Chemicals
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FF vs REX vs GPRE vs BIOX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Agricultural Inputs
FF vs REX vs GPRE vs BIOX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $211M | $1.60B | $1.15B | $30M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $96M | $651M | $1.94B | $318M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-49M | $50M | $-15M | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | 0.1% | 12.7% | 1.8% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | -55.3% | 8.6% | 1.2% | 0.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 62.8x | 46.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $21M | $508M | $277M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $196M | $182M | $33M |
FF vs REX vs GPRE vs BIOX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FutureFuel Corp. (FF) | 100 | 36.7 | -63.3% |
| REX American Resour… (REX) | 100 | 498.3 | +398.3% |
| Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) | 100 | 192.5 | +92.5% |
| Bioceres Crop Solut… (BIOX) | 100 | 7.1 | -92.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FF vs REX vs GPRE vs BIOX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.49, yield 0.0%
- 0.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
REX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -22.9%, EPS growth -4.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.1%
- 464.7% 10Y total return vs FF's 55.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 8.64x
- Beta 0.36, current ratio 8.64x
GPRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- -14.9% revenue growth vs FF's -60.7%
- Lower P/E (46.6x vs 62.8x)
- +336.6% vs BIOX's -88.5%
BIOX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -14.9% revenue growth vs FF's -60.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (46.6x vs 62.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.7% margin vs FF's -51.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs BIOX's 1.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +336.6% vs BIOX's -88.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs FF's -23.5%, ROIC 11.4% vs -39.8% |
FF vs REX vs GPRE vs BIOX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FF vs REX vs GPRE vs BIOX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REX leads in 3 of 6 categories
BIOX leads 1 • FF leads 0 • GPRE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 20.2x FF's $96M. REX is the more profitable business, keeping 7.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FF's -51.6%. On growth, REX holds the edge at +0.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $96M | $651M | $1.9B | $318M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$43M | $67M | $122M | $21M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$49M | $50M | -$15M | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$46M | $18M | $90M | $37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +12.7% | +1.8% | +39.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -55.3% | +8.6% | +1.2% | +0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -51.6% | +7.7% | -0.8% | -16.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -48.0% | +2.7% | +4.7% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.7% | +0.4% | -25.9% | -16.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.2% | +2.9% | +134.2% | -37.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BIOX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, REX's 16.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPRE's 103.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $211M | $1.6B | $1.1B | $30M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $159M | $1.4B | $1.5B | $274M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.25x | 29.50x | -9.14x | -0.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 62.81x | 46.62x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.55x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.60x | 103.82x | 20.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.20x | 2.50x | 0.55x | 0.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 2.67x | 1.44x | 0.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 17.84x | 0.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REX delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-29 for FF. REX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIOX's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REX scores 5/9 vs BIOX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.6% | +7.7% | -2.0% | -16.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.5% | +6.7% | -1.0% | -6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.8% | +11.4% | -5.2% | -0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -51.6% | +10.1% | -6.2% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x | 0.66x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$51M | -$175M | $326M | $244M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $196M | $182M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $21M | $508M | $277M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -130.01x | — | -0.08x | -0.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REX five years ago would be worth $34,996 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $317 for BIOX. Over the past 12 months, GPRE leads with a +336.6% total return vs BIOX's -88.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REX at 50.8% vs BIOX's -64.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +52.8% | +50.2% | +60.1% | -65.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.3% | +147.6% | +336.6% | -88.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.6% | +243.1% | -46.8% | -95.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.9% | +250.0% | -48.5% | -96.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.5% | +464.7% | +21.3% | -95.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.2% | +50.8% | -19.0% | -64.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FF and REX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REX is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIOX's 1.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FF currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs BIOX's 9.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.36x | 1.22x | 1.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.12 | $53.36 | $18.94 | $5.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.09 | $19.44 | $3.39 | $0.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +91.2% | +86.9% | +9.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.3 | 59.1 | 54.3 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 520K | 204K | 1.5M | 804K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FF as "Buy", REX as "Buy", GPRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.3% upside for REX (target: $60) vs -16.2% for GPRE (target: $14).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $60.00 | $13.80 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 3 | 20 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +2.6% | +3.1% |
REX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BIOX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FF vs REX vs GPRE vs BIOX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FF or REX or GPRE or BIOX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Green Plains Inc.
(GPRE) is the stronger pick with -14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 7% for FutureFuel Corp. (FF). REX American Resources Corporation (REX) offers the better valuation at 29. 5x trailing P/E (62. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FutureFuel Corp. (FF) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FF or REX or GPRE or BIOX?
On forward P/E, Green Plains Inc.
is actually cheaper at 46. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FF or REX or GPRE or BIOX?
Over the past 5 years, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) delivered a total return of +250.
0%, compared to -96. 8% for Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REX returned +464. 7% versus BIOX's -95. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FF or REX or GPRE or BIOX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
36β versus Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. 's 1. 94β — meaning BIOX is approximately 432% more volatile than REX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 94% for Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FF or REX or GPRE or BIOX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Green Plains Inc.
(GPRE) is pulling ahead at -14. 9% versus -60. 7% for FutureFuel Corp. (FF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: REX American Resources Corporation grew EPS -4. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1704. 7% for Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIOX leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FF or REX or GPRE or BIOX?
REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
1% net margin versus -51. 6% for FutureFuel Corp. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REX leads at 10. 0% versus -55. 3% for FF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIOX leads at 39. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FF or REX or GPRE or BIOX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Green Plains Inc.
(GPRE) trades at 46. 6x forward P/E versus 62. 8x for REX American Resources Corporation — 16. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REX: 23. 3% to $60. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FF or REX or GPRE or BIOX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FF or REX or GPRE or BIOX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
36), +464. 7% 10Y return). Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REX: +464. 7%, BIOX: -95. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FF and REX and GPRE and BIOX?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.