Consulting Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FGO vs HIHO vs JPM vs BAC vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
FGO vs HIHO vs JPM vs BAC vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | — | $3M | $869.15B | $404.74B | $302M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $6M | $280.33B | $191.57B | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-535K | $57.05B | $30.51B | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 78.5% | 29.4% | 60.0% | 56.1% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | 37.6% | -21.6% | 25.9% | 19.7% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.0x | 14.0x | 12.0x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $810K | $942.38B | $365.90B | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $6M | $343.34B | $231.84B | $40M |
FGO vs HIHO vs JPM vs BAC vs FLXS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO) | 100 | 32.6 | -67.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 330.8 | +230.8% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 225.8 | +125.8% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 447.2 | +347.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGO vs HIHO vs JPM vs BAC vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 40.0% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5%
- 33.2% margin vs HIHO's -8.7%
- 34.4% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 95.7% vs -31.7%
HIHO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 15.4%
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 111.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -15.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.46, yield 15.4%, current ratio 2.79x
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 433.9% 10Y total return vs BAC's 324.7%
- NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
BAC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.78 vs JPM's 1.07
- Lower P/E (12.0x vs 30.0x)
FLXS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +82.7% vs HIHO's -60.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.0% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 30.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.2% margin vs HIHO's -8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs FLXS's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 15.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.7% vs HIHO's -60.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.4% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 95.7% vs -31.7% |
FGO vs HIHO vs JPM vs BAC vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FGO vs HIHO vs JPM vs BAC vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
FLXS leads 1 • HIHO leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • BAC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 45634.5x HIHO's $6M. FGO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIHO's -8.7%. On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $6M | $280.3B | $191.6B | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$653,000 | $81.4B | $40.0B | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$535,000 | $57.0B | $30.5B | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $0 | $100.9B | $12.6B | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.5% | +29.4% | +60.0% | +56.1% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | -21.6% | +25.9% | +19.7% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | -8.7% | +20.4% | +15.9% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | -6.2% | +36.0% | +6.6% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -44.3% | — | — | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.5% | +16.0% | +18.3% | -27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FGO and HIHO each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 53% valuation discount to HIHO's 30.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BAC offers better value at 0.91x vs JPM's 1.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $3M | $869.1B | $404.7B | $302M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | -$2M | $1.47T | $538.8B | $321M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | 30.05x | 15.52x | 14.04x | 15.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 13.97x | 12.02x | 11.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.19x | 0.91x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -26.68x | 18.03x | 13.47x | 10.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.43x | 3.11x | 2.11x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.51x | 2.40x | 1.33x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.62x | 32.09x | 8.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FGO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FGO delivers a 65.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $-9 for HIHO. HIHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +65.5% | -9.0% | +15.9% | +10.1% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +34.4% | -6.4% | +1.3% | +0.9% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +95.7% | -31.7% | +4.5% | +3.5% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +73.8% | -7.7% | +8.9% | +4.5% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.13x | 2.60x | 1.21x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | -$5M | $599.0B | $134.1B | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $6M | $343.3B | $231.8B | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $810,000 | $942.4B | $365.9B | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.74x | 0.48x | 380.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,255 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,758 for HIHO. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +82.7% total return vs HIHO's -60.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 46.2% vs HIHO's -24.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -47.1% | -3.5% | -3.1% | +42.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | -60.6% | +18.8% | +22.0% | +82.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -56.6% | +131.9% | +94.2% | +212.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -62.4% | +102.6% | +36.4% | +21.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -44.0% | +433.9% | +324.7% | +53.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -24.3% | +32.4% | +24.8% | +46.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HIHO and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HIHO is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLXS's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs HIHO's 32.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.46x | 0.95x | 0.89x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.00 | $2.21 | $337.25 | $57.55 | $60.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $0.61 | $262.71 | $43.66 | $29.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +32.8% | +92.2% | +93.2% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | — | 47.7 | 59.6 | 62.7 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 88K | 7.1M | 32.3M | 55K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HIHO and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.0% upside for BAC (target: $61) vs -4.4% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, HIHO offers the higher dividend yield at 15.43% vs FLXS's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $338.78 | $61.13 | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 61 | 54 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +15.4% | +1.9% | +2.4% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 15 | 12 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | $5.95 | $1.27 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% | +4.0% | +5.3% | +0.9% |
FGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLXS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
FGO vs HIHO vs JPM vs BAC vs FLXS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGO or HIHO or JPM or BAC or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the stronger pick with 40.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FGO or HIHO or JPM or BAC or FLXS?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.
0x versus Highway Holdings Limited at 30. 0x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank of America Corporation wins at 0. 78x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FGO or HIHO or JPM or BAC or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +102. 6%, compared to -62. 4% for Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +433. 9% versus HIHO's -44. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FGO or HIHO or JPM or BAC or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
46β versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning FLXS is approximately 191% more volatile than HIHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FGO or HIHO or JPM or BAC or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is pulling ahead at 40.
0% versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Highway Holdings Limited grew EPS 111. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLXS leads at -6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FGO or HIHO or JPM or BAC or FLXS?
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.
2% net margin versus 1. 4% for Highway Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FGO leads at 37. 6% versus -7. 2% for HIHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FGO leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FGO or HIHO or JPM or BAC or FLXS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 0x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BAC: 14. 0% to $61. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — FGO or HIHO or JPM or BAC or FLXS?
In this comparison, HIHO (15.
4% yield), BAC (2. 4% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. FGO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FGO or HIHO or JPM or BAC or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
46), 15. 4% yield). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FGO and HIHO and JPM and BAC and FLXS?
These companies operate in different sectors (FGO (Industrials) and HIHO (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock. HIHO, JPM, BAC, FLXS pay a dividend while FGO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.