Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FIX vs MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
FIX vs MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $68.33B | $32.50B | $112.65B | $1.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.14B | $15.28B | $29.99B | $684M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.22B | $459M | $1.12B | $56M |
| Gross Margin | 25.1% | 12.1% | 13.6% | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | 5.6% | 5.8% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 46.1x | 48.6x | 57.4x | 18.1x |
| Total Debt | $786M | $2.80B | $1.19B | $69M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $982M | $396M | $440M | $66M |
FIX vs MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comfort Systems USA… (FIX) | 100 | 5248.6 | +5148.6% |
| MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) | 100 | 1053.1 | +953.1% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 2032.8 | +1932.8% |
| Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FIX vs MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 2.19, yield 0.1%
- Rev growth 29.5%, EPS growth 97.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.0%
- 61.6% 10Y total return vs PWR's 31.4%
- PEG 0.96 vs MTZ's 16.37
MTZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 1.30, yield 0.1%, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 1.30 vs FIX's 2.19, lower leverage
WLDN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (18.1x vs 57.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.5% revenue growth vs MTZ's 16.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 57.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs MTZ's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs FIX's 2.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +349.9% vs WLDN's +85.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.2% ROA vs MTZ's 4.7%, ROIC 53.0% vs 8.9% |
FIX vs MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FIX vs MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIX leads in 4 of 6 categories
WLDN leads 1 • MTZ leads 0 • PWR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 43.8x WLDN's $684M. FIX is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MTZ's 3.0%. On growth, FIX holds the edge at +56.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.1B | $15.3B | $30.0B | $684M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | $1.2B | $2.4B | $64M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.2B | $459M | $1.1B | $56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $179M | $1.7B | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +12.1% | +13.6% | +38.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +5.6% | +5.8% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +3.0% | +3.7% | +8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +1.2% | +5.6% | +6.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.5% | +34.5% | +26.3% | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +121.3% | +4.9% | +51.0% | +71.9% |
Valuation Metrics
WLDN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.3x trailing earnings, WLDN trades at a 81% valuation discount to PWR's 110.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FIX offers better value at 1.41x vs MTZ's 27.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68.3B | $32.5B | $112.7B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $68.1B | $34.9B | $113.4B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 67.24x | 81.32x | 110.40x | 21.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 46.08x | 48.62x | 57.40x | 18.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.41x | 27.39x | 6.40x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 46.84x | 32.32x | 45.68x | 17.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.51x | 2.27x | 3.97x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 28.08x | 9.73x | 12.61x | 3.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 66.24x | 113.74x | 69.50x | 15.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIX delivers a 51.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $52 in annual profit, vs $13 for PWR. PWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTZ's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTZ scores 8/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +51.7% | +14.2% | +13.0% | +19.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.2% | +4.7% | +4.8% | +11.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +53.0% | +8.9% | +11.8% | +11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +50.7% | +10.2% | +11.3% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.84x | 0.13x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$196M | $2.4B | $748M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $982M | $396M | $440M | $66M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $786M | $2.8B | $1.2B | $69M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 209.68x | 4.37x | 6.27x | 12.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FIX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FIX five years ago would be worth $224,199 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,696 for WLDN. Over the past 12 months, FIX leads with a +349.9% total return vs WLDN's +85.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FIX at 136.1% vs WLDN's 63.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +93.6% | +81.1% | +70.8% | -30.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +349.9% | +183.8% | +132.1% | +85.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1215.9% | +368.2% | +345.2% | +339.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2142.0% | +270.5% | +651.1% | +97.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6164.1% | +1752.9% | +3143.9% | +581.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +136.1% | +67.3% | +64.5% | +63.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FIX and PWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PWR is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIX's 2.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FIX currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs WLDN's 54.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.19x | 1.64x | 1.30x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2018.05 | $441.43 | $788.72 | $137.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $422.53 | $143.93 | $315.45 | $39.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +93.4% | +95.2% | +54.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.3 | 76.5 | 87.0 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 389K | 942K | 1.1M | 345K |
Analyst Outlook
FIX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FIX as "Buy", MTZ as "Buy", PWR as "Buy", WLDN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for WLDN (target: $118) vs -19.9% for MTZ (target: $330). FIX is the only dividend payer here at 0.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1923.20 | $330.25 | $647.23 | $117.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 36 | 35 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 20 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.94 | — | $0.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.2% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
FIX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WLDN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FIX vs MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIX or MTZ or PWR or WLDN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
(FIX) is the stronger pick with 29. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 2% for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) offers the better valuation at 21. 3x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIX or MTZ or PWR or WLDN?
On trailing P/E, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the cheapest at 21. 3x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 110. 4x. On forward P/E, Willdan Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comfort Systems USA, Inc. wins at 0. 96x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIX or MTZ or PWR or WLDN?
Over the past 5 years, Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
(FIX) delivered a total return of +21. 4%, compared to +97. 0% for Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIX returned +61. 6% versus WLDN's +581. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIX or MTZ or PWR or WLDN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Comfort Systems USA, Inc. 's 2. 19β — meaning FIX is approximately 68% more volatile than PWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 84% for MasTec, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FIX or MTZ or PWR or WLDN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
(FIX) is pulling ahead at 29. 5% versus 16. 2% for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MasTec, Inc. grew EPS 146. 1% year-over-year, compared to 12. 8% for Quanta Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIX leads at 30. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FIX or MTZ or PWR or WLDN?
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
(FIX) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 2% net margin versus 2. 8% for MasTec, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIX leads at 14. 4% versus 4. 6% for MTZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLDN leads at 37. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FIX or MTZ or PWR or WLDN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 96x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 39. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WLDN: 57. 8% to $117. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FIX or MTZ or PWR or WLDN?
In this comparison, FIX (0.
1% yield) pays a dividend. MTZ, PWR, WLDN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FIX or MTZ or PWR or WLDN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MasTec, Inc.
(MTZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1753% 10Y return). Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) carries a higher beta of 2. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTZ: +1753%, FIX: +61. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FIX and MTZ and PWR and WLDN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.