Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FOR vs SKY vs LGIH vs TMHC vs DHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
FOR vs SKY vs LGIH vs TMHC vs DHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.39B | $4.05B | $1.07B | $5.56B | $42.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.71B | $2.64B | $1.67B | $7.61B | $33.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $167M | $214M | $71M | $672M | $3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 21.3% | 26.3% | 20.3% | 22.4% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 9.8% | 4.7% | 13.2% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 19.4x | 16.6x | 11.2x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $817M | $131M | $1.66B | $2.36B | $6.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $379M | $610M | $61M | $851M | $2.99B |
FOR vs SKY vs LGIH vs TMHC vs DHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
| Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) | 100 | 295.0 | +195.0% |
| LGI Homes, Inc. (LGIH) | 100 | 55.5 | -44.5% |
| Taylor Morrison Hom… (TMHC) | 100 | 307.7 | +207.7% |
| D.R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) | 100 | 264.0 | +164.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FOR vs SKY vs LGIH vs TMHC vs DHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FOR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and momentum.
- 9.8% margin vs LGIH's 4.2%
- +39.4% vs SKY's -16.3%
SKY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 22.7%, EPS growth 35.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- 7.1% 10Y total return vs TMHC's 321.2%
- 22.7% revenue growth vs LGIH's -22.6%
- 10.1% ROA vs LGIH's 1.8%, ROIC 16.9% vs 1.7%
Among these 5 stocks, LGIH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TMHC is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.34 vs DHI's 1.09
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 13.7x), PEG 0.34 vs 1.09
DHI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 17.39x
- Beta 0.85, yield 1.1%, current ratio 17.39x
- Beta 0.85 vs LGIH's 1.70, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.7% revenue growth vs LGIH's -22.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 13.7x), PEG 0.34 vs 1.09 | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs LGIH's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs LGIH's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs SKY's -16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.1% ROA vs LGIH's 1.8%, ROIC 16.9% vs 1.7% |
FOR vs SKY vs LGIH vs TMHC vs DHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FOR vs SKY vs LGIH vs TMHC vs DHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FOR leads in 1 of 6 categories
TMHC leads 1 • SKY leads 1 • DHI leads 1 • LGIH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.3B annually — 19.9x LGIH's $1.7B. FOR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LGIH's 4.2%. On growth, FOR holds the edge at +6.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $2.6B | $1.7B | $7.6B | $33.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $213M | $306M | $82M | $1.0B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $167M | $214M | $71M | $672M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $266M | $260M | -$69M | $710M | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | +26.3% | +20.3% | +22.4% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +9.8% | +4.7% | +13.2% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +8.1% | +4.2% | +8.8% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +9.9% | -4.1% | +9.3% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | +1.8% | -9.0% | -26.8% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | -3.0% | -47.1% | -51.2% | -13.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TMHC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.7x trailing earnings, TMHC trades at a 64% valuation discount to SKY's 21.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TMHC offers better value at 0.23x vs DHI's 1.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $4.1B | $1.1B | $5.6B | $42.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $3.6B | $2.7B | $7.1B | $45.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.29x | 21.43x | 14.84x | 7.65x | 12.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.22x | 19.44x | 16.56x | 11.22x | 13.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.39x | 0.78x | — | 0.23x | 1.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.59x | 12.69x | 31.71x | 6.18x | 10.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 1.63x | 0.63x | 0.68x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 2.76x | 0.51x | 0.95x | 1.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.29x | — | 6.88x | 12.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SKY leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SKY delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for LGIH. SKY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LGIH's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKY scores 7/9 vs FOR's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +13.4% | +3.4% | +10.8% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +10.1% | +1.8% | +6.9% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +16.9% | +1.7% | +11.0% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +14.8% | +2.1% | +13.2% | +13.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.08x | 0.79x | 0.37x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $438M | -$479M | $1.6B | $1.5B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $379M | $610M | $61M | $851M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $817M | $131M | $1.7B | $2.4B | $6.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 51.32x | — | 19.94x | 44.