FENG
Phoenix New Media Limited
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-77.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FENG vs WB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WB
Weibo Corporation
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$1.33B
5Y Perf.-72.5%
FENG vs WB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FENG | WB |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $21M | $1.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $761M | $1.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-49M | $372M |
| Gross Margin | 45.6% | 78.2% |
| Operating Margin | -6.9% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.2x | 5.2x |
| Total Debt | $57M | $1.91B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $608M | $1.89B |
FENG vs WB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FENG
WB
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix New Media L… (FENG) | 100 | 22.8 | -77.2% |
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 100 | 27.5 | -72.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FENG vs WB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WB leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Phoenix New Media Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FENG
Phoenix New Media Limited
The Income Pick
FENG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.61
- Rev growth 1.7%, EPS growth 48.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 5.1%, current ratio 2.74x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
WB
Weibo Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
WB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -46.4% 10Y total return vs FENG's -79.6%
- 21.1% margin vs FENG's -6.4%
- 8.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FENG | 1.7% revenue growth vs WB's -0.3% |
| Value | FENG | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 5.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | WB | 21.1% margin vs FENG's -6.4% |
| Stability / Safety | FENG | Beta 0.61 vs WB's 0.93, lower leverage |
| Dividends | WB | 8.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WB | +7.8% vs FENG's -18.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WB | 5.7% ROA vs FENG's -3.0%, ROIC 10.3% vs -7.7% |
FENG vs WB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
FENG vs WB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWBLAGGINGFENG
FENGPhoenix New Media Lim…
1leads
WBWeibo Corporation
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FENGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WB5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FENG4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WB5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 2.3x FENG's $761M. WB is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FENG's -6.4%. On growth, FENG holds the edge at +22.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | WBWeibo Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $761M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$43M | $535M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$49M | $372M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +78.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +33.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.3% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.8% | +11.9% |
WB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FENG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | WBWeibo Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$60M | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.63x | 7.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.24x | 5.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.13x | 0.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.30x |
FENG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WB leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WB delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FENG. FENG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WB's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WB scores 7/9 vs FENG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | WBWeibo Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.5% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.7% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$551M | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $608M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $57M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.11x |
WB leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FENG and WB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WB five years ago would be worth $2,413 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,776 for FENG. Over the past 12 months, WB leads with a +7.8% total return vs FENG's -18.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FENG at -10.5% vs WB's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | WBWeibo Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.0% | -13.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.2% | +7.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.4% | -28.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | -75.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.6% | -46.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.5% | -10.6% |
Evenly matched — FENG and WB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FENG and WB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FENG is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WB currently trades 65.3% from its 52-week high vs FENG's 47.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | WBWeibo Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $12.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.63 | $8.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.3% | +65.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 43.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 1.1M |
Evenly matched — FENG and WB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FENG as "Buy" and WB as "Buy". WB is the only dividend payer here at 8.66% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | WBWeibo Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +8.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
WB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FENG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallWeibo Corporation (WB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FENG vs WB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FENG or WB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) is the stronger pick with 1.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Weibo Corporation (WB). Weibo Corporation (WB) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (5. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FENG or WB?
On forward P/E, Phoenix New Media Limited is actually cheaper at 0.
2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FENG or WB?
Over the past 5 years, Weibo Corporation (WB) delivered a total return of -75.
9%, compared to -82. 2% for Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WB returned -46. 4% versus FENG's -79. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FENG or WB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
61β versus Weibo Corporation's 0. 93β — meaning WB is approximately 52% more volatile than FENG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 53% for Weibo Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FENG or WB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) is pulling ahead at 1.
7% versus -0. 3% for Weibo Corporation (WB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phoenix New Media Limited grew EPS 48. 4% year-over-year, compared to -18. 9% for Weibo Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WB leads at -8. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FENG or WB?
Weibo Corporation (WB) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
1% net margin versus -7. 6% for Phoenix New Media Limited — meaning it keeps 17. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WB leads at 28. 2% versus -9. 2% for FENG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WB leads at 78. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FENG or WB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) trades at 0.
2x forward P/E versus 5. 2x for Weibo Corporation — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FENG or WB?
In this comparison, WB (8.
7% yield) pays a dividend. FENG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FENG or WB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weibo Corporation (WB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
93), 8. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WB: -46. 4%, FENG: -79. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FENG and WB?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FENG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WB is a small-cap deep-value stock. WB pays a dividend while FENG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 11%
- Gross Margin > 27%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 12%
- Dividend Yield > 3.4%
Revenue Growth>
%
(FENG: 22.3% · WB: 1.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.