Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FET vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
FET vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $635M | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $807M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-410M |
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | — |
| Forward P/E | 27.7x | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $232M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $98M |
FET vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forum Energy Techno… (FET) | 100 | 308.3 | +208.3% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 138.4 | +38.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FET vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.21
- Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth 92.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 79.6%, current ratio 2.17x
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 38.2% 10Y total return vs FET's -83.1%
- 35.6% revenue growth vs FET's -3.1%
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 27.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.6% revenue growth vs FET's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 27.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.8% margin vs SOC's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +311.5% vs SOC's -32.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.8% ROA vs SOC's -24.4%, ROIC 2.8% vs -44.6% |
FET vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FET vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FET leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FET and SOC operate at a comparable scale, with $807M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $807M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $56M | -$395M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$410M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | -$640M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | -138.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FET leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $635M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $832M | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -69.20x | -3.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.75x | 7.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.73x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.29x | 2464.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.86x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FET leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FET delivers a -2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-102 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FET scores 6/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -102.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | -24.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $197M | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $232M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.43x | -3.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FET leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FET five years ago would be worth $29,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,825 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, FET leads with a +311.5% total return vs SOC's -32.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FET at 37.7% vs SOC's 9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +46.5% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +311.5% | -32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +160.9% | +32.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +196.6% | +38.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.1% | +38.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.7% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FET is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FET currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 38.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $65.43 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.55 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.7% | +38.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 191K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FET as "Hold" and SOC as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | 0.0% |
FET leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
FET vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FET or SOC a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FET or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
(FET) delivered a total return of +196. 6%, compared to +38. 2% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +38. 2% versus FET's -83. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FET or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
(FET) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 25% more volatile than FET relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FET or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
grew EPS 92. 6% year-over-year, compared to 40. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FET or SOC?
Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1. 2% for Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FET leads at 2. 4% versus 0. 0% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FET leads at 27. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FET or SOC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 27. 7x for Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. — 19. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — FET or SOC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FET or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
(FET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21)). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FET: -83. 1%, SOC: +38. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FET and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.