Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FLR vs J

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FLR
Fluor Corporation

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.24B
5Y Perf.+17.3%
J
Jacobs Solutions Inc.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$14.87B
5Y Perf.-3.4%

FLR vs J — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FLR logoFLR
J logoJ
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionEngineering & Construction
Market Cap$8.24B$14.87B
Revenue (TTM)$15.50B$13.17B
Net Income (TTM)$-350M$254M
Gross Margin-0.8%23.4%
Operating Margin-2.4%4.7%
Forward P/E19.7x17.8x
Total Debt$1.07B$2.71B
Cash & Equiv.$2.13B$1.24B

Quick Verdict: FLR vs J

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: J leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Fluor Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FLR
Fluor Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

FLR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 10.7% 10Y total return vs J's -10.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.90, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.91x
  • +54.4% vs J's -15.0%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
J
Jacobs Solutions Inc.
The Income Pick

J carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.22, yield 1.0%
  • Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth -62.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
  • Beta 1.22, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.30x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJ logoJ4.6% revenue growth vs FLR's -5.0%
ValueJ logoJLower P/E (17.8x vs 19.7x)
Quality / MarginsJ logoJ1.9% margin vs FLR's -2.3%
Stability / SafetyJ logoJBeta 1.22 vs FLR's 1.90
DividendsJ logoJ1.0% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FLR logoFLR+54.4% vs J's -15.0%
Efficiency (ROA)J logoJ2.2% ROA vs FLR's -4.2%, ROIC 9.9% vs -12.7%

FLR vs J — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FLRFluor Corporation
FY 2025
Urban Solutions Segment
72.0%$9.2B
Energy Solutions Segment
27.8%$3.6B
Other Operating Segment
0.2%$29M
JJacobs Solutions Inc.
FY 2025
Infrastructure & Advanced Facilities
89.5%$10.8B
PA Consulting
10.5%$1.3B

FLR vs J — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJLAGGINGFLR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

J leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

FLR and J operate at a comparable scale, with $15.5B and $13.2B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.9% (J) to -2.3% (FLR). On growth, J holds the edge at +27.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFLR logoFLRFluor CorporationJ logoJJacobs Solutions …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15.5B$13.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$310M$797M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$350M$254M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$437M$484M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-0.8%+23.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.4%+4.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.3%+1.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.8%+3.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.0%+27.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-182.1%-27.5%
J leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FLR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricFLR logoFLRFluor CorporationJ logoJJacobs Solutions …
Market CapShares × price$8.2B$14.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7.2B$16.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-27.24x53.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.68x17.78x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.84x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.53x1.24x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.91x3.26x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF24.48x
FLR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

J leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

J delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-11 for FLR. FLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to J's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), J scores 7/9 vs FLR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFLR logoFLRFluor CorporationJ logoJJacobs Solutions …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-10.7%+5.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-4.2%+2.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-12.7%+9.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.9%+11.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–927
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.33x0.58x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1.1B$1.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.1B$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.1B$2.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-7.45x11.40x
J leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FLR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FLR five years ago would be worth $22,231 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,752 for J. Over the past 12 months, FLR leads with a +54.4% total return vs J's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLR at 25.8% vs J's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFLR logoFLRFluor CorporationJ logoJJacobs Solutions …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+30.0%-6.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+54.4%-15.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+99.0%-13.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+122.3%-12.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+10.7%-10.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+25.8%-4.8%
FLR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLR and J each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

J is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLR's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLR currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs J's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFLR logoFLRFluor CorporationJ logoJJacobs Solutions …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.90x1.22x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$57.50$154.72
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$34.28$119.22
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.3%+81.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.166.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.2M788K
Evenly matched — FLR and J each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

J leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates FLR as "Buy" and J as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.3% upside for J (target: $155) vs 3.3% for FLR (target: $56). J is the only dividend payer here at 1.01% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFLR logoFLRFluor CorporationJ logoJJacobs Solutions …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$56.00$154.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts2838
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.27
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+9.1%+5.1%
J leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

J leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallJacobs Solutions Inc. (J)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FLR vs J: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FLR or J a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Jacobs Solutions Inc.

(J) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Fluor Corporation (FLR). Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) offers the better valuation at 53. 2x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fluor Corporation (FLR) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FLR or J?

On forward P/E, Jacobs Solutions Inc.

is actually cheaper at 17. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FLR or J?

Over the past 5 years, Fluor Corporation (FLR) delivered a total return of +122.

3%, compared to -12. 5% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLR returned +10. 7% versus J's -10. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FLR or J?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jacobs Solutions Inc.

(J) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Fluor Corporation's 1. 90β — meaning FLR is approximately 56% more volatile than J relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fluor Corporation (FLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 58% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FLR or J?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jacobs Solutions Inc.

(J) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -5. 0% for Fluor Corporation (FLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jacobs Solutions Inc. grew EPS -62. 3% year-over-year, compared to -116. 2% for Fluor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, J leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FLR or J?

Jacobs Solutions Inc.

(J) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 4% net margin versus -2. 3% for Fluor Corporation — meaning it keeps 2. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: J leads at 7. 2% versus -2. 4% for FLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — J leads at 24. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FLR or J more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Jacobs Solutions Inc.

(J) trades at 17. 8x forward P/E versus 19. 7x for Fluor Corporation — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for J: 22. 3% to $154. 86.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FLR or J?

In this comparison, J (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. FLR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FLR or J better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Jacobs Solutions Inc.

(J) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), 1. 0% yield). Fluor Corporation (FLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (J: -10. 8%, FLR: +10. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FLR and J?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

J pays a dividend while FLR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FLR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

J

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FLR and J on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FLR: -2.0% · J: 27.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.