Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FLS vs SPIR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FLS
Flowserve Corporation

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.38B
5Y Perf.+115.3%
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$601.52B
5Y Perf.-76.8%

FLS vs SPIR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FLS logoFLS
SPIR logoSPIR
IndustryIndustrial - MachinerySpecialty Business Services
Market Cap$9.38B$601.52B
Revenue (TTM)$4.65B$72M
Net Income (TTM)$354M$-25.02B
Gross Margin35.5%40.8%
Operating Margin12.6%-121.4%
Forward P/E17.9x11.4x
Total Debt$1.91B$8.76B
Cash & Equiv.$760M$24.81B

FLS vs SPIRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FLS
SPIR
StockNov 20May 26Return
Flowserve Corporati… (FLS)100215.3+115.3%
Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR)10023.2-76.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FLS vs SPIR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FLS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Spire Global, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FLS
Flowserve Corporation
The Income Pick

FLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 1.1%
  • Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 23.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
  • 75.8% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -75.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
The Value Play

SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.

  • Lower P/E (11.4x vs 17.9x)
  • +93.2% vs FLS's +59.2%
Best for: value and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFLS logoFLS3.8% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
ValueSPIR logoSPIRLower P/E (11.4x vs 17.9x)
Quality / MarginsFLS logoFLS7.6% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
Stability / SafetyFLS logoFLSBeta 1.69 vs SPIR's 2.93
DividendsFLS logoFLS1.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SPIR logoSPIR+93.2% vs FLS's +59.2%
Efficiency (ROA)FLS logoFLS6.2% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 14.2% vs -0.1%

FLS vs SPIR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FLSFlowserve Corporation
FY 2025
Aftermarket Equipment
53.1%$2.5B
Original Equipment
46.9%$2.2B
SPIRSpire Global, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FLS vs SPIR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFLSLAGGINGSPIR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 65.0x SPIR's $72M. FLS is the more profitable business, keeping 7.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, FLS holds the edge at -6.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFLS logoFLSFlowserve Corpora…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.7B$72M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$683M-$74M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$354M-$25.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$437M-$16.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.5%+40.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.6%-121.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.6%-349.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.4%-227.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.7%-26.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.3%+59.5%
FLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FLS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

At 11.4x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 59% valuation discount to FLS's 27.8x P/E.

MetricFLS logoFLSFlowserve Corpora…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$9.4B$601.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$10.5B$585.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS27.80x11.37x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.92x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.30x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.84x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.98x8406.65x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.26x5.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.56x
FLS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FLS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

FLS delivers a 15.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLS's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLS scores 7/9 vs SPIR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFLS logoFLSFlowserve Corpora…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+15.5%-88.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.2%-47.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.2%-0.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.9%-0.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.85x0.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.1B-$16.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$760M$24.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.9B$8.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.45x9.20x
FLS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SPIR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FLS five years ago would be worth $18,321 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,311 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, SPIR leads with a +93.2% total return vs FLS's +59.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPIR at 50.1% vs FLS's 28.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFLS logoFLSFlowserve Corpora…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.0%+134.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+59.2%+93.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+111.3%+238.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+83.2%-76.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+75.8%-75.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+28.3%+50.1%
SPIR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FLS is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricFLS logoFLSFlowserve Corpora…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.69x2.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$92.41$23.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$45.11$6.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+79.4%+77.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.448.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.1M1.6M
FLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates FLS as "Hold" and SPIR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.1% upside for FLS (target: $90) vs -5.7% for SPIR (target: $17). FLS is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFLS logoFLSFlowserve Corpora…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$89.57$17.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts3112
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.84
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.7%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

FLS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SPIR leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallFlowserve Corporation (FLS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FLS vs SPIR: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FLS or SPIR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Flowserve Corporation (FLS) is the stronger pick with 3.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FLS or SPIR?

On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the cheapest at 11. 4x versus Flowserve Corporation at 27. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FLS or SPIR?

Over the past 5 years, Flowserve Corporation (FLS) delivered a total return of +83.

2%, compared to -76. 9% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLS returned +75. 8% versus SPIR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FLS or SPIR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flowserve Corporation (FLS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

69β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 74% more volatile than FLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 85% for Flowserve Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FLS or SPIR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flowserve Corporation (FLS) is pulling ahead at 3.

8% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 23. 4% for Flowserve Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLS leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FLS or SPIR?

Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus 7. 3% for Flowserve Corporation — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLS leads at 13. 0% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPIR leads at 40. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FLS or SPIR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLS: 22.

1% to $89. 57.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FLS or SPIR?

In this comparison, FLS (1.

1% yield) pays a dividend. SPIR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FLS or SPIR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Flowserve Corporation (FLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

1% yield). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLS: +75. 8%, SPIR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FLS and SPIR?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock. FLS pays a dividend while SPIR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FLS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPIR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FLS and SPIR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FLS: -6.7% · SPIR: -26.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FLS: 27.8x · SPIR: 11.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.