Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FHI logo
FHI
BLK logo
BLK
KO logo
KO
STT logo
STT
BEN logo
BEN
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FHI vs BLK vs KO vs STT vs BEN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.49B
5Y Perf.+149.2%
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$173.68B
5Y Perf.+93.0%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$341.71B
5Y Perf.+77.7%
STT
State Street Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$48.64B
5Y Perf.+164.8%
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$17.17B
5Y Perf.+57.6%

FHI vs BLK vs KO vs STT vs BEN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FHI logoFHI
BLK logoBLK
KO logoKO
STT logoSTT
BEN logoBEN
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset ManagementBeverages - Non-AlcoholicAsset ManagementAsset Management
Market Cap$4.49B$173.68B$341.71B$48.64B$17.17B
Revenue (TTM)$1.86B$24.22B$49.28B$22.63B$9.03B
Net Income (TTM)$399M$5.55B$13.70B$2.94B$812M
Gross Margin51.5%50.5%61.7%61.4%73.8%
Operating Margin27.4%29.1%29.3%16.5%9.3%
Forward P/E11.6x19.7x24.3x13.5x12.1x
Total Debt$457M$15.00B$45.49B$29.80B$13.30B
Cash & Equiv.$584M$11.47B$10.27B$131.36B$3.57B

FHI vs BLK vs KO vs STT vs BENLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FHI
BLK
KO
STT
BEN
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Federated Hermes, I… (FHI)100249.2+149.2%
BlackRock, Inc. (BLK)100193.0+93.0%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100177.7+77.7%
State Street Corpor… (STT)100264.8+164.8%
Franklin Resources,… (BEN)100157.6+57.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FHI vs BLK vs KO vs STT vs BEN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FHI leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. BlackRock, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. KO, STT, and BEN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FHI emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
The Banking Pick

FHI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.4%
  • Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth 58.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 36.2%, current ratio 41.26x
  • PEG 1.19 vs BLK's 9.19
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BLK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 18.7% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
Best for: growth
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.

  • 27.8% margin vs BEN's 9.0%
Best for: quality
STT
State Street Corporation
The Banking Pick

STT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 225.7% 10Y total return vs BLK's 248.2%
  • NIM 0.8% vs FHI's 0.5%
  • +72.8% vs BLK's +9.4%
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BEN is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 4.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBLK logoBLK18.7% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueFHI logoFHILower P/E (11.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.19 vs 2.17
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs BEN's 9.0%
Stability / SafetyFHI logoFHIBeta 0.70 vs BEN's 1.26, lower leverage
DividendsBEN logoBEN4.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%
Momentum (1Y)STT logoSTT+72.8% vs BLK's +9.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FHI logoFHI18.2% ROA vs STT's 0.8%, ROIC 24.1% vs 4.7%

FHI vs BLK vs KO vs STT vs BEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FHIFederated Hermes, Inc.
FY 2025
Federated Hermes Funds
84.0%$1.5B
Separate accounts
14.2%$256M
Other
1.8%$33M
BLKBlackRock, Inc.
FY 2025
Investment Advice
86.3%$19.2B
Investment Performance
6.4%$1.4B
Distribution and Shareholder Service
6.1%$1.4B
Service, Other
1.2%$277M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
STTState Street Corporation
FY 2025
Investment Servicing
80.9%$11.3B
Investment Management
18.8%$2.6B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Excluding Corporate Nonsegment
0.3%$42M
BENFranklin Resources, Inc.
FY 2025
Investment Advisory, Management and Administrative Service
79.6%$7.0B
Sales And Distribution Fees
16.8%$1.5B
Shareholder Service
3.0%$265M
Service, Other
0.6%$50M

