FMSTW
Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd.
Chemicals
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.+3.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FMSTW vs SQM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$13.08B
5Y Perf.+46.4%
FMSTW vs SQM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FMSTW | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $6M | $13.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $4.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $524M |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $521K | $4.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $1.38B |
FMSTW vs SQM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FMSTW
SQM
| Stock | Aug 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foremost Lithium Re… (FMSTW) | 100 | 103.8 | +3.8% |
| Sociedad Química y … (SQM) | 100 | 146.4 | +46.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMSTW vs SQM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FMSTW and SQM are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FMSTW
Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd.
The Income Pick
FMSTW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.66
- EPS growth 51.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 2.1%, current ratio 1.73x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
The Long-Run Compounder
SQM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 464.6% 10Y total return vs FMSTW's 21.4%
- 12.1% margin vs FMSTW's -1.0%
- 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FMSTW | 85.1% revenue growth vs SQM's -39.4% |
| Quality / Margins | SQM | 12.1% margin vs FMSTW's -1.0% |
| Stability / Safety | FMSTW | Beta 0.66 vs SQM's 1.24, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SQM | 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FMSTW | +353.7% vs SQM's +173.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SQM | 4.5% ROA vs FMSTW's -9.8%, ROIC 9.0% vs -26.2% |
FMSTW vs SQM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FMSTW vs SQM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSQMLAGGINGFMSTW
FMSTWForemost Lithium Reso…
0leads
SQMSociedad Química y Mi…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FMSTWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SQM1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SQM6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SQM5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SQM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SQM and FMSTW operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | FMSTWForemost Lithium … | SQMSociedad Química … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $917M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $524M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +27.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +21.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.0% | +34.8% |
SQM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FMSTW and SQM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FMSTWForemost Lithium … | SQMSociedad Química … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $13.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $16.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.15x | -64.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.32x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.19x |
Evenly matched — FMSTW and SQM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SQM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SQM delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-11 for FMSTW. FMSTW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SQM's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SQM scores 4/9 vs FMSTW's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | FMSTWForemost Lithium … | SQMSociedad Química … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.8% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -26.2% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -30.2% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $521,368 | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -71.80x | 5.37x |
SQM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SQM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SQM five years ago would be worth $19,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,143 for FMSTW. Over the past 12 months, FMSTW leads with a +353.7% total return vs SQM's +173.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SQM at 12.0% vs FMSTW's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FMSTWForemost Lithium … | SQMSociedad Química … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.4% | +31.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +353.7% | +173.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.4% | +40.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.4% | +94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.4% | +464.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +12.0% |
SQM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FMSTW and SQM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FMSTW is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SQM's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SQM currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs FMSTW's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FMSTWForemost Lithium … | SQMSociedad Química … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.47 | $98.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.11 | $29.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.5% | +93.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 1.3M |
Evenly matched — FMSTW and SQM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
SQM is the only dividend payer here at 0.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FMSTWForemost Lithium … | SQMSociedad Química … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $75.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
SQM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallSociedad Química y Minera d… (SQM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FMSTW vs SQM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMSTW or SQM a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. (SQM) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FMSTW or SQM?
Over the past 5 years, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. (SQM) delivered a total return of +94. 2%, compared to +21. 4% for Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. (FMSTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SQM returned +464. 6% versus FMSTW's +21. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FMSTW or SQM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd.
(FMSTW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. 's 1. 24β — meaning SQM is approximately 88% more volatile than FMSTW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. (FMSTW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 93% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FMSTW or SQM?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd.
grew EPS 51. 5% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FMSTW or SQM?
Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd.
(FMSTW) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -8. 9% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SQM leads at 23. 5% versus 0. 0% for FMSTW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SQM leads at 29. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FMSTW or SQM?
In this comparison, SQM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. FMSTW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is FMSTW or SQM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd.
(FMSTW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FMSTW: +21. 4%, SQM: +464. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FMSTW and SQM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.