Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FHI logo
FHI
DHIL logo
DHIL
BEN logo
BEN
VRTS logo
VRTS
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FHI vs DHIL vs BEN vs VRTS vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.49B
5Y Perf.+149.2%
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$473M
5Y Perf.+51.4%
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$17.17B
5Y Perf.+57.6%
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$948M
5Y Perf.+21.8%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$908.57B
5Y Perf.+245.8%

FHI vs DHIL vs BEN vs VRTS vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FHI logoFHI
DHIL logoDHIL
BEN logoBEN
VRTS logoVRTS
JPM logoJPM
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$4.49B$473M$17.17B$948M$908.57B
Revenue (TTM)$1.86B$158M$9.03B$831M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$399M$49M$812M$138M$57.05B
Gross Margin51.5%96.0%73.8%74.9%60.0%
Operating Margin27.4%38.4%9.3%17.4%25.9%
Forward P/E11.6x9.5x12.1x5.8x14.6x
Total Debt$457M$6.40B$13.30B$2.84B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$584M$42M$3.57B$477M$343.34B

FHI vs DHIL vs BEN vs VRTS vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FHI
DHIL
BEN
VRTS
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Federated Hermes, I… (FHI)100249.2+149.2%
Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL)100151.4+51.4%
Franklin Resources,… (BEN)100157.6+57.6%
Virtus Investment P… (VRTS)100121.8+21.8%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100345.8+245.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FHI vs DHIL vs BEN vs VRTS vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: VRTS and JPM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. FHI, DHIL, and BEN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
The Banking Pick

FHI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth 58.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 36.2%, current ratio 41.26x
  • 11.0% NII/revenue growth vs VRTS's -8.0%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

DHIL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.51, yield 5.7%, current ratio 75115.85x
  • Beta 0.51 vs BEN's 1.26
Best for: defensive
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +52.1% vs VRTS's -13.2%
Best for: momentum
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
The Banking Pick

VRTS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 6.6%
  • PEG 0.39 vs FHI's 1.19
  • Lower P/E (5.8x vs 12.1x)
  • 6.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and bank quality is your priority.

  • 481.2% 10Y total return vs FHI's 144.4%
  • NIM 2.2% vs FHI's 0.5%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BEN's 0.7%
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFHI logoFHI11.0% NII/revenue growth vs VRTS's -8.0%
ValueVRTS logoVRTSLower P/E (5.8x vs 12.1x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyDHIL logoDHILBeta 0.51 vs BEN's 1.26
DividendsVRTS logoVRTS6.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%
Momentum (1Y)BEN logoBEN+52.1% vs VRTS's -13.2%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs BEN's 0.7%

FHI vs DHIL vs BEN vs VRTS vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FHIFederated Hermes, Inc.
FY 2025
Federated Hermes Funds
84.0%$1.5B
Separate accounts
14.2%$256M
Other
1.8%$33M
DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Investment Advisory Services
95.1%$140M
Mutual Fund Administrative Services
4.9%$7M
BENFranklin Resources, Inc.
FY 2025
Investment Advisory, Management and Administrative Service
79.6%$7.0B
Sales And Distribution Fees
16.8%$1.5B
Shareholder Service
3.0%$265M
Service, Other
0.6%$50M
VRTSVirtus Investment Partners, Inc.
FY 2025
Investment Management Fees
50.0%$725M
Open End Funds
19.8%$287M
Retail Separate Accounts
14.5%$210M
Institutional Accounts
11.6%$168M
Closed End Funds
4.2%$61M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

FHI vs DHIL vs BEN vs VRTS vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDHILLAGGINGBEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DHIL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1775.8x DHIL's $158M. DHIL is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEN's 9.0%.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…DHIL logoDHILDiamond Hill Inve…BEN logoBENFranklin Resource…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$158M$9.0B$831M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$527M$62M$1.2B$205M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$399M$49M$812M$138M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$307M$44.5B$938M-$67M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+51.5%+96.0%+73.8%+74.9%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.4%+38.4%+9.3%+17.4%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.4%+30.9%+9.0%+16.7%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.5%+281.7%+10.4%-8.1%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.6%+25.3%+100.0%+10.9%+16.0%
DHIL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

