's 47.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFENG logoFENGPhoenix New Media…MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.51x0.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.65$9.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.63$5.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+47.3%+68.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.861.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5K648K
Evenly matched — FENG and MOMO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates FENG as "Buy" and MOMO as "Buy". MOMO is the only dividend payer here at 4.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFENG logoFENGPhoenix New Media…MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.10
# AnalystsCovering analysts516
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.99
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%+5.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MOMO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FENG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallHello Group Inc. (MOMO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FENG vs MOMO: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FENG or MOMO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) is the stronger pick with 1.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Hello Group Inc. (MOMO). Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (1. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FENG or MOMO?

On forward P/E, Phoenix New Media Limited is actually cheaper at 0.

2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FENG or MOMO?

Over the past 5 years, Hello Group Inc.

(MOMO) delivered a total return of -36. 7%, compared to -82. 2% for Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOMO returned -10. 3% versus FENG's -79. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FENG or MOMO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

51β versus Hello Group Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning MOMO is approximately 60% more volatile than FENG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Phoenix New Media Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FENG or MOMO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) is pulling ahead at 1.

7% versus -5. 9% for Hello Group Inc. (MOMO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phoenix New Media Limited grew EPS 48. 4% year-over-year, compared to -17. 2% for Hello Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MOMO leads at -7. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FENG or MOMO?

Hello Group Inc.

(MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus -7. 6% for Phoenix New Media Limited — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 12. 7% versus -9. 2% for FENG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FENG leads at 38. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FENG or MOMO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) trades at 0.

2x forward P/E versus 1. 1x for Hello Group Inc. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FENG or MOMO?

In this comparison, MOMO (4.

6% yield) pays a dividend. FENG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FENG or MOMO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc.

(MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 4. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -10. 3%, FENG: -79. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FENG and MOMO?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FENG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock. MOMO pays a dividend while FENG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FENG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MOMO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FENG and MOMO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FENG: 22.3% · MOMO: -5.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.