FONR vs AEYE

For growth investors, AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is the stronger pick with 14. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for FONAR Corporation (FONR). FONAR Corporation (FONR) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, FONAR Corporation (FONR) delivered a total return of +8.

4%, compared to -63. 7% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +80. 2% versus FONR's +33. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FONAR Corporation (FONR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

10β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 2094% more volatile than FONR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 24% for FONAR Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is pulling ahead at 14. 5% versus 1. 4% for FONAR Corporation (FONR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AudioEye, Inc. grew EPS 30. 6% year-over-year, compared to -19. 6% for FONAR Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEYE leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

FONAR Corporation (FONR) is the more profitable company, earning 8.

0% net margin versus -7. 6% for AudioEye, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FONR leads at 11. 1% versus -7. 9% for AEYE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FONR leads at 81. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, FONAR Corporation (FONR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

10)). AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FONR: +33. 6%, AEYE: +80. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (FONR (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FONR is a small-cap deep-value stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.