Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FNWD logo
FNWD
FHN logo
FHN
FIS logo
FIS
JKHY logo
JKHY
FISV logo
FISV
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FNWD vs FHN vs FIS vs JKHY vs FISV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FNWD
Finward Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$147M
5Y Perf.+3.6%
FHN
First Horizon Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.47B
5Y Perf.+152.4%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-44.9%
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.28B
5Y Perf.-30.3%
FISV
Fiserv, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$28.76B
5Y Perf.-13.2%

FNWD vs FHN vs FIS vs JKHY vs FISV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FNWD logoFNWD
FHN logoFHN
FIS logoFIS
JKHY logoJKHY
FISV logoFISV
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$147M$12.47B$20.26B$9.28B$28.76B
Revenue (TTM)$101M$4.91B$11.66B$2.52B$21.09B
Net Income (TTM)$8M$982M$2.67B$519M$3.20B
Gross Margin65.6%66.8%37.6%44.1%60.8%
Operating Margin8.0%26.1%17.9%26.0%24.4%
Forward P/E12.8x11.7x6.2x18.7x6.6x
Total Debt$85M$4.57B$4.01B$0.00$29.12B
Cash & Equiv.$18M$961M$599M$102M$798M

FNWD vs FHN vs FIS vs JKHY vs FISVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FNWD
FHN
FIS
JKHY
FISV
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Finward Bancorp (FNWD)100103.6+3.6%
First Horizon Corpo… (FHN)100252.4+152.4%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY)10069.7-30.3%
Fiserv, Inc. (FISV)10055.1-44.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FNWD vs FHN vs FIS vs JKHY vs FISV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JKHY leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. FHN and FISV also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JKHY emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FNWD
Finward Bancorp
The Banking Pick

FNWD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 48.5%, current ratio 1.77x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
FHN
First Horizon Corporation
The Banking Pick

FHN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 123.8% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 74.8%
  • NIM 3.1% vs FNWD's 2.8%
  • +30.9% vs FISV's -68.0%
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • 22.9% margin vs FNWD's 8.0%
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
The Growth Play

JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
  • Beta 0.10, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.27x
  • 7.2% revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6%
  • Beta 0.10 vs FHN's 0.97
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
FISV
Fiserv, Inc.
The Value Pick

FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.19 vs JKHY's 1.86
  • Lower P/E (6.6x vs 18.7x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.86
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJKHY logoJKHY7.2% revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6%
ValueFISV logoFISVLower P/E (6.6x vs 18.7x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.86
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs FNWD's 8.0%
Stability / SafetyJKHY logoJKHYBeta 0.10 vs FHN's 0.97
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FHN logoFHN+30.9% vs FISV's -68.0%
Efficiency (ROA)JKHY logoJKHY17.0% ROA vs FNWD's 0.4%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.4%

FNWD vs FHN vs FIS vs JKHY vs FISV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FNWDFinward Bancorp

Segment breakdown not available.

FHNFirst Horizon Corporation
FY 2025
Underwriting, Portfolio Advisory, and Other Noninterest Income
100.0%$40M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
JKHYJack Henry & Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Payments
38.2%$873M
Core Segment
32.3%$739M
Complementary
29.5%$675M
FISVFiserv, Inc.
FY 2024
Processing And Services
81.3%$16.6B
Product
18.7%$3.8B

