Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FIEE vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs ETN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Security & Protection Services
Industrial - Machinery
FIEE vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs ETN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Security & Protection Services | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $24M | $11.27B | $26.19B | $5.96B | $155.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $1.13B | $6.00B | $7.47B | $28.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $187M | $906M | $-527M | $3.99B |
| Gross Margin | 83.0% | 30.1% | 35.5% | 29.4% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | -48.4% | 19.8% | 20.8% | 8.1% | 18.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 56.4x | 24.9x | 12.9x | 30.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2M | $2.61B | $3.17B | $11.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30K | $451M | $483M | $661M | $622M |
FIEE vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs ETN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FiEE, Inc. (FIEE) | 100 | 12.1 | -87.9% |
| Powell Industries, … (POWL) | 100 | 3488.0 | +3388.0% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 402.4 | +302.4% |
| Resideo Technologie… (REZI) | 100 | 563.0 | +463.0% |
| Eaton Corporation p… (ETN) | 100 | 472.9 | +372.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FIEE vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs ETN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIEE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +457.3% vs ETN's +32.2%
POWL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth 20.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 26.8% 10Y total return vs ETN's 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.08, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 2.09x
- PEG 0.94 vs ETN's 1.23
HUBB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.32, yield 1.1%
- Beta 1.32, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.72x
- Beta 1.32 vs REZI's 2.24, lower leverage
- 1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ETN's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
REZI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 10.5% revenue growth vs FIEE's -97.5%
Among these 5 stocks, ETN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs FIEE's -97.5% | |
| Value | PEG 0.94 vs 1.23 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs FIEE's -56.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs REZI's 2.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ETN's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +457.3% vs ETN's +32.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.9% ROA vs FIEE's -13.2% |
FIEE vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs ETN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FIEE vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs ETN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
POWL leads in 2 of 6 categories
FIEE leads 1 • REZI leads 1 • HUBB leads 0 • ETN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIEE leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETN is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.5B annually — 14371.2x FIEE's $2M. POWL is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIEE's -56.4%. On growth, ETN holds the edge at +16.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $1.1B | $6.0B | $7.5B | $28.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$643,800 | $232M | $1.5B | $802M | $5.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | $187M | $906M | -$527M | $4.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $143M | $909M | -$1.3B | $4.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.0% | +30.1% | +35.5% | +29.4% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -48.4% | +19.8% | +20.8% | +8.1% | +18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -56.4% | +16.5% | +15.1% | -7.1% | +14.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +125.2% | +12.6% | +15.2% | -16.8% | +16.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +6.5% | +11.1% | +2.0% | +16.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.8% | -0.8% | +8.3% | +11.4% | -9.4% |
Valuation Metrics
REZI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.8x trailing earnings, HUBB trades at a 52% valuation discount to POWL's 62.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), POWL offers better value at 1.04x vs ETN's 1.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $11.3B | $26.2B | $6.0B | $155.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $10.8B | $28.3B | $8.5B | $166.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.87x | 62.46x | 29.78x | -10.54x | 38.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 56.41x | 24.95x | 12.91x | 30.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.04x | 1.43x | — | 1.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 48.07x | 20.79x | 10.55x | 27.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 37.84x | 10.21x | 4.48x | 0.80x | 5.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 17.62x | 6.84x | 2.03x | 8.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 72.81x | 29.94x | — | 34.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
POWL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
POWL delivers a 28.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-29 for FIEE. POWL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REZI's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBB scores 7/9 vs FIEE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.6% | +28.6% | +24.4% | -18.1% | +20.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.2% | +16.9% | +11.6% | -6.2% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +90.6% | +17.1% | +9.0% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +37.5% | +20.1% | +9.3% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x | 0.68x | 1.09x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30,162 | -$449M | $2.1B | $2.5B | $10.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30,162 | $451M | $483M | $661M | $622M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2M | $2.6B | $3.2B | $11.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -365.59x | — | 16.90x | -2.36x | 16.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
POWL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in POWL five years ago would be worth $255,667 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $878 for FIEE. Over the past 12 months, FIEE leads with a +457.3% total return vs ETN's +32.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors POWL at 162.5% vs FIEE's 15.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +88.4% | +163.4% | +6.7% | +13.1% | +23.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +457.3% | +422.2% | +40.5% | +98.3% | +32.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.3% | +1709.2% | +87.7% | +142.4% | +143.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | +2456.7% | +161.4% | +39.1% | +185.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +2683.6% | +410.2% | +37.1% | +614.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.1% | +162.5% | +23.4% | +34.3% | +34.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HUBB and ETN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUBB is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REZI's 2.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ETN currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs POWL's 71.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.21x | 2.08x | 1.32x | 2.24x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.95 | $434.00 | $565.50 | $45.29 | $435.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.01 | $54.75 | $353.52 | $19.34 | $304.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.0% | +71.3% | +87.1% | +87.8% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.4 | 73.9 | 38.0 | 56.4 | 48.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 685K | 547K | 1.1M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HUBB and ETN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: POWL as "Hold", HUBB as "Hold", REZI as "Buy", ETN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for HUBB (target: $545) vs -23.2% for POWL (target: $238). For income investors, HUBB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs POWL's 0.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $237.67 | $545.43 | $40.00 | $397.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 17 | 7 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | +1.1% | +0.6% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 12 | 2 | 24 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.35 | $5.35 | $0.23 | $4.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +1.2% |
POWL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FIEE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FIEE vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs ETN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIEE or POWL or HUBB or REZI or ETN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Resideo Technologies, Inc.
(REZI) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -97. 5% for FiEE, Inc. (FIEE). Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) offers the better valuation at 29. 8x trailing P/E (24. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIEE or POWL or HUBB or REZI or ETN?
On trailing P/E, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the cheapest at 29.
8x versus Powell Industries, Inc. at 62. 5x. On forward P/E, Resideo Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Powell Industries, Inc. wins at 0. 94x versus Eaton Corporation plc's 1. 23x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIEE or POWL or HUBB or REZI or ETN?
Over the past 5 years, Powell Industries, Inc.
(POWL) delivered a total return of +24. 6%, compared to -91. 2% for FiEE, Inc. (FIEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: POWL returned +26. 8% versus FIEE's -88. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIEE or POWL or HUBB or REZI or ETN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
32β versus Resideo Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 24β — meaning REZI is approximately 70% more volatile than HUBB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 109% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FIEE or POWL or HUBB or REZI or ETN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Resideo Technologies, Inc.
(REZI) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -97. 5% for FiEE, Inc. (FIEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FiEE, Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to -718. 0% for Resideo Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, POWL leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FIEE or POWL or HUBB or REZI or ETN?
Powell Industries, Inc.
(POWL) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus -660. 2% for FiEE, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus -661. 9% for FIEE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETN leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FIEE or POWL or HUBB or REZI or ETN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus Eaton Corporation plc's 1. 23x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 56. 4x for Powell Industries, Inc. — 43. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUBB: 10. 7% to $545. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — FIEE or POWL or HUBB or REZI or ETN?
In this comparison, HUBB (1.
1% yield), ETN (1. 0% yield), REZI (0. 6% yield), POWL (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. FIEE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FIEE or POWL or HUBB or REZI or ETN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
0% yield, +614. 3% 10Y return). FiEE, Inc. (FIEE) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETN: +614. 3%, FIEE: -88. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FIEE and POWL and HUBB and REZI and ETN?
These companies operate in different sectors (FIEE (Technology) and POWL (Industrials) and HUBB (Industrials) and REZI (Industrials) and ETN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
HUBB, REZI, ETN pay a dividend while FIEE, POWL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.