Asset Management
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FHI vs DHIL vs JPM vs BLK vs STT vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
Asset Management
Asset Management
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
FHI vs DHIL vs JPM vs BLK vs STT vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified | Asset Management | Asset Management | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $4.49B | $473M | $908.57B | $173.68B | $48.64B | $341.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.86B | $158M | $280.33B | $24.22B | $22.63B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $399M | $49M | $57.05B | $5.55B | $2.94B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 51.5% | 96.0% | 60.0% | 50.5% | 61.4% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 27.4% | 38.4% | 25.9% | 29.1% | 16.5% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 9.5x | 14.6x | 19.7x | 13.5x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $457M | $6.40B | $942.38B | $15.00B | $29.80B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $584M | $42M | $343.34B | $11.47B | $131.36B | $10.27B |
FHI vs DHIL vs JPM vs BLK vs STT vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federated Hermes, I… (FHI) | 100 | 249.2 | +149.2% |
| Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL) | 100 | 151.4 | +51.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) | 100 | 193.0 | +93.0% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 264.8 | +164.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FHI vs DHIL vs JPM vs BLK vs STT vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FHI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth 58.8%
DHIL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, current ratio 75115.85x
- Beta 0.51, yield 5.7%, current ratio 75115.85x
- 30.9% margin vs STT's 13.0%
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs STT's 225.7%
- PEG 0.83 vs BLK's 9.19
- NIM 2.2% vs FHI's 0.5%
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.83 vs 2.17
BLK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 18.7% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
STT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +72.8% vs BLK's +9.4%
KO doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.83 vs 2.17 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs STT's 13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs BLK's 1.25 | |
| Dividends | 5.7% yield, vs KO's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.8% vs BLK's +9.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.5% ROA vs STT's 0.8%, ROIC 1.3% vs 4.7% |
FHI vs DHIL vs JPM vs BLK vs STT vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FHI vs DHIL vs JPM vs BLK vs STT vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STT leads in 2 of 6 categories
DHIL leads 1 • FHI leads 1 • JPM leads 0 • BLK leads 0 • KO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHIL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1775.8x DHIL's $158M. DHIL is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STT's 13.0%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $158M | $280.3B | $24.2B | $22.6B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $527M | $62M | $81.4B | $8.1B | $4.3B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $399M | $49M | $57.0B | $5.6B | $2.9B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $307M | $44.5B | $100.9B | $3.6B | $2.7B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.5% | +96.0% | +60.0% | +50.5% | +61.4% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +38.4% | +25.9% | +29.1% | +16.5% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +30.9% | +20.4% | +22.9% | +13.0% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +281.7% | +36.0% | +14.8% | +12.1% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +25.3% | +16.0% | -22.7% | +23.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
STT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, DHIL trades at a 67% valuation discount to BLK's 29.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs BLK's 13.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $473M | $908.6B | $173.7B | $48.6B | $341.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $6.8B | $1.51T | $177.2B | -$52.9B | $376.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.51x | 9.77x | 16.22x | 29.65x | 17.91x | 26.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.56x | 9.48x | 14.60x | 19.74x | 13.54x | 24.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.19x | 1.18x | 0.92x | 13.81x | 2.17x | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.82x | 110.39x | 18.52x | 22.99x | -12.35x | 25.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.48x | 3.00x | 3.25x | 7.17x | 2.15x | 7.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.51x | 2.70x | 2.51x | 2.82x | 1.75x | 9.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.23x | — | 9.01x | 46.33x | 11.34x | 64.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FHI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for BLK. BLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FHI scores 8/9 vs BLK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.5% | +27.0% | +15.9% | +9.9% | +10.8% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.2% | +19.5% | +1.3% | +3.6% | +0.8% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +24.1% | +1.3% | +4.5% | +7.5% | +4.7% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.3% | +26.0% | +8.9% | +4.6% | +4.5% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 36.26x | 2.60x | 0.24x | 1.07x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$127M | $6.4B | $599.0B | $3.5B | -$101.6B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $584M | $42M | $343.3B | $11.5B | $131.4B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $457M | $6.4B | $942.4B | $15.0B | $29.8B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 44.07x | — | 0.74x | 10.70x | 0.43x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,427 for DHIL. Over the past 12 months, STT leads with a +72.8% total return vs BLK's +9.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STT at 34.3% vs DHIL's 3.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.2% | +2.8% | +0.8% | -2.2% | +31.7% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.1% | +31.6% | +20.9% | +9.4% | +72.8% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.2% | +11.0% | +138.8% | +61.1% | +142.3% | +39.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.8% | +34.3% | +135.5% | +36.8% | +130.8% | +65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.4% | +37.9% | +481.2% | +248.2% | +225.7% | +115.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.2% | +3.6% | +33.7% | +17.2% | +34.3% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DHIL and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLK's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs BLK's 86.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.51x | 0.87x | 1.25x | 1.14x | -0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.83 | $175.03 | $338.09 | $1219.94 | $174.66 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.71 | $114.11 | $269.72 | $917.39 | $96.27 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +100.0% | +96.2% | +86.1% | +96.4% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 70.5 | 72.1 | 56.1 | 74.6 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 734K | 16K | 7.4M | 600K | 1.9M | 13.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DHIL and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FHI as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", BLK as "Buy", STT as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.0% upside for BLK (target: $1302) vs -4.0% for STT (target: $162). For income investors, DHIL offers the higher dividend yield at 5.71% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.50 | — | $339.75 | $1301.63 | $161.50 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | — | 61 | 33 | 37 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +5.7% | +1.8% | +1.9% | +1.8% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $9.98 | $5.95 | $20.24 | $3.09 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.9% | +3.6% | +3.8% | +1.1% | +2.7% | +0.2% |
STT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). DHIL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FHI vs DHIL vs JPM vs BLK vs STT vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FHI or DHIL or JPM or BLK or STT or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FHI or DHIL or JPM or BLK or STT or KO?
On trailing P/E, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus BlackRock, Inc. at 29. 6x. On forward P/E, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FHI or DHIL or JPM or BLK or STT or KO?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to +34. 3% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus DHIL's +37. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FHI or DHIL or JPM or BLK or STT or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 1. 25β — meaning BLK is approximately -627% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FHI or DHIL or JPM or BLK or STT or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Federated Hermes, Inc. grew EPS 58. 8% year-over-year, compared to -15. 7% for BlackRock, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FHI or DHIL or JPM or BLK or STT or KO?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus 13. 0% for State Street Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DHIL leads at 38. 4% versus 16. 5% for STT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FHI or DHIL or JPM or BLK or STT or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLK: 24. 0% to $1301. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — FHI or DHIL or JPM or BLK or STT or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 1. 8% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is FHI or DHIL or JPM or BLK or STT or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, BLK: +248. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FHI and DHIL and JPM and BLK and STT and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (FHI (Financial Services) and DHIL (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and BLK (Financial Services) and STT (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FHI is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BLK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; STT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.