Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FLNG vs SHEL vs BP vs LNG vs KMI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
FLNG vs SHEL vs BP vs LNG vs KMI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.77B | $241.02B | $113.13B | $50.46B | $69.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $266.82B | $194.60B | $21.06B | $17.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $75M | $18.71B | $3.20B | $1.48B | $3.31B |
| Gross Margin | 52.9% | 15.6% | 19.3% | 36.2% | 46.9% |
| Operating Margin | 50.6% | 10.2% | 10.7% | 30.5% | 28.6% |
| Forward P/E | 18.8x | 8.6x | 8.4x | 15.7x | 21.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.85B | $104.58B | $84.27B | $28.61B | $32.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $448M | $30.22B | $36.56B | $1.58B | $109M |
FLNG vs SHEL vs BP vs LNG vs KMI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) | 100 | 711.3 | +611.3% |
| Shell plc (SHEL) | 100 | 262.8 | +162.8% |
| BP p.l.c. (BP) | 100 | 187.3 | +87.3% |
| Cheniere Energy, In… (LNG) | 100 | 541.4 | +441.4% |
| Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) | 100 | 198.8 | +98.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLNG vs SHEL vs BP vs LNG vs KMI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLNG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.
- Beta 0.12, yield 9.2%, current ratio 3.03x
- 21.5% margin vs BP's 1.6%
- 9.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KMI's 3.7%
SHEL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 4.9% ROA vs BP's 1.1%, ROIC 8.8% vs 9.8%
BP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 15.7x)
- +58.5% vs LNG's +2.1%
LNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 24.4%, EPS growth 69.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -16.5%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs FLNG's 243.9%
- 24.4% revenue growth vs SHEL's -6.1%
KMI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 3.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 99.8%, current ratio 0.64x
- PEG 0.23 vs FLNG's 0.34
- Beta 0.07 vs SHEL's 0.14
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.4% revenue growth vs SHEL's -6.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 15.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.5% margin vs BP's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs SHEL's 0.14 | |
| Dividends | 9.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KMI's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.5% vs LNG's +2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs BP's 1.1%, ROIC 8.8% vs 9.8% |
FLNG vs SHEL vs BP vs LNG vs KMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FLNG vs SHEL vs BP vs LNG vs KMI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLNG leads in 1 of 6 categories
BP leads 1 • LNG leads 1 • SHEL leads 0 • KMI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHEL is the larger business by revenue, generating $266.8B annually — 767.5x FLNG's $348M. FLNG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BP's 1.6%. On growth, LNG holds the edge at +24.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $266.8B | $194.6B | $21.1B | $17.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $252M | $50.1B | $38.8B | $7.8B | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $75M | $18.7B | $3.2B | $1.5B | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $133M | $18.8B | $11.4B | $4.5B | $3.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | +15.6% | +19.3% | +36.2% | +46.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +50.6% | +10.2% | +10.7% | +30.5% | +28.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +7.0% | +1.6% | +7.0% | +18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.4% | +7.0% | +5.9% | +21.5% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | +0.5% | +11.2% | +24.8% | +13.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -52.4% | +33.3% | +4.5% | -11.6% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, LNG trades at a 100% valuation discount to BP's 2124.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KMI offers better value at 0.24x vs FLNG's 0.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $241.0B | $113.1B | $50.5B | $69.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $315.4B | $160.8B | $77.5B | $102.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.71x | 13.95x | 2124.51x | 9.95x | 22.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.80x | 8.63x | 8.36x | 15.66x | 21.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.42x | — | — | — | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.56x | 6.34x | 4.78x | 10.68x | 14.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.09x | 0.90x | 0.60x | 2.57x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.46x | 1.42x | 1.55x | 4.04x | 2.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.12x | 11.05x | 10.01x | 20.50x | 21.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNG delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $4 for BP. SHEL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNG's 2.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMI scores 8/9 vs FLNG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.4% | +10.5% | +4.2% | +13.3% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +4.9% | +1.1% | +3.2% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +8.8% | +9.8% | +10.9% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.1% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +12.5% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.57x | 0.60x | 1.14x | 2.19x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $74.4B | $47.7B | $27.0B | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $448M | $30.2B | $36.6B | $1.6B | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $104.6B | $84.3B | $28.6B | $32.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.81x | 6.83x | 3.55x | 10.46x | 2.