FHI vs BLK vs KO vs STT vs BEN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFHILAGGINGBEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 26.5x FHI's $1.9B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEN's 9.0%.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…BEN logoBENFranklin Resource…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$24.2B$49.3B$22.6B$9.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$527M$8.1B$15.5B$4.3B$1.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$399M$5.6B$13.7B$2.9B$812M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$307M$3.6B$12.6B$2.7B$938M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+51.5%+50.5%+61.7%+61.4%+73.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.4%+29.1%+29.3%+16.5%+9.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.4%+22.9%+27.8%+13.0%+9.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.5%+14.8%+25.5%+12.1%+10.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.6%-22.7%+18.2%+23.0%+100.0%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FHI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.5x trailing earnings, FHI trades at a 68% valuation discount to BEN's 36.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FHI offers better value at 1.19x vs BLK's 13.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…BEN logoBENFranklin Resource…
Market CapShares × price$4.5B$173.7B$341.7B$48.6B$17.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.4B$177.2B$376.9B-$52.9B$26.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS11.51x29.65x26.12x17.91x36.32x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.56x19.74x24.27x13.54x12.06x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.19x13.81x2.34x2.17x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.82x22.99x25.45x-12.35x23.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.48x7.17x7.13x2.15x1.96x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.51x2.82x9.99x1.75x1.20x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.23x46.33x64.52x11.34x18.84x
FHI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FHI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for BEN. BLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FHI scores 8/9 vs BLK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…BEN logoBENFranklin Resource…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+29.5%+9.9%+41.1%+10.8%+5.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+18.2%+3.6%+13.1%+0.8%+2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+24.1%+7.5%+15.8%+4.7%+1.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.3%+4.6%+17.3%+4.5%+2.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985776
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.36x0.24x1.33x1.07x0.94x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$127M$3.5B$35.2B-$101.6B$9.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$584M$11.5B$10.3B$131.4B$3.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$457M$15.0B$45.5B$29.8B$13.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense44.07x10.70x10.70x0.43x15.19x
FHI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

STT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in STT five years ago would be worth $23,075 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,555 for BEN. Over the past 12 months, STT leads with a +72.8% total return vs BLK's +9.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STT at 34.3% vs KO's 11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…BEN logoBENFranklin Resource…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+14.2%-2.2%+16.4%+31.7%+40.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+43.1%+9.4%+17.7%+72.8%+52.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+69.2%+61.1%+39.3%+142.3%+40.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+101.8%+36.8%+65.3%+130.8%+25.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+144.4%+248.2%+115.0%+225.7%+39.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.2%+17.2%+11.7%+34.3%+12.1%
STT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FHI and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEN's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FHI currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs BLK's 86.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…BEN logoBENFranklin Resource…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.70x1.25x-0.23x1.14x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$59.83$1219.94$84.04$174.66$34.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$41.71$917.39$65.35$96.27$21.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.7%+86.1%+94.5%+96.4%+96.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.256.149.274.666.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded734K600K13.6M1.9M4.2M
Evenly matched — FHI and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KO and BEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FHI as "Hold", BLK as "Buy", KO as "Buy", STT as "Buy", BEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.0% upside for BLK (target: $1302) vs -4.0% for STT (target: $162). For income investors, BEN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs STT's 1.84%.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…BEN logoBENFranklin Resource…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$57.50$1301.63$86.13$161.50$32.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2133483727
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.4%+1.9%+2.6%+1.8%+4.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises31656152
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.40$20.24$2.04$3.09$1.33
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.9%+1.1%+0.2%+2.7%+1.4%
Evenly matched — KO and BEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FHI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallFederated Hermes, Inc. (FHI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FHI vs BLK vs KO vs STT vs BEN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FHI or BLK or KO or STT or BEN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, BlackRock, Inc.

(BLK) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FHI or BLK or KO or STT or BEN?

On trailing P/E, Federated Hermes, Inc.

(FHI) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Franklin Resources, Inc. at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, Federated Hermes, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Federated Hermes, Inc. wins at 1. 19x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 19x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FHI or BLK or KO or STT or BEN?

Over the past 5 years, State Street Corporation (STT) delivered a total return of +130.

8%, compared to +25. 5% for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLK returned +248. 2% versus BEN's +39. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FHI or BLK or KO or STT or BEN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

23β versus Franklin Resources, Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning BEN is approximately -638% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FHI or BLK or KO or STT or BEN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BlackRock, Inc.

(BLK) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Federated Hermes, Inc. grew EPS 58. 8% year-over-year, compared to -15. 7% for BlackRock, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FHI or BLK or KO or STT or BEN?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 6. 0% for Franklin Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FHI leads at 29. 5% versus 6. 9% for BEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEN leads at 80. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FHI or BLK or KO or STT or BEN more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 19x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 19x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLK: 24. 0% to $1301. 63.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FHI or BLK or KO or STT or BEN?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 8% for State Street Corporation (STT).

09

Is FHI or BLK or KO or STT or BEN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, BEN: +39. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FHI and BLK and KO and STT and BEN?

These companies operate in different sectors (FHI (Financial Services) and BLK (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and STT (Financial Services) and BEN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FHI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BLK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.