Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FLYX vs ACHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
FLYX vs ACHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $187M | $4.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $376M | $300K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $-618M |
| Gross Margin | 12.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -12.4% | -2431.0% |
| Total Debt | $243M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $1.02B |
FLYX vs ACHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| flyExclusive, Inc. (FLYX) | 100 | 42.2 | -57.8% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 102.3 | +2.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLYX vs ACHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLYX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.43, yield 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.43, current ratio 0.28x
- Beta 2.43, yield 1.6%, current ratio 0.28x
ACHR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 30.3%
- -37.0% 10Y total return vs FLYX's -57.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -4.7% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.43 vs ACHR's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -22.4% vs ACHR's -26.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.9% ROA vs ACHR's -32.9%, ROIC -18.6% vs -89.6% |
FLYX vs ACHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FLYX vs ACHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYX leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYX is the larger business by revenue, generating $376M annually — 1252.9x ACHR's $300,000. FLYX is the more profitable business, keeping -4.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $376M | $300,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | -$709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | -$618M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$32M | -$512M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.4% | -2431.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | -2060.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.5% | -1705.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | +43.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FLYX and ACHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $187M | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $401M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.30x | -6.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.50x | 9999.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLYX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -37.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | -32.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.6% | -89.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -24.1% | -44.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $214M | -$979M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $243M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.54x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACHR five years ago would be worth $6,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,218 for FLYX. Over the past 12 months, FLYX leads with a -22.4% total return vs ACHR's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACHR at 43.2% vs FLYX's -25.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.3% | -22.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.4% | -26.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.8% | +193.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.8% | -36.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.8% | -37.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.0% | +43.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYX and ACHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLYX is the less volatile stock with a 2.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACHR's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACHR currently trades 43.0% from its 52-week high vs FLYX's 26.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.43x | 2.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.88 | $14.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.88 | $4.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.1% | +43.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 905K | 27.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FLYX as "Hold" and ACHR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 201.7% upside for FLYX (target: $7) vs 96.3% for ACHR (target: $12). FLYX is the only dividend payer here at 1.58% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $12.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FLYX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACHR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FLYX vs ACHR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLYX or ACHR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Archer Aviation Inc.
(ACHR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLYX or ACHR?
Over the past 5 years, Archer Aviation Inc.
(ACHR) delivered a total return of -36. 3%, compared to -57. 8% for flyExclusive, Inc. (FLYX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACHR returned -37. 0% versus FLYX's -57. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLYX or ACHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), flyExclusive, Inc.
(FLYX) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 43β versus Archer Aviation Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning ACHR is approximately 22% more volatile than FLYX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FLYX or ACHR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Archer Aviation Inc.
grew EPS 30. 3% year-over-year, compared to 5. 6% for flyExclusive, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FLYX or ACHR?
flyExclusive, Inc.
(FLYX) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 7% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLYX leads at -13. 3% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLYX leads at 8. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FLYX or ACHR?
In this comparison, FLYX (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ACHR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is FLYX or ACHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, flyExclusive, Inc.
(FLYX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 6% yield). Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLYX: -57. 8%, ACHR: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FLYX and ACHR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
FLYX pays a dividend while ACHR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.