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FLNG and KMI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLNG five years ago would be worth $39,387 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,272 for BP. Over the past 12 months, BP leads with a +58.5% total return vs LNG's +2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KMI at 27.3% vs FLNG's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.7% | +12.3% | +22.4% | +21.7% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.4% | +33.4% | +58.5% | +2.1% | +20.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.0% | +51.5% | +32.0% | +64.3% | +106.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +293.9% | +140.0% | +92.7% | +203.5% | +103.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +243.9% | +126.6% | +100.3% | +670.9% | +141.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.9% | +14.9% | +9.7% | +18.0% | +27.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLNG and LNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNG is the less volatile stock with a -0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHEL's 0.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLNG currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs LNG's 79.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.12x | 0.14x | -0.07x | -0.39x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.40 | $94.90 | $48.27 | $300.89 | $34.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.72 | $64.89 | $28.13 | $186.70 | $25.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +88.5% | +89.8% | +79.8% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 35.8 | 40.2 | 37.5 | 41.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 611K | 8.1M | 15.1M | 3.3M | 12.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FLNG and KMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLNG as "Hold", SHEL as "Buy", BP as "Hold", LNG as "Buy", KMI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.8% upside for SHEL (target: $95) vs -26.7% for FLNG (target: $24). For income investors, FLNG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.17% vs LNG's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $94.67 | $43.89 | $264.00 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 12 | 44 | 27 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.2% | +3.4% | +4.4% | +0.9% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.00 | $2.85 | $1.91 | $2.05 | $1.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.3% | +4.0% | +5.4% | 0.0% |
FLNG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
FLNG vs SHEL vs BP vs LNG vs KMI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLNG or SHEL or BP or LNG or KMI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the stronger pick with 24. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 1% for Shell plc (SHEL). Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shell plc (SHEL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLNG or SHEL or BP or LNG or KMI?
On trailing P/E, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus BP p. l. c. at 2124. 5x. On forward P/E, BP p. l. c. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Kinder Morgan, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. 's 0. 34x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLNG or SHEL or BP or LNG or KMI?
Over the past 5 years, FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) delivered a total return of +293. 9%, compared to +92. 7% for BP p. l. c. (BP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNG returned +670. 9% versus BP's +100. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLNG or SHEL or BP or LNG or KMI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 39β versus Shell plc's 0. 14β — meaning SHEL is approximately -136% more volatile than LNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shell plc (SHEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 3% for FLEX LNG Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLNG or SHEL or BP or LNG or KMI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is pulling ahead at 24. 4% versus -6. 1% for Shell plc (SHEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cheniere Energy, Inc. grew EPS 69. 9% year-over-year, compared to -85. 4% for BP p. l. c.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLNG leads at -0. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLNG or SHEL or BP or LNG or KMI?
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 1% net margin versus 0. 0% for BP p. l. c. — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLNG leads at 50. 6% versus 8. 2% for BP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLNG leads at 52. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLNG or SHEL or BP or LNG or KMI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. 's 0. 34x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, BP p. l. c. (BP) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for Kinder Morgan, Inc. — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEL: 12. 8% to $94. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLNG or SHEL or BP or LNG or KMI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) offers the highest yield at 9. 2%, versus 0. 9% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).
09Is FLNG or SHEL or BP or LNG or KMI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 39), 0. 9% yield, +670. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNG: +670. 9%, SHEL: +126. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLNG and SHEL and BP and LNG and KMI?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLNG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SHEL is a large-cap deep-value stock; BP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; LNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KMI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.