VRTS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 7.1x trailing earnings, VRTS trades at a 80% valuation discount to BEN's 36.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VRTS offers better value at 0.48x vs FHI's 1.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…DHIL logoDHILDiamond Hill Inve…BEN logoBENFranklin Resource…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$4.5B$473M$17.2B$948M$908.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.4B$6.8B$26.9B$3.3B$1.51T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS11.51x9.77x36.32x7.09x16.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.56x9.48x12.06x5.81x14.60x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.19x1.18x0.48x0.92x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.82x110.39x23.68x16.19x18.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.48x3.00x1.96x1.14x3.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.51x2.70x1.20x0.95x2.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.23x18.84x9.01x
VRTS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FHI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FHI delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $6 for BEN. FHI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FHI scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…DHIL logoDHILDiamond Hill Inve…BEN logoBENFranklin Resource…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+29.5%+27.0%+5.6%+13.5%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+18.2%+19.5%+2.5%+3.6%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+24.1%+1.3%+1.6%+3.0%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.3%+26.0%+2.0%+3.7%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–986655
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.36x36.26x0.94x2.74x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$127M$6.4B$9.7B$2.4B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$584M$42M$3.6B$477M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$457M$6.4B$13.3B$2.8B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense44.07x15.19x2.15x0.74x
FHI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,784 for VRTS. Over the past 12 months, BEN leads with a +52.1% total return vs VRTS's -13.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs VRTS's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…DHIL logoDHILDiamond Hill Inve…BEN logoBENFranklin Resource…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+14.2%+2.8%+40.3%-9.9%+0.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+43.1%+31.6%+52.1%-13.2%+20.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+69.2%+11.0%+40.7%-19.9%+138.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+101.8%+34.3%+25.5%-32.2%+135.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+144.4%+37.9%+39.9%+144.2%+481.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.2%+3.6%+12.1%-7.1%+33.7%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

DHIL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

DHIL is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEN's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs VRTS's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…DHIL logoDHILDiamond Hill Inve…BEN logoBENFranklin Resource…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.70x0.51x1.26x1.07x0.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$59.83$175.03$34.17$215.06$338.09
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$41.71$114.11$21.11$121.61$269.72
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.7%+100.0%+96.7%+65.8%+96.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.270.566.749.872.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded734K16K4.2M97K7.4M
DHIL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — VRTS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FHI as "Hold", BEN as "Hold", VRTS as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.5% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -4.2% for VRTS (target: $136). For income investors, VRTS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.58% vs JPM's 1.83%.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…DHIL logoDHILDiamond Hill Inve…BEN logoBENFranklin Resource…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$57.50$32.00$135.67$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts21271161
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.4%+5.7%+4.0%+6.6%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises302815
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.40$9.98$1.33$9.32$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.9%+3.6%+1.4%+6.3%+3.8%
Evenly matched — VRTS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

DHIL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). VRTS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallDiamond Hill Investment Gro… (DHIL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FHI vs DHIL vs BEN vs VRTS vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FHI or DHIL or BEN or VRTS or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Federated Hermes, Inc.

(FHI) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the better valuation at 7. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FHI or DHIL or BEN or VRTS or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.

(VRTS) is the cheapest at 7. 1x versus Franklin Resources, Inc. at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. wins at 0. 39x versus Federated Hermes, Inc. 's 1. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FHI or DHIL or BEN or VRTS or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -32. 2% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus DHIL's +37. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FHI or DHIL or BEN or VRTS or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.

(DHIL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Franklin Resources, Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning BEN is approximately 147% more volatile than DHIL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FHI or DHIL or BEN or VRTS or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Federated Hermes, Inc.

(FHI) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Federated Hermes, Inc. grew EPS 58. 8% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FHI or DHIL or BEN or VRTS or JPM?

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.

(DHIL) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus 6. 0% for Franklin Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DHIL leads at 38. 4% versus 6. 9% for BEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FHI or DHIL or BEN or VRTS or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 39x versus Federated Hermes, Inc. 's 1. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 6x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 4. 5% to $339. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FHI or DHIL or BEN or VRTS or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the highest yield at 6. 6%, versus 1. 8% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is FHI or DHIL or BEN or VRTS or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.

(DHIL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), 5. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHIL: +37. 9%, BEN: +39. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FHI and DHIL and BEN and VRTS and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FHI is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; VRTS is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.