Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FNWD logo
FNWD
FIS logo
FIS
KO logo
KO
JKHY logo
JKHY
PEP logo
PEP
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FNWD vs FIS vs KO vs JKHY vs PEP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FNWD
Finward Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$147M
5Y Perf.+3.6%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.28B
5Y Perf.-30.3%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$197.17B
5Y Perf.+9.1%

FNWD vs FIS vs KO vs JKHY vs PEP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FNWD logoFNWD
FIS logoFIS
KO logoKO
JKHY logoJKHY
PEP logoPEP
IndustryBanks - RegionalInformation Technology ServicesBeverages - Non-AlcoholicInformation Technology ServicesBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$147M$20.26B$355.61B$9.28B$197.17B
Revenue (TTM)$101M$11.66B$49.28B$2.52B$93.92B
Net Income (TTM)$8M$2.67B$13.70B$519M$8.24B
Gross Margin65.6%37.6%61.7%44.1%54.1%
Operating Margin8.0%17.9%29.3%26.0%12.2%
Forward P/E12.8x6.2x25.3x18.7x16.7x
Total Debt$85M$4.01B$45.49B$0.00$49.90B
Cash & Equiv.$18M$599M$10.27B$102M$9.16B

FNWD vs FIS vs KO vs JKHY vs PEPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FNWD
FIS
KO
JKHY
PEP
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Finward Bancorp (FNWD)100103.6+3.6%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY)10069.7-30.3%
PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)100109.1+9.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FNWD vs FIS vs KO vs JKHY vs PEP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JKHY leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. FNWD and KO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JKHY emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FNWD
Finward Bancorp
The Banking Pick

FNWD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 48.5%, current ratio 1.77x
  • +18.7% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 0.26 vs PEP's 5.11
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 16.7x), PEG 0.26 vs 5.11
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Long-Run Compounder

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 121.1% 10Y total return vs PEP's 82.3%
  • 27.8% margin vs FNWD's 8.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
The Income Pick

JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 1.8%
  • Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
  • Beta 0.10, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.27x
  • 7.2% revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, PEP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJKHY logoJKHY7.2% revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 16.7x), PEG 0.26 vs 5.11
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs FNWD's 8.0%
Stability / SafetyJKHY logoJKHYBeta 0.10 vs FIS's 0.61
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)FNWD logoFNWD+18.7% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)JKHY logoJKHY17.0% ROA vs FNWD's 0.4%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.4%

FNWD vs FIS vs KO vs JKHY vs PEP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FNWDFinward Bancorp

Segment breakdown not available.

FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JKHYJack Henry & Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Payments
38.2%$873M
Core Segment
32.3%$739M
Complementary
29.5%$675M
PEPPepsiCo, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FNWD vs FIS vs KO vs JKHY vs PEP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGPEP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

PEP is the larger business by revenue, generating $93.9B annually — 929.4x FNWD's $101M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FNWD's 8.0%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$101M$11.7B$49.3B$2.5B$93.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$13M$4.1B$15.5B$810M$14.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$8M$2.7B$13.7B$519M$8.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$2.8B$12.6B$728M$7.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+65.6%+37.6%+61.7%+44.1%+54.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.0%+17.9%+29.3%+26.0%+12.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.0%+22.9%+27.8%+20.6%+8.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.6%+23.9%+25.5%+28.9%+8.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%+12.1%+8.7%+5.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.1%+30.6%+18.2%+12.5%+66.7%
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FNWD and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 18.1x trailing earnings, FNWD trades at a 65% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JKHY offers better value at 2.04x vs PEP's 7.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$147M$20.3B$355.6B$9.3B$197.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$214M$23.7B$390.8B$9.2B$237.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.08x52.27x27.18x20.55x24.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.75x6.24x25.27x18.72x16.68x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.14x2.43x2.04x7.37x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.34x6.50x26.39x11.87x16.63x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.46x1.90x7.42x3.91x2.10x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.84x1.46x10.40x4.40x9.63x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.25x7.21x67.15x15.78x25.70x
Evenly matched — FNWD and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JKHY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $5 for FNWD. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PEP's 2.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PEP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.0%+18.4%+41.1%+24.0%+40.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.4%+7.5%+13.1%+17.0%+7.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.4%+6.0%+15.8%+21.0%+14.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.3%+6.6%+17.3%+22.7%+16.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966765
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.48x0.29x1.33x2.43x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$66M$3.4B$35.2B-$102M$40.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$18M$599M$10.3B$102M$9.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$85M$4.0B$45.5B$0$49.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.23x21.16x10.70x122.37x10.34x
JKHY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — FNWD and KO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FNWD leads with a +18.7% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FNWD at 18.9% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.2%-38.9%+20.3%-27.4%+3.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.7%-49.4%+17.2%-27.5%+13.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+68.0%-18.9%+47.0%-15.1%-11.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-15.4%-67.3%+65.6%-14.9%+14.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.1%-25.6%+121.1%+74.8%+82.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.9%-6.8%+13.7%-5.3%-4.1%
Evenly matched — FNWD and KO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIS's 0.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.41x0.61x-0.20x0.10x-0.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$39.88$82.74$84.04$193.39$171.48
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.46$37.91$65.35$124.63$127.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.2%+47.4%+98.3%+66.3%+84.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.530.860.627.541.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K5.6M12.7M1.2M6.0M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FNWD as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy", PEP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs FNWD's 1.07%.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$41.00$62.88$86.13$194.63$167.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts237482245
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+4.2%+2.5%+1.8%+3.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01562254
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.36$1.63$2.04$2.25$5.57
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+7.0%+0.2%+0.4%+0.5%
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JKHY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 4 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FNWD vs FIS vs KO vs JKHY vs PEP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FNWD or FIS or KO or JKHY or PEP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). Finward Bancorp (FNWD) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Finward Bancorp (FNWD) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FNWD or FIS or KO or JKHY or PEP?

On trailing P/E, Finward Bancorp (FNWD) is the cheapest at 18.

1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FNWD or FIS or KO or JKHY or PEP?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.

6%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FNWD or FIS or KO or JKHY or PEP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. 's 0. 61β — meaning FIS is approximately -403% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 2% for PepsiCo, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FNWD or FIS or KO or JKHY or PEP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FNWD or FIS or KO or JKHY or PEP?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 8. 0% for FNWD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FNWD leads at 65. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FNWD or FIS or KO or JKHY or PEP more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FNWD or FIS or KO or JKHY or PEP?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 1% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD).

09

Is FNWD or FIS or KO or JKHY or PEP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FNWD and FIS and KO and JKHY and PEP?

These companies operate in different sectors (FNWD (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JKHY (Technology) and PEP (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FNWD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JKHY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PEP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.