Home Improvement
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FND vs TILE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
FND vs TILE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Home Improvement | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $5.22B | $1.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.68B | $1.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $199M | $116M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 24.4x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.63B | $265M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $249M | $71M |
FND vs TILE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 100 | 92.9 | -7.1% |
| Interface, Inc. (TILE) | 100 | 321.6 | +221.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FND vs TILE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FND is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.80
TILE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 32.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.2%
- 75.4% 10Y total return vs FND's 50.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 21.9%, current ratio 2.34x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs FND's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 24.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs FND's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs FND's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.0% vs FND's -34.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs FND's 3.9%, ROIC 11.3% vs 4.4% |
FND vs TILE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FND vs TILE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TILE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FND is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 3.4x TILE's $1.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.4% (TILE) to 4.3% (FND). On growth, TILE holds the edge at +4.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $443M | $206M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $199M | $116M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $105M | $122M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | +4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.8% | +10.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TILE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.9x trailing earnings, TILE trades at a 45% valuation discount to FND's 25.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TILE's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FND's 16.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.2B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.6B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.16x | 13.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.45x | 12.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 28.60x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.72x | 8.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.11x | 1.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.17x | 1.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 81.49x | 12.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TILE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TILE delivers a 9.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for FND. TILE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FND's 1.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TILE scores 6/9 vs FND's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +13.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.51x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $249M | $71M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.6B | $265M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.72x | 8.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TILE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TILE five years ago would be worth $21,071 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,291 for FND. Over the past 12 months, TILE leads with a +43.0% total return vs FND's -34.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TILE at 54.4% vs FND's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.3% | -3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.7% | +43.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.8% | +268.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.1% | +110.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.7% | +75.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.5% | +54.4% |
Risk & Volatility
TILE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TILE is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FND's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TILE currently trades 77.8% from its 52-week high vs FND's 52.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $92.41 | $35.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.47 | $18.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.3% | +77.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.1 | 43.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 579K |
Analyst Outlook
FND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FND as "Hold" and TILE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.9% upside for TILE (target: $36) vs 30.8% for FND (target: $63). TILE is the only dividend payer here at 0.22% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.18 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% |
TILE leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FND leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
FND vs TILE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FND or TILE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Interface, Inc.
(TILE) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND). Interface, Inc. (TILE) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Interface, Inc. (TILE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FND or TILE?
On trailing P/E, Interface, Inc.
(TILE) is the cheapest at 13. 9x versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. at 25. 2x. On forward P/E, Interface, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FND or TILE?
Over the past 5 years, Interface, Inc.
(TILE) delivered a total return of +110. 7%, compared to -57. 1% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TILE returned +75. 4% versus FND's +50. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FND or TILE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Interface, Inc.
(TILE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning FND is approximately 80% more volatile than TILE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interface, Inc. (TILE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 151% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FND or TILE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Interface, Inc.
(TILE) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus 5. 1% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Interface, Inc. grew EPS 32. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 1% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FND leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FND or TILE?
Interface, Inc.
(TILE) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 4. 5% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TILE leads at 11. 8% versus 5. 9% for FND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FND leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FND or TILE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Interface, Inc.
(TILE) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 4x for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TILE: 31. 9% to $36. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FND or TILE?
In this comparison, TILE (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. FND does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FND or TILE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Interface, Inc.
(TILE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00)). Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TILE: +75. 4%, FND: +50. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FND and TILE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TILE is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.