FLGC
Flora Growth Corp.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Market Cap$88M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisFLGC
DBVT
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FLGC vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$919M
5Y Perf.-64.1%
FLGC vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  FLGC |  DBVT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $88M | $919M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-120M | $-168M |
| Gross Margin | 43.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -30.7% | — |
| Total Debt | $54M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $194M |
FLGC vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FLGC
DBVT
| Stock | May 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 35.9 | -64.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLGC vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: DBVT leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Flora Growth Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇DBVT emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FLGC
Flora Growth Corp.
The Growth Play
FLGC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -75.6%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -24.3%
- -75.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Income Pick
DBVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.12
- -89.9% 10Y total return vs FLGC's -99.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 3.67x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  FLGC | -75.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins |  DBVT | 0.3% margin vs FLGC's -8.3% |
| Stability / Safety | DBVT | Beta 1.12 vs FLGC's 3.12, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | DBVT | +57.7% vs FLGC's -74.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DBVT | -89.0% ROA vs FLGC's -192.1% |
FLGC vs DBVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
Segment breakdown not available.
FLGC vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLDBVTLAGGINGFLGC
FLGCFlora Growth Corp.
1leads
DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FLGCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FLGC1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
DBVT6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
DBVT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
DBVT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLGC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLGC and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $14M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | FLGCFlora Growth Corp. | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$120M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.3% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -30.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -63.5% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +91.5% |
FLGC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FLGC and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FLGCFlora Growth Corp. | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $88M | $919M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $87M | $747M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.55x | -0.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.49x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.61x | 0.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — FLGC and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DBVT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DBVT delivers a -130.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-130 in annual profit, vs $-3 for FLGC. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLGC's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DBVT scores 4/9 vs FLGC's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | FLGCFlora Growth Corp. | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -192.1% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.9% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $48M | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54M | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.87x | -189.82x |
DBVT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DBVT five years ago would be worth $2,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25 for FLGC. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +57.7% total return vs FLGC's -74.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at -9.0% vs FLGC's -62.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FLGCFlora Growth Corp. | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.3% | -18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -74.3% | +57.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -24.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -74.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -89.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.9% | -9.0% |
DBVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DBVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLGC's 3.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DBVT currently trades 59.3% from its 52-week high vs FLGC's 15.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FLGCFlora Growth Corp. | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.12x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.00 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.86 | $8.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.3% | +59.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 37.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 225K |
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FLGCFlora Growth Corp. | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
DBVT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FLGC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
Best OverallDBV Technologies S.A. (DBVT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FLGC vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLGC or DBVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLGC or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) delivered a total return of -74. 4%, compared to -99. 8% for Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DBVT returned -89. 9% versus FLGC's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLGC or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Flora Growth Corp. 's 3. 12β — meaning FLGC is approximately 179% more volatile than DBVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 76% for Flora Growth Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FLGC or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flora Growth Corp.
grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FLGC or DBVT?
DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -30. 5% for Flora Growth Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DBVT leads at 0. 0% versus -30. 7% for FLGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLGC leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FLGC or DBVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FLGC or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12)). Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DBVT: -89. 9%, FLGC: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FLGC and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.