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FOR and DHI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMHC five years ago would be worth $18,573 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,525 for LGIH. Over the past 12 months, FOR leads with a +39.4% total return vs SKY's -16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DHI at 11.5% vs LGIH's -26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.1% | -13.7% | +11.0% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.4% | -16.3% | -14.5% | +2.0% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.4% | -2.6% | -60.2% | +37.4% | +38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.0% | +64.0% | -74.8% | +85.7% | +46.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +118.1% | +714.5% | +56.4% | +321.2% | +424.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.2% | -0.9% | -26.4% | +11.2% | +11.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FOR and DHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHI is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LGIH's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOR currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs LGIH's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.96x | 1.70x | 0.92x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.74 | $99.17 | $69.50 | $72.50 | $184.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.50 | $59.44 | $33.59 | $54.58 | $114.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.7% | +73.9% | +66.6% | +82.0% | +79.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.5 | 46.0 | 56.3 | 49.0 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 134K | 500K | 490K | 1.1M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
DHI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FOR as "Buy", SKY as "Buy", LGIH as "Buy", TMHC as "Buy", DHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 91.8% upside for LGIH (target: $89) vs 4.1% for FOR (target: $28). DHI is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.38 | $106.00 | $88.80 | $73.75 | $163.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 8 | 13 | 30 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.0% | 0.0% | +6.9% | +10.1% |
FOR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TMHC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FOR vs SKY vs LGIH vs TMHC vs DHI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FOR or SKY or LGIH or TMHC or DHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for LGI Homes, Inc. (LGIH). Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) offers the better valuation at 7. 7x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FOR or SKY or LGIH or TMHC or DHI?
On trailing P/E, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) is the cheapest at 7.
7x versus Champion Homes, Inc. at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, Forestar Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taylor Morrison Home Corporation wins at 0. 34x versus D. R. Horton, Inc. 's 1. 09x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FOR or SKY or LGIH or TMHC or DHI?
Over the past 5 years, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) delivered a total return of +85.
7%, compared to -74. 8% for LGI Homes, Inc. (LGIH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKY returned +714. 5% versus LGIH's +56. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FOR or SKY or LGIH or TMHC or DHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus LGI Homes, Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning LGIH is approximately 100% more volatile than DHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 79% for LGI Homes, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FOR or SKY or LGIH or TMHC or DHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus -22. 6% for LGI Homes, Inc. (LGIH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Champion Homes, Inc. grew EPS 35. 2% year-over-year, compared to -62. 4% for LGI Homes, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKY leads at 4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FOR or SKY or LGIH or TMHC or DHI?
D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 5% net margin versus 4. 3% for LGI Homes, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMHC leads at 14. 0% versus 4. 7% for LGIH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKY leads at 26. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FOR or SKY or LGIH or TMHC or DHI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus D. R. Horton, Inc. 's 1. 09x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 19. 4x for Champion Homes, Inc. — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LGIH: 91. 8% to $88. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — FOR or SKY or LGIH or TMHC or DHI?
In this comparison, DHI (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. FOR, SKY, LGIH, TMHC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FOR or SKY or LGIH or TMHC or DHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 1. 1% yield, +424. 3% 10Y return). LGI Homes, Inc. (LGIH) carries a higher beta of 1. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHI: +424. 3%, LGIH: +56. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FOR and SKY and LGIH and TMHC and DHI?
These companies operate in different sectors (FOR (Real Estate) and SKY (Consumer Cyclical) and LGIH (Consumer Cyclical) and TMHC (Consumer Cyclical) and DHI (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FOR is a small-cap deep-value stock; SKY is a small-cap high-growth stock; LGIH is a small-cap deep-value stock; TMHC is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHI is a mid-cap deep-value stock. DHI pays a dividend while FOR, SKY, LGIH, TMHC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.