Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FLR vs J
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
FLR vs J — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $8.24B | $14.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.50B | $13.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-350M | $254M |
| Gross Margin | -0.8% | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | 19.7x | 17.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.07B | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.13B | $1.24B |
Quick Verdict: FLR vs J
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 10.7% 10Y total return vs J's -10.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.90, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.91x
- +54.4% vs J's -15.0%
J carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.22, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth -62.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- Beta 1.22, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.30x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% revenue growth vs FLR's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.8x vs 19.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs FLR's -2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs FLR's 1.90 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.4% vs J's -15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.2% ROA vs FLR's -4.2%, ROIC 9.9% vs -12.7% |
FLR vs J — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLR vs J — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
J leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLR and J operate at a comparable scale, with $15.5B and $13.2B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.9% (J) to -2.3% (FLR). On growth, J holds the edge at +27.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.5B | $13.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$310M | $797M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$350M | $254M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$437M | $484M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | +23.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +27.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -182.1% | -27.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FLR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.2B | $14.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $16.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -27.24x | 53.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.68x | 17.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 1.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.91x | 3.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
J leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
J delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-11 for FLR. FLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to J's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), J scores 7/9 vs FLR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.7% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.2% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.7% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.9% | +11.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.45x | 11.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLR five years ago would be worth $22,231 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,752 for J. Over the past 12 months, FLR leads with a +54.4% total return vs J's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLR at 25.8% vs J's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.0% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.4% | -15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.0% | -13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.3% | -12.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | -10.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.8% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLR and J each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
J is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLR's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLR currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs J's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.90x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.50 | $154.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.28 | $119.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.3% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 66.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 788K |
Analyst Outlook
J leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FLR as "Buy" and J as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.3% upside for J (target: $155) vs 3.3% for FLR (target: $56). J is the only dividend payer here at 1.01% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $56.00 | $154.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.1% | +5.1% |
J leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FLR vs J: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLR or J a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jacobs Solutions Inc.
(J) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Fluor Corporation (FLR). Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) offers the better valuation at 53. 2x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fluor Corporation (FLR) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLR or J?
On forward P/E, Jacobs Solutions Inc.
is actually cheaper at 17. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLR or J?
Over the past 5 years, Fluor Corporation (FLR) delivered a total return of +122.
3%, compared to -12. 5% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLR returned +10. 7% versus J's -10. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLR or J?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jacobs Solutions Inc.
(J) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Fluor Corporation's 1. 90β — meaning FLR is approximately 56% more volatile than J relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fluor Corporation (FLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 58% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLR or J?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jacobs Solutions Inc.
(J) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -5. 0% for Fluor Corporation (FLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jacobs Solutions Inc. grew EPS -62. 3% year-over-year, compared to -116. 2% for Fluor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, J leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLR or J?
Jacobs Solutions Inc.
(J) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 4% net margin versus -2. 3% for Fluor Corporation — meaning it keeps 2. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: J leads at 7. 2% versus -2. 4% for FLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — J leads at 24. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLR or J more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Jacobs Solutions Inc.
(J) trades at 17. 8x forward P/E versus 19. 7x for Fluor Corporation — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for J: 22. 3% to $154. 86.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLR or J?
In this comparison, J (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. FLR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FLR or J better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jacobs Solutions Inc.
(J) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), 1. 0% yield). Fluor Corporation (FLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (J: -10. 8%, FLR: +10. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLR and J?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
J pays a dividend while FLR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.