FNWD vs FHN vs FIS vs JKHY vs FISV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFHNLAGGINGFNWD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 208.7x FNWD's $101M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FNWD's 8.0%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFHN logoFHNFirst Horizon Cor…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$101M$4.9B$11.7B$2.5B$21.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$13M$1.3B$4.1B$810M$7.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$8M$982M$2.7B$519M$3.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$963M$2.8B$728M$4.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+65.6%+66.8%+37.6%+44.1%+60.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.0%+26.1%+17.9%+26.0%+24.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.0%+20.0%+22.9%+20.6%+15.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.6%+19.6%+23.9%+28.9%+19.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%+8.7%-2.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.1%+79.3%+30.6%+12.5%-29.1%
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.5x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 84% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.24x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFHN logoFHNFirst Horizon Cor…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$147M$12.5B$20.3B$9.3B$28.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$214M$16.1B$23.7B$9.2B$57.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.08x13.37x52.27x20.55x8.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.75x11.72x6.24x18.72x6.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.14x2.04x0.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.34x12.03x6.50x11.87x6.44x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.46x2.50x1.90x3.91x1.36x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.84x1.36x1.46x4.40x1.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.25x13.06x7.21x15.78x6.63x
FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $5 for FNWD. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FHN scores 8/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFHN logoFHNFirst Horizon Cor…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.0%+10.7%+18.4%+24.0%+12.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.4%+1.2%+7.5%+17.0%+4.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.4%+7.0%+6.0%+21.0%+8.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.3%+10.2%+6.6%+22.7%+10.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–968665
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.48x0.50x0.29x1.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$66M$3.6B$3.4B-$102M$28.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$18M$961M$599M$102M$798M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$85M$4.6B$4.0B$0$29.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.23x0.82x21.16x122.37x6.39x
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FHN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FHN five years ago would be worth $15,708 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FHN leads with a +30.9% total return vs FISV's -68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FHN at 31.9% vs FISV's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFHN logoFHNFirst Horizon Cor…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.2%+5.6%-38.9%-27.4%-18.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.7%+30.9%-49.4%-27.5%-68.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+68.0%+129.7%-18.9%-15.1%-54.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-15.4%+57.1%-67.3%-14.9%-50.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.1%+123.8%-25.6%+74.8%+1.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.9%+31.9%-6.8%-5.3%-23.0%
FHN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FHN and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FHN's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FHN currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 30.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFHN logoFHNFirst Horizon Cor…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.41x0.97x0.61x0.10x0.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$39.88$26.56$82.74$193.39$177.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.46$19.04$37.91$124.63$51.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.2%+94.7%+47.4%+66.3%+30.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.561.030.827.540.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K3.9M5.6M1.2M5.7M
Evenly matched — FHN and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FNWD as "Buy", FHN as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy", FISV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 11.4% for FHN (target: $28). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs FNWD's 1.07%.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFHN logoFHNFirst Horizon Cor…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$41.00$28.00$62.88$194.63$71.15
# AnalystsCovering analysts235372260
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+2.5%+4.2%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00122
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.36$0.63$1.63$2.25
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+8.0%+7.0%+0.4%+20.5%
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallFirst Horizon Corporation (FHN)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FNWD vs FHN vs FIS vs JKHY vs FISV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FNWD or FHN or FIS or JKHY or FISV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Finward Bancorp (FNWD) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FNWD or FHN or FIS or JKHY or FISV?

On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.

(FISV) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FNWD or FHN or FIS or JKHY or FISV?

Over the past 5 years, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) delivered a total return of +57.

1%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FHN returned +123. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FNWD or FHN or FIS or JKHY or FISV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus First Horizon Corporation's 0. 97β — meaning FHN is approximately 840% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FNWD or FHN or FIS or JKHY or FISV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Horizon Corporation grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FNWD or FHN or FIS or JKHY or FISV?

First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

7% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 8. 0% for FNWD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FHN leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FNWD or FHN or FIS or JKHY or FISV more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FNWD or FHN or FIS or JKHY or FISV?

In this comparison, FIS (4.

2% yield), FHN (2. 5% yield), JKHY (1. 8% yield), FNWD (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FNWD or FHN or FIS or JKHY or FISV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 10), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +74. 8%, FISV: +1. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FNWD and FHN and FIS and JKHY and FISV?

These companies operate in different sectors (FNWD (Financial Services) and FHN (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology) and FISV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FNWD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FHN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. FNWD, FHN, FIS, JKHY